American veterans of every branch standing together before the United States flag at dusk
Veterans Fighting For Veterans

We sit shoulder‑to‑shoulder with veterans and fight to win the benefits you earned.

Free ConsultationNo Fees Unless You Win
Black male veteran in his forties mid-sneeze into a tissue with watering eyes and visible nasal irritation in his home
Sinusitis & Rhinitis — all conditions
DC 6522 · #45147

Allergic & Chronic Rhinitis

Your rhinitis rating under 38 CFR §4.97, Diagnostic Code 6522, comes down to two objective findings — not how miserable you feel. The VA does not rate rhinitis on congestion, sneezing, or a runny nose. It rates on anatomy: whether you have nasal polyps, and how much of your nasal airway is blocked. Nasal polyps documented on examination support 30% — the maximum schedular rating under this code, and once polyps are confirmed no obstruction measurement is needed. Without polyps, the rating turns on measured obstruction: greater than 50% obstruction of BOTH nasal passages, OR complete (100%) obstruction of ONE side, supports 10%. A service-connected rhinitis that does not meet either threshold is rated 0% — no monthly payment, but it still establishes the service connection that anchors secondary claims. The single biggest mistake veterans make is walking out of a C&P exam with the examiner having written "rhinitis, stable" and never measuring or recording the obstruction percentage — which caps you at 0%. Chronic rhinitis is a PACT Act presumptive for veterans exposed to burn pits and airborne hazards — diagnosis plus qualifying service equals connection, no nexus letter required.

Allergic and chronic rhinitis is one of the most commonly claimed — and most commonly under-rated — conditions among veterans who deployed into burn-pit smoke, sand, dust, and airborne particulates. Under 38 CFR §4.97, Diagnostic Code 6522, the VA rates rhinitis on objective clinical findings only — the presence of nasal polyps and the measured percentage of nasal obstruction. It does not rate on how bad your congestion, sneezing, or post-nasal drip feels, and it does not consider how much your medication helps. The entire schedular ladder has just three rungs: 30% with nasal polyps (the maximum), 10% without polyps but with greater than 50% obstruction of both nasal passages or complete obstruction of one side, and 0% for a service-connected rhinitis that meets neither threshold. The most important thing every veteran with rhinitis needs to know is this: chronic rhinitis is on the PACT Act presumptive list for airborne-hazard and burn-pit exposure. If you served in the Southwest Asia theater, Afghanistan, or another qualifying location during the covered periods, your service connection is presumed — no nexus letter required. Beyond the presumptive path, rhinitis is commonly connected directly to in-service allergen and irritant exposures, and secondarily to a service-connected deviated septum, chronic sinusitis, or asthma. Rhinitis is also a powerful gateway condition: chronic nasal obstruction is a recognized pathway to obstructive sleep apnea, chronic sinusitis, and migraine headaches, each rated under its own code.

The Diagnostic Codes

Conditions Rated In Sinusitis & Rhinitis

These are the codes the VA will actually stamp on a decision in this group. The code you are granted under decides which formula is used — and that decides your percentage. Allergic & Chronic Rhinitis (DC 6522) is highlighted below.

DC 6510-6514

White male veteran in his late fifties pressing his fingers to the bridge of his nose with a pained expression from sinus pressure in his living room

Chronic Sinusitis

Your chronic sinusitis rating under 38 CFR §4.97, Diagnostic Codes 6510 through 6514, is decided by one thing above all else: how many episodes you have per year and how severe each one is. The VA counts two kinds of episodes. An incapacitating episode is a sinus infection so severe it requires BOTH bed rest AND treatment prescribed by a physician — usually a prolonged four-to-six-week course of antibiotics. A non-incapacitating episode is a flare characterized by headaches, facial pain, and purulent discharge or crusting that does not put you in bed. Three or more incapacitating episodes a year, OR more than six non-incapacitating episodes a year, supports 30%. One or two incapacitating episodes, OR three to six non-incapacitating episodes, supports 10%. Near-constant sinusitis with headaches, pain, tenderness, and purulent discharge or crusting after repeated surgeries — or radical surgery with chronic osteomyelitis — supports 50%. The single biggest mistake veterans make is not documenting each infection: if it is not in your medical records with the treatment prescribed, the VA acts as if it never happened. Chronic sinusitis is a PACT Act presumptive for veterans exposed to burn pits and airborne hazards — diagnosis plus qualifying service equals connection, no nexus letter required.

Read the full page

DC 6522

Black male veteran in his forties mid-sneeze into a tissue with watering eyes and visible nasal irritation in his home

Allergic & Chronic Rhinitis

Your rhinitis rating under 38 CFR §4.97, Diagnostic Code 6522, comes down to two objective findings — not how miserable you feel. The VA does not rate rhinitis on congestion, sneezing, or a runny nose. It rates on anatomy: whether you have nasal polyps, and how much of your nasal airway is blocked. Nasal polyps documented on examination support 30% — the maximum schedular rating under this code, and once polyps are confirmed no obstruction measurement is needed. Without polyps, the rating turns on measured obstruction: greater than 50% obstruction of BOTH nasal passages, OR complete (100%) obstruction of ONE side, supports 10%. A service-connected rhinitis that does not meet either threshold is rated 0% — no monthly payment, but it still establishes the service connection that anchors secondary claims. The single biggest mistake veterans make is walking out of a C&P exam with the examiner having written "rhinitis, stable" and never measuring or recording the obstruction percentage — which caps you at 0%. Chronic rhinitis is a PACT Act presumptive for veterans exposed to burn pits and airborne hazards — diagnosis plus qualifying service equals connection, no nexus letter required.

You are reading this page

Before Anything Gets Rated

What The VA Is Actually Looking For — And What Service Connection Really Means

Before the VA ever opens the rating schedule, it asks one question: is this disability the government’s responsibility? That is what “service connection” means. It is not a diagnosis, it is not sympathy, and it is not a reward for having served. It is a legal finding that a current, diagnosed disability is linked to something that happened to you in uniform. Percentages come later. If service connection is not established, there is nothing to rate and the claim is denied — no matter how bad the allergic & chronic rhinitis (dc 6522) is.

A veteran reviewing a VA decision letter at his desk, hands gripping the document

The three elements the VA must find. All three. Every time.

These come out of Caluza v. Brown and Shedden v. Principi, and they are the checklist a rating officer works through on your file. Miss one and the claim fails on that element alone.

1

A current, diagnosed disability

A doctor has to have written a diagnosis in a medical record — allergic & chronic rhinitis (dc 6522). Symptoms by themselves are not a disability the VA can rate. Saunders v. Wilkie held that pain causing functional impairment can be a disability, but you still need a clinician to document it as diagnosed and impairing. The diagnosis must exist now, during the claim period — not only years ago.

2

An in-service event, injury, illness or aggravation

Something in service had to have happened — an injury, an exposure, a documented sick call, or steady wear over a career. It does not have to be one dramatic moment and it does not have to be spelled out in your service treatment records: buddy statements, unit records, performance evaluations and your own competent lay testimony can establish it.

3

A medical nexus linking the two

A qualified medical opinion that says the current diagnosis is at least as likely as not related to the in-service event. That phrase matters: at least as likely as not means 50 percent or better. Under 38 C.F.R. §3.102, when the evidence is evenly balanced, the benefit of the doubt goes to you and the claim must be granted.

The five ways service connection is established

Most veterans only know the first one. The other routes are lower-effort paths to the same grant — and the secondary route is the one most often left on the table.

Direct — 38 C.F.R. §3.303(a)

The injury or disease began in service and never went away. The classic route: three elements, one nexus opinion.

Chronicity and continuity — §3.303(b)

A chronic condition shown in service, plus continuity of the same symptoms from separation to now, can establish the link without a formal nexus opinion. Your own testimony about symptoms you can observe is competent evidence.

Presumptive — §3.307 and §3.309

Certain chronic diseases are presumed service connected if they manifest to a compensable degree within a set window after separation. You do not have to prove causation at all.

Secondary — §3.310(a) and (b)

A disability proximately due to, or aggravated by, an already service-connected condition is itself service connected. This is how the downstream conditions allergic & chronic rhinitis (dc 6522) sets off get on the rating sheet.

Aggravation of a pre-service condition — §3.306

If you entered service with a condition and service made it permanently worse, the increase is compensable. The VA must rebut the presumption of soundness by clear and unmistakable evidence — a bar it frequently fails to meet.

VA medical care — 38 U.S.C. §1151

An additional disability caused by VA treatment, surgery, or a failure to diagnose is compensated as if it were service connected.

The bottom line — there is no way around this

No diagnosis, no rating. It has to be chronic. It has to cause impairment.

Without a diagnosis, the VA will not rate your claim.

The rating schedule is a list of diagnosed conditions and the codes attached to them. If no clinician has put a name on your condition in a medical record, there is no code to assign. Symptoms reported to a claims examiner are not a diagnosis. Get in front of a doctor and get it written down.

The condition must be chronic.

Chronic means persistent and ongoing — not something that resolved decades ago. The VA compensates a disability you carry today, which is why a documented, continuing treatment history matters more than the single worst day you ever had.

It must cause actual impairment.

Under 38 C.F.R. §4.1 and §4.10, VA compensation exists to pay for reduction in earning capacity. A diagnosis that costs you nothing gets a zero percent rating. The function you have lost is what converts a diagnosis into a percentage.

What this means for you before you file: get the diagnosis in writing, get the treatment history documented so the chronicity is undeniable, and describe the impairment in functional terms — what you can no longer do, and what it costs you at work and at home. Everything on the rest of this page is built on top of those three things.

The Percentages

Rating Schedule — Allergic & Chronic Rhinitis, DC 6522

DC 6522 rates rhinitis on objective anatomy only — the presence of polyps and the measured percentage of obstruction — never on the severity of symptoms, and the ameliorative effects of medication are not considered. 30% is the maximum schedular rating available under this code; there is no higher rhinitis rating regardless of how disabling the condition is. That ceiling is exactly why secondary and gateway claims matter so much in rhinitis cases: chronic nasal obstruction is a recognized pathway to obstructive sleep apnea, chronic sinusitis, and migraine headaches, each rated separately under its own code, and those secondary ratings are often where the real compensation lies. The DBQ form is VA Form 21-0960L-2 (Sinusitis, Rhinitis, and Other Conditions of the Nose, Throat, and Larynx) — the same form used for sinusitis.

Latina female veteran having her nasal passages examined by a clinician using a nasal speculum during a rhinitis examination

30%

Allergic or vasomotor rhinitis with nasal polyps. This is the maximum schedular rating under DC 6522; once polyps are documented, no percentage of obstruction is required.

10%

Allergic or vasomotor rhinitis without polyps, but with greater than 50% obstruction of the nasal passage on both sides, or complete obstruction on one side.

0%

Rhinitis that is service-connected but does not meet the polyp or obstruction criteria. No compensation, but the service connection is established and anchors secondary claims.

Service Connection

Advice from the Advocate

Three-dimensional medical illustration of a cross-section of the human nasal passages showing swollen turbinates and nasal polyps obstructing the airway against a black background
Chronic rhinitis develops when the mucous membranes lining the nasal passages become persistently inflamed and swollen — from allergens, airborne irritants, or non-allergic triggers — narrowing the airway and driving congestion, sneezing, and drainage. When the inflammation is chronic, the swollen turbinate tissue can obstruct more than half of the airway, and long-standing inflammation can produce nasal polyps — soft growths that further block airflow. The VA rates this condition on exactly those two anatomical findings: the percentage of obstruction and the presence of polyps. For veterans, the pathway to service runs through airborne-hazard and burn-pit exposure that chronically inflames the nasal lining (presumptive under the PACT Act), through in-service allergen and irritant exposures, and through secondary connections to a deviated septum, chronic sinusitis, and asthma. Because chronic nasal obstruction forces mouth breathing and fragments sleep, rhinitis is also a recognized gateway to obstructive sleep apnea.

The advocate's notes on causation — Allergic & Chronic Rhinitis (DC 6522)

The separate arguments that decide this code: where the VA will attack, the regulation that answers it, and the evidence that closes the gap.

Distinguished South Asian male VA-accredited disability advocate in his late fifties with gray hair and glasses wearing a charcoal suit in a warm professional office portrait
  1. 1Presumptive — PACT Act airborne-hazard / burn-pit exposure — §3.320

    Chronic rhinitis is on the PACT Act presumptive list for airborne-hazard and burn-pit exposure. If you served in a qualifying location — the Southwest Asia theater during the Gulf War era, or Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, and other post-9/11 locations — during the covered periods, and you have a current diagnosis of chronic rhinitis, the VA presumes service connection. No nexus letter. No independent medical opinion. Qualifying service plus diagnosis equals connection. This is the most direct path to service connection for veterans of the Gulf War and post-9/11 eras.

  2. 2Direct service connection — §3.303(a)

    Rhinitis diagnosed in service, or shown by a documented pattern of in-service nasal allergy and congestion that continued after separation. Sick-call visits for congestion and allergies, prescriptions for antihistamines or nasal steroids in your service treatment records, and continuity of the same symptoms after discharge support a direct connection under §3.303.

  3. 3Secondary to a deviated septum or chronic sinusitis — §3.310(a)

    A deviated nasal septum mechanically narrows the airway, and chronic sinusitis keeps the nasal mucosa persistently inflamed — both worsen or produce chronic rhinitis. If you are service-connected for a deviated septum, nasal injury, or chronic sinusitis and develop rhinitis, the secondary claim is anatomically straightforward and well-supported in the ENT literature.

  4. 4Secondary to asthma — the united airway — §3.310(a)

    Allergic rhinitis and asthma are increasingly understood as one continuous inflammatory disease of the respiratory tract — the "united airway." A veteran service-connected for asthma has a strong basis for a secondary rhinitis claim, and vice versa. The nexus letter should explain the shared allergic-inflammatory mechanism linking the upper and lower airways.

Exposure & Aggravation

How Allergic & Chronic Rhinitis (DC 6522) Happens In Service — And How It Gets Worse

How veterans pick this up in uniform — Allergic & Chronic Rhinitis (DC 6522)

Allergic & Chronic Rhinitis (DC 6522) rarely announces itself with one dramatic moment. It is built by what service asked of your body over months and years — and once it is service-connected, it is compensated for how it keeps getting worse, not for how it started. Below is how veterans pick this up in uniform, and who is most prone to it.

  • Burn-pit and airborne-hazard exposure — chronic rhinitis is a presumptive condition under the PACT Act (§3.320) for veterans who served in the Southwest Asia theater, Afghanistan, and other qualifying locations during the covered periods — no nexus letter required
  • Sand, dust, and fine particulate matter — deployment to arid environments where airborne particulates chronically inflame the nasal mucosa and sensitize the airway
  • Documented in-service allergy and upper respiratory treatment — sick-call visits, antihistamine or nasal-steroid prescriptions, and allergy diagnoses during active duty establishing a chronic pattern
  • Service-connected deviated septum or nasal trauma — structural narrowing that mechanically obstructs the nasal airway and coexists with allergic mucosal swelling, a direct secondary pathway
  • Service-connected chronic sinusitis — persistent sinonasal inflammation that drives and is driven by chronic rhinitis, one of the most common paired connections
  • Service-connected asthma — the "united airway" link, in which upper-airway allergic rhinitis and lower-airway asthma reflect one continuous inflammatory process
  • Chemical and environmental irritant exposure — solvents, fuels, paints, diesel exhaust, and industrial irritants encountered in military occupational settings that sensitize and inflame the nasal lining
  • Living and working in mold-, dust-, and allergen-heavy barracks, tents, and field environments that produce chronic allergic sensitization

Who is most prone to it

Veterans who deployed to the Southwest Asia theater, Iraq, Afghanistan, and other burn-pit and airborne-hazard locations (presumptive under the PACT Act, §3.320); veterans who served in arid, dusty, high-particulate environments; veterans with documented in-service allergy or upper respiratory treatment; veterans service-connected for a deviated septum or nasal trauma (mechanical obstruction); veterans service-connected for chronic sinusitis (paired sinonasal inflammation); veterans service-connected for asthma (the united-airway link); and veterans exposed to solvents, fuels, diesel exhaust, and industrial irritants during service.

The Symptoms

What Allergic & Chronic Rhinitis (DC 6522) Actually Feels Like

  • Chronic nasal congestion and obstruction — a persistently blocked nose, often worse on one side, that does not fully clear with medication
  • Sneezing fits and clear, watery nasal discharge (rhinorrhea) — the classic allergic pattern triggered by dust, pollen, smoke, or irritants
  • Post-nasal drip and chronic throat clearing — mucus running down the back of the throat, triggering cough and hoarseness
  • Nasal polyps — soft, painless growths in the nasal passages that block airflow and drive the 30% rating
  • Mouth breathing and disrupted sleep — the inability to breathe through the nose forcing open-mouth breathing, snoring, and non-restorative sleep
  • Itchy, watery eyes, nose, and throat — the allergic conjunctivitis and pruritus that accompany allergic rhinitis
  • Reduced or lost sense of smell and taste — chronic mucosal swelling dulling the olfactory nerves
  • Daytime fatigue and difficulty concentrating — the downstream cost of chronically obstructed breathing and fragmented sleep

How this one is rated

Rhinitis is rated under 38 CFR §4.97, DC 6522 on objective findings only. The tiers are: 30% when nasal polyps are present — this is the maximum schedular rating under 6522, and once polyps are documented no obstruction percentage is required; 10% when there are no polyps but there is greater than 50% obstruction of the nasal passages on both sides, OR complete obstruction on one side; and 0% when the rhinitis is service-connected but meets neither the polyp nor the obstruction threshold. Critically, the VA rates on the anatomy — polyps and measured obstruction — not on the severity of congestion, sneezing, or drainage, and the ameliorative effect of medication is not considered. A veteran whose obstruction is controlled with a daily steroid spray is still rated on the underlying obstruction, not the medicated result.

What you are measured against

The rating is measured against what the examiner objectively sees and measures — which is why the exam findings, not your symptom description, decide a rhinitis claim. The two findings that matter are nasal polyps (present or absent) and the percentage of nasal obstruction on each side. The examiner establishes these through anterior rhinoscopy (a speculum-and-light inspection of the nasal passages), nasal endoscopy (a scope passed into the nasal cavity, the most reliable way to detect polyps deep in the passages), and CT imaging, which objectively documents both polyps and the degree of obstruction. The trap is that many C&P examiners never record an obstruction percentage at all — they write "rhinitis" without measuring — which defaults you to 0%. The rating requires the record to state, in objective terms, either that polyps are present or that obstruction exceeds 50% bilaterally or is complete on one side. Note also that imaging or reports describing "nodular changes" or "retention cysts" are not the same as documented nasal polyps; the Board has denied 30% ratings where the record lacked definitive clinical confirmation of polyps.

Each One On Its Own Page

Secondary Conditions — Aggravated or Caused by a Current Service-Connected Condition

Under 38 CFR §3.310(a), a disability that is proximately due to a service-connected condition is service-connected in its own right — and under §3.310(b), so is any additional disability caused when a service-connected condition aggravates a problem you already had. Each condition below is a separate evaluation with its own diagnostic code and its own percentage. They do not fold into the allergic & chronic rhinitis (dc 6522) rating — they stack on top of it. A veteran who claims only the primary condition leaves these ratings on the table.

Middle Eastern female veteran in her 40s at an office desk looking congested and fatigued while struggling to work through rhinitis symptoms

Occupational impact and unemployability

Chronic rhinitis with constant obstruction, drainage, and the fatigue of fragmented sleep quietly erodes work capacity. The inability to breathe through the nose, chronic tiredness, difficulty concentrating, and the downstream effects of sleep apnea and sinus disease all take a toll on the job. Because rhinitis itself is capped at 30%, the occupational picture matters most when rhinitis is combined with its secondary conditions. Document the workdays you have lost, the accommodations you have needed, and the tasks you can no longer perform reliably. Veterans whose service-connected conditions — rhinitis plus its secondaries — prevent substantially gainful employment should pursue TDIU, which compensates at the 100% rate even when the schedular rating is lower.

White female veteran in her 50s standing pensively by a window with a reflective expression symbolizing toxic burn-pit exposure during deployment

Burn-pit and airborne-hazard exposure — the PACT Act presumptive

The strongest service-connection pathway for most Gulf War and post-9/11 veterans runs through toxic exposure. Burn pits, sand, dust, and airborne particulates chronically inflame and sensitize the nasal lining, and Congress recognized this by placing chronic rhinitis on the PACT Act presumptive list under §3.320. If you served in the Southwest Asia theater, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, or another qualifying location during the covered periods, your service connection is presumed — diagnosis plus qualifying service, no nexus letter required. Make sure your deployment locations and dates are documented so the presumptive pathway is triggered.

Hispanic male veteran in his 50s consulting with an East Asian female allergist in a medical office as she explains his rhinitis condition

ENT and allergy documentation and the gateway to sleep apnea

A treating ear-nose-throat specialist or allergist carries far more weight than a brief general C&P evaluation. If you see an ENT or allergist, ensure your records include a nasal endoscopy documenting or excluding polyps, a recorded obstruction percentage for each side, CT imaging, and allergy-testing results. Chronic rhinitis is a recognized gateway to obstructive sleep apnea — persistent nasal obstruction forces mouth breathing and disrupts upper-airway patency during sleep — and to chronic sinusitis and migraine headaches. Because rhinitis is capped at 30%, a strong nexus from your ENT connecting rhinitis to secondary sleep apnea, sinusitis, and migraines is where the meaningful compensation is built.

Accredited Claims Agent #45147

Ready To Get This Rated Correctly?

Contingency fee — zero upfront, paid only from back pay when you win. If your rating does not increase, you owe nothing.

Sinusitis & Rhinitis, In Detail

Sinusitis & Rhinitis — Service Connection In Depth

Here is each claimable condition in this group on its own terms — what it is, what service did to it, and what the VA requires before it will connect it.

White male veteran in his late fifties pressing his fingers to the bridge of his nose with a pained expression from sinus pressure in his living room
DC 6510-6514

Chronic Sinusitis

Chronic sinusitis is one of the most common — and most under-documented — conditions among veterans, especially those who deployed to environments filled with burn-pit smoke, sand, dust, and airborne particulates. Under 38 CFR §4.97, Diagnostic Codes 6510 through 6514, the VA rates sinusitis using the General Rating Formula for Sinusitis, and the entire formula comes down to counting episodes. The diagnostic code depends on which sinuses are affected — 6510 pansinusitis, 6511 ethmoid, 6512 frontal, 6513 maxillary (the most common), and 6514 sphenoid — but every one of them is rated on the same formula. The critical distinction the VA draws is between an incapacitating episode (one requiring both bed rest and physician-directed treatment, typically a prolonged four-to-six-week course of antibiotics) and a non-incapacitating episode (headaches, facial pain, and purulent discharge or crusting that does not require bed rest). The most important thing every veteran with sinusitis needs to know is this: chronic sinusitis is on the PACT Act presumptive list for airborne-hazard and burn-pit exposure. If you served in the Southwest Asia theater, Afghanistan, or another qualifying location during the covered periods, your service connection is presumed — no nexus letter required. Beyond the presumptive path, sinusitis is commonly connected directly to in-service infections and exposures, and secondarily to a service-connected deviated septum, allergic rhinitis, or GERD. Chronic sinusitis is also a powerful gateway condition: it frequently supports secondary claims for obstructive sleep apnea and migraine headaches.

Read the full Chronic Sinusitis (DC 6510–6514) page
Black male veteran in his forties mid-sneeze into a tissue with watering eyes and visible nasal irritation in his home
DC 6522

Allergic & Chronic Rhinitis

Allergic and chronic rhinitis is one of the most commonly claimed — and most commonly under-rated — conditions among veterans who deployed into burn-pit smoke, sand, dust, and airborne particulates. Under 38 CFR §4.97, Diagnostic Code 6522, the VA rates rhinitis on objective clinical findings only — the presence of nasal polyps and the measured percentage of nasal obstruction. It does not rate on how bad your congestion, sneezing, or post-nasal drip feels, and it does not consider how much your medication helps. The entire schedular ladder has just three rungs: 30% with nasal polyps (the maximum), 10% without polyps but with greater than 50% obstruction of both nasal passages or complete obstruction of one side, and 0% for a service-connected rhinitis that meets neither threshold. The most important thing every veteran with rhinitis needs to know is this: chronic rhinitis is on the PACT Act presumptive list for airborne-hazard and burn-pit exposure. If you served in the Southwest Asia theater, Afghanistan, or another qualifying location during the covered periods, your service connection is presumed — no nexus letter required. Beyond the presumptive path, rhinitis is commonly connected directly to in-service allergen and irritant exposures, and secondarily to a service-connected deviated septum, chronic sinusitis, or asthma. Rhinitis is also a powerful gateway condition: chronic nasal obstruction is a recognized pathway to obstructive sleep apnea, chronic sinusitis, and migraine headaches, each rated under its own code.

You are reading this page now

The C&P Exam

What To Expect At The Allergic & Chronic Rhinitis (DC 6522) Exam

This is the encounter your rating is built on. The examiner has a checklist and a limited window — what follows is exactly what happens in that room, so none of it surprises you.

Clinical Section — What To Expect at the Exam

What to Expect at Your Rhinitis C&P Examination

Diagnostic Code 6522 — nasal polyps and measured obstruction percentage decide everything

The VA rhinitis examination uses **VA Form 21-0960L-2** and turns on two objective findings the examiner must document: **whether you have nasal polyps** and **the percentage of nasal obstruction on each side**. Everything else — how much you sneeze, how congested you feel, how bad the drainage is — does not move the rating. This is why rhinitis is one of the conditions where **making sure the examiner actually measures and records the obstruction is more important than describing your symptoms**. The most common failure is an examiner who writes "rhinitis, on nasal spray" and never records an obstruction percentage or looks for polyps — which caps you at 0% no matter how disabled you are. Walk into this exam determined to get two things into the record: a clear statement of whether polyps are present (best confirmed by nasal endoscopy, not just a quick speculum look), and a specific obstruction percentage for each nasal passage. Bring your ENT records, any CT imaging, and your allergy-testing results — and remember the rule that the VA rates the underlying obstruction, **not** the medicated result.

Condition

Allergic & Chronic Rhinitis (DC 6522) — DC 6522

Governing questionnaire

VA Form 21-0960L-2, Sinusitis/Rhinitis and Other Conditions of the Nose, Throat, and Larynx DBQ — presence of nasal polyps, percentage of nasal obstruction on each side, allergy testing, imaging, and functional impact

Click the form number to open the official questionnaire on VA.gov.

01In The Room

What happens during the exam

The tests and maneuvers for this condition

  • Nasal endoscopy — a thin rigid or flexible scope passed into the nasal passages, the most reliable way to detect nasal polyps deep in the cavity that a speculum exam misses
  • Anterior rhinoscopy — a speculum-and-light inspection of the front of the nasal passages documenting turbinate swelling, discharge, and the degree of obstruction
  • CT scan of the sinuses and nasal passages — objective imaging that documents both polyps and the degree of nasal obstruction and rules in coexisting sinus disease
  • Measurement of nasal obstruction percentage — a specific recorded percentage for each nasal passage, the finding that determines the 10% threshold
  • Allergy testing (skin-prick or serum IgE) — confirming the allergic basis, identifying triggers, and distinguishing allergic from vasomotor rhinitis
  • Review of the medication history — antihistamines, nasal steroid sprays, and decongestants, with attention to whether medication was held before the exam so obstruction is measured unmedicated
  • Assessment for coexisting sleep apnea — screening for snoring, witnessed apneas, and daytime somnolence that open the secondary sleep apnea claim
  • Review of service exposure history — burn-pit, airborne-hazard, and allergen exposures that establish the presumptive and direct pathways

What gets measured, and to what number

Presence of nasal polyps

The single finding that produces the maximum 30% rating. Polyps are best detected on nasal endoscopy, which sees deep into the nasal cavity where a quick speculum exam cannot. The record must state "nasal polyps" specifically — "nodular changes" or "retention cysts" have been held insufficient by the Board.

Percentage of nasal obstruction — each side

Without polyps, the 10% rating requires greater than 50% obstruction of BOTH nasal passages, OR complete (100%) obstruction of ONE side. The examiner must record a specific percentage for each side. A note without a measured percentage defaults you to 0%.

Unmedicated versus medicated obstruction

The VA rates the underlying obstruction, not the result after your medication has shrunk the tissue. Because decongestants can mask true obstruction, the exam should reflect your unmedicated baseline — which is why holding decongestants before the exam matters.

Allergy testing and diagnosis type

Skin-prick or serum allergy testing confirms the allergic basis and identifies triggers, distinguishing allergic rhinitis from vasomotor (non-allergic) rhinitis. Both are rated under 6522, but the allergic diagnosis strengthens the exposure and presumptive pathways.

Downstream findings — sleep, sinuses, airway

The examiner should document mouth breathing, disrupted sleep, and any coexisting sinusitis or asthma — the findings that open secondary claims for obstructive sleep apnea, chronic sinusitis, and migraine headaches, where the meaningful compensation often lies.

02Orientation

What to expect during this exam

What makes this exam different from every other C&P exam

1The rating is anatomy, not symptoms — get polyps and obstruction into the record

Rhinitis is rated on two objective findings only: nasal polyps (30%) and measured obstruction of greater than 50% on both sides or complete obstruction on one side (10%). Congestion, sneezing, and runny nose — however severe — do not by themselves support any compensable rating. The examiner must document polyps or a specific obstruction percentage. If the exam note just says "rhinitis" with no polyp finding and no obstruction measurement, you will be rated 0%.

2Do NOT use decongestants before your exam

Oral decongestants and topical sprays like oxymetazoline temporarily shrink the swollen nasal tissue and can make your obstruction look far milder than it truly is on exam day. Veterans routinely use their spray the morning of the C&P exam out of habit and hand the examiner an artificially clear airway — turning a 10% obstruction into a 0% reading. Ask your doctor which medications to hold and for how long before the exam so the examiner measures your true, unmedicated obstruction.

330% is the ceiling — build the secondary and gateway claims

The maximum schedular rating under DC 6522 is 30%. Because rhinitis itself is capped, the compensation strategy runs through the conditions it causes and aggravates: obstructive sleep apnea, chronic sinusitis, and migraine headaches are each rated under their own codes. Chronic rhinitis is also presumptive under the PACT Act. If you were denied before the PACT Act, file a supplemental claim, and make sure your sleep apnea and sinusitis are worked up as secondaries.

See it before you sit in the room

03Preparation

Know your symptoms and secondary factors

What the report must actually say about allergic & chronic rhinitis (dc 6522) — dc 6522

  • "Has anyone documented whether I have nasal polyps? I would like an endoscopy to check, because polyps are the finding that changes my rating" — get the polyp question explicitly on the record.
  • "I need my nasal obstruction measured and written down as a percentage for each side, without any decongestant in my system today" — force the objective measurement the 10% rating requires.
  • "I held my nasal spray and decongestant before this exam so you can see my true, unmedicated obstruction" — establish that the finding reflects your real baseline.
  • "My blocked nose forces me to breathe through my mouth all night, I snore badly, and I wake up unrefreshed" — open the gateway to the secondary sleep apnea claim.
  • "I served near burn pits / in the Southwest Asia theater from [dates] — my rhinitis should be presumptive under the PACT Act" — put the presumptive exposure pathway on the record.
  • "I also have chronic sinus infections and [asthma/allergies] — I want those evaluated as connected conditions" — flag the paired sinusitis and asthma connections.

Pain level, frequency, lost work and functional loss — how to say them

Asian male veteran in his 40s in a sneezing fit at home holding a tissue with visible nasal irritation

Describe your congestion as constant obstruction, not just a stuffy nose

The 10% rating requires greater than 50% obstruction of both sides or complete obstruction of one side. Describing your blockage in terms of how much airflow you actually lose, and that it persists day and night despite medication, points the examiner toward measuring the obstruction the rating turns on.

Note if one side is completely blocked, or if the blockage switches sides — both are clinically important and map directly onto the rating criteria.

"My nose is blocked almost all the time — most days I cannot move any air at all through my right side, and the left is more than half closed. It does not clear even when I use my spray, and I have to breathe through my mouth."

White female veteran in her 30s holding a tissue to a clear runny nose while seated at home

Report the clear, watery drainage and sneezing as the allergic pattern

Clear rhinorrhea and paroxysmal sneezing are the hallmark of allergic rhinitis and distinguish it from the thick purulent discharge of sinusitis. Describing the pattern and its triggers documents the allergic diagnosis that supports the exposure and presumptive pathways.

Tie the drainage and sneezing to specific triggers — dust, smoke, pollen, or the airborne hazards you were exposed to in service — to reinforce the causation story.

"I have clear water pouring from my nose and sneezing fits several times a day, especially around dust and smoke. It has been like this since I came back from deployment, and no medication fully stops it."

Latino male veteran in his 50s breathing through his mouth with visible nasal congestion and fatigue at home

Describe mouth breathing and disrupted sleep — the gateway to sleep apnea

Chronic nasal obstruction forces mouth breathing and fragments sleep, and this is the single most valuable secondary pathway in a rhinitis claim. Describing how the blockage wrecks your sleep both illustrates the severity of the obstruction and opens the door to a secondary obstructive sleep apnea claim rated under its own code.

If you snore, gasp, or wake unrefreshed, say so plainly and ask for a sleep study — sleep apnea is often where the meaningful compensation lies because rhinitis itself is capped at 30%.

"Because I cannot breathe through my nose, I breathe through my mouth all night, I snore loudly, my spouse says I stop breathing, and I wake up exhausted no matter how long I sleep."

Black female veteran in her 40s rubbing her itchy watering eyes with visible allergic irritation at home

Report the itchy, watery eyes and the daily toll — do not minimize it

Allergic rhinitis rarely comes alone — itchy watery eyes (allergic conjunctivitis), throat irritation, fatigue, and difficulty concentrating are part of the picture. While these do not raise the schedular rating by themselves, documenting the full symptom burden supports the diagnosis, the functional-impact case, and any TDIU argument built on the combined disabilities.

Describe how the symptoms disrupt your day — the constant eye rubbing, the fatigue from poor sleep, the difficulty focusing — so the record reflects the real functional cost.

"My eyes itch and water constantly, my throat is always irritated, and between that and the poor sleep I am worn out and cannot concentrate. It affects everything I try to do during the day."

Secondary conditions to raise in the same appointment

Middle Eastern female veteran in her 40s at an office desk looking congested and fatigued while struggling to work through rhinitis symptoms

Occupational impact and unemployability

Chronic rhinitis with constant obstruction, drainage, and the fatigue of fragmented sleep quietly erodes work capacity. The inability to breathe through the nose, chronic tiredness, difficulty concentrating, and the downstream effects of sleep apnea and sinus disease all take a toll on the job. Because rhinitis itself is capped at 30%, the occupational picture matters most when rhinitis is combined with its secondary conditions. Document the workdays you have lost, the accommodations you have needed, and the tasks you can no longer perform reliably. Veterans whose service-connected conditions — rhinitis plus its secondaries — prevent substantially gainful employment should pursue TDIU, which compensates at the 100% rate even when the schedular rating is lower.

White female veteran in her 50s standing pensively by a window with a reflective expression symbolizing toxic burn-pit exposure during deployment

Burn-pit and airborne-hazard exposure — the PACT Act presumptive

The strongest service-connection pathway for most Gulf War and post-9/11 veterans runs through toxic exposure. Burn pits, sand, dust, and airborne particulates chronically inflame and sensitize the nasal lining, and Congress recognized this by placing chronic rhinitis on the PACT Act presumptive list under §3.320. If you served in the Southwest Asia theater, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, or another qualifying location during the covered periods, your service connection is presumed — diagnosis plus qualifying service, no nexus letter required. Make sure your deployment locations and dates are documented so the presumptive pathway is triggered.

Hispanic male veteran in his 50s consulting with an East Asian female allergist in a medical office as she explains his rhinitis condition

ENT and allergy documentation and the gateway to sleep apnea

A treating ear-nose-throat specialist or allergist carries far more weight than a brief general C&P evaluation. If you see an ENT or allergist, ensure your records include a nasal endoscopy documenting or excluding polyps, a recorded obstruction percentage for each side, CT imaging, and allergy-testing results. Chronic rhinitis is a recognized gateway to obstructive sleep apnea — persistent nasal obstruction forces mouth breathing and disrupts upper-airway patency during sleep — and to chronic sinusitis and migraine headaches. Because rhinitis is capped at 30%, a strong nexus from your ENT connecting rhinitis to secondary sleep apnea, sinusitis, and migraines is where the meaningful compensation is built.

How to prepare for this specific exam

  • Ask your doctor which nasal sprays and decongestants to hold before the C&P exam, and for how long, so the examiner measures your true unmedicated obstruction — never dose right before the exam.
  • Request a nasal endoscopy from your ENT before the exam if polyps have never been formally checked — it is the most reliable way to document the finding that produces 30%.
  • Bring any CT imaging of the sinuses and nasal passages, which objectively documents polyps and the degree of obstruction.
  • Bring your allergy-testing results and your complete medication history — antihistamines, nasal steroids, and decongestants — showing the chronicity of the condition.
  • If you are claiming the PACT Act presumptive, bring documentation of your deployment locations and dates showing qualifying airborne-hazard or burn-pit exposure.
  • Document your sleep symptoms — snoring, gasping, waking unrefreshed, daytime sleepiness — and pursue a sleep study, because sleep apnea secondary to rhinitis is where much of the compensation lies.
  • If claiming secondary to a deviated septum, chronic sinusitis, or asthma, bring your service-connection documentation and a nexus letter explaining the mechanism.

04The Protocol

What procedures are required during the exam

These are not courtesies. Each comes out of the regulation or out of binding case law. Take this list in with you and tick them off as they happen.

Close-up of gloved clinical hands performing a nasal endoscopy on a patient with a thin endoscope inserted into the nostril
Fig. 01Nasal endoscopy — the definitive test for polyps

01Nasal endoscopy — the definitive test for polyps

38 C.F.R. §4.97, Diagnostic Code 6522

Nasal endoscopy uses a thin rigid or flexible scope passed into the nasal passages to directly visualize the deep nasal cavity. It is the most reliable way to detect nasal polyps — the single finding that produces the maximum 30% rating — because polyps often sit deep in the passages where a quick anterior speculum exam cannot see them. Endoscopy also documents turbinate swelling, discharge, and the pathways that are obstructed. If polyps have never been formally checked, an endoscopy before your C&P exam can be the difference between a 0% and a 30% rating.

Polyps documented on endoscopy establish the 30% rating outright, and endoscopy provides the definitive clinical confirmation the Board requires — far stronger than imaging described only as "nodular changes" or "retention cysts."

Native American male veteran lying on a CT scanner table sliding into the imaging ring for a sinus and nasal CT scan in a radiology suite
Fig. 02CT scan of the sinuses and nasal passages

02CT scan of the sinuses and nasal passages

38 C.F.R. §4.97, DC 6522

A CT scan provides objective cross-sectional imaging of the nasal passages and sinuses. It documents nasal polyps, mucosal swelling, and the degree of obstruction, and it identifies coexisting sinus disease that supports the paired sinusitis connection. The CT is powerful corroboration for both the 30% polyp finding and the obstruction that drives the 10% rating, and it is far more objective than a symptom description or a brief speculum look.

CT objectively documents polyps and obstruction and rules in coexisting sinus disease, providing anatomy-backed proof that does not depend on how you happen to feel on exam day.

Close-up of gloved clinical hands using a metal nasal speculum to examine a veteran nasal passage during anterior rhinoscopy
Fig. 03Anterior rhinoscopy and obstruction measurement

03Anterior rhinoscopy and obstruction measurement

38 C.F.R. §4.97, DC 6522 (obstruction criteria)

Anterior rhinoscopy uses a nasal speculum and light to inspect the front of the nasal passages, documenting turbinate hypertrophy, mucosal swelling, discharge, and — critically — the percentage of obstruction on each side. This is the examination that must produce the specific obstruction measurement the 10% rating requires. The examiner should record a percentage for each nostril, measured with your decongestants held so the finding reflects your true unmedicated airway.

The recorded obstruction percentage is the finding that determines the 10% threshold — greater than 50% on both sides or complete on one side. Without a measured percentage in the record, the claim defaults to 0%.

Close-up of gloved clinician hands performing an allergy skin-prick test on the forearm of a male veteran with drops of allergen solution on the skin
Fig. 04Allergy testing — confirming the allergic basis

04Allergy testing — confirming the allergic basis

38 C.F.R. §4.97, DC 6522; §3.303, §3.320

Allergy testing — skin-prick testing or a serum IgE panel — confirms that your rhinitis is allergic and identifies the specific triggers, distinguishing allergic rhinitis from vasomotor (non-allergic) rhinitis. While both are rated under DC 6522, a documented allergic diagnosis strengthens the exposure story, supports the direct and presumptive pathways, and ties your condition to the dust, smoke, and airborne hazards of service. It also guides treatment and documents the chronicity of the condition.

A confirmed allergic diagnosis reinforces the service-exposure and presumptive pathways and documents the chronic, ongoing nature of the disease — strengthening both the connection and the credibility of the claim.

Older white female counselor in a blazer meeting with a younger Latino male veteran across a desk in a professional office for a functional assessment
Fig. 05Functional capacity and occupational impact assessment

05Functional capacity and occupational impact assessment

38 C.F.R. §§4.1, 4.10, 4.97; §4.16 (TDIU)

Beyond the objective nasal findings, the C&P examiner documents how chronic rhinitis — and its secondary sleep apnea, sinusitis, and migraines — affects your daily life and ability to work: the fatigue from fragmented sleep, the difficulty concentrating, the workdays lost, and the toll of chronic mouth breathing and obstruction. Be prepared to describe your worst periods, not your best. Because rhinitis is capped at 30%, this functional documentation is especially important for TDIU claims built on the combined burden of rhinitis and its secondaries.

Functional-impact documentation supports TDIU and captures the combined burden of rhinitis and its secondary conditions — the human cost that a single objective nasal finding cannot convey.

05The Standard

What makes an exam adequate

Read your exam report against these. An exam that fails the standard is legally inadequate, and an inadequate exam is something you challenge rather than accept.

01

The range of motion has to be MEASURED, not estimated

38 CFR §4.46 states that the use of a goniometer in the measurement of limitation of motion is indispensable in examinations conducted within the Department of Veterans Affairs. An examiner who eyeballs your bend and writes a number has not complied with the regulation. This is the most common defect in a spine exam and it is the easiest one to spot from the chair.

02

Joints must be tested in every required condition

Under Correia v. McDonald, a joint examination for pain must, wherever possible, record active motion, passive motion, motion in weight-bearing and motion in non-weight-bearing — and where relevant, the range of the opposite undamaged joint. An exam that records one set of numbers and stops is incomplete on its face, and that incompleteness is grounds to challenge it.

03

Flare-ups have to be addressed, not dodged

Under Sharp v. Shulkin, when a veteran describes flare-ups, the examiner is obligated to estimate the additional loss of motion during a flare based on all the available evidence — including your own account of it. "I cannot opine without resorting to mere speculation" is not automatically acceptable; the examiner has to have actually sought the information first and explained why an estimate is impossible.

04

Repetitive use and functional loss must be factored in

Sections 4.40 and 4.45, and the DeLuca line of cases, require that pain, weakness, fatigability, incoordination and lack of endurance after repeated use be considered — and expressed in additional degrees of lost motion where that is feasible. Your rating is supposed to reflect what you can do on the fifth repetition and on a bad day, not just the first careful bend of the morning.

05

Neurological findings must be separately documented

Note (1) to the General Rating Formula requires that any associated objective neurologic abnormality be evaluated separately under an appropriate diagnostic code. If your leg symptoms were mentioned in the narrative but never tested and never assigned, the exam did not do what the schedule requires of it.

06

The examiner must review the record when the question requires it

Where a medical opinion on cause, aggravation or a secondary relationship was requested, the examiner is expected to review the relevant evidence and give a reasoned explanation. A bare conclusion — "less likely than not related to service" with no reasoning attached — carries little weight, and an opinion with no rationale is challengeable.

07

The examiner has to be qualified for the body system

The VA may use its own clinicians or a contract vendor. Either way, the examiner is expected to have the competence to evaluate the system being examined. If a spinal exam with a neurological component was performed by someone who never tested a reflex, that is a problem worth raising.

08

The exam has to be CURRENT

A rating is supposed to reflect your condition now. An exam performed before a documented worsening, or years before the decision, may not support the current evaluation — and you can request a new one on that basis.

06Afterward

What happens after your exam is complete

The examiner writes the report and submits it, it is reviewed for completeness, and only then does the claim move toward a rating decision. Here is what actually controls the clock.

Examiner at a desk completing and submitting the exam questionnaire
01

The examiner writes and submits the report

Days 1–5 after the exam

The examiner compiles the history, the physical findings, the measurements and any testing into the questionnaire, adds any requested medical opinion, and submits it. Contract vendors typically have a turnaround requirement measured in days, not weeks.

Nothing about your claim moves while this is happening, and nothing you do speeds it up. What matters is that the report is written from notes taken in the room — which is exactly why what you said, and how the examiner recorded it, is already locked in by the time you get to your car. Request your copy now rather than later.

Reviewer flagging an incomplete field and sending the exam report back to the examiner
02

Quality review — and the request for clarification

Days 3–30

The report is reviewed for completeness. If it is internally inconsistent, missing a required field or missing the opinion the VA asked for, it goes back for correction or a second opinion. This is the single most common cause of a claim appearing to stall after the exam.

Understand what a finished exam actually means: it means the appointment happened, not that your claim is ready for a decision. If the reviewer finds a blank range-of-motion field, an opinion that does not answer the question that was asked, or findings that contradict each other, the file goes back out for more information. That is a normal quality control step, not a rejection of your claim, and it is not a sign that you did something wrong — but it does add weeks, and it is the reason so much of what you read online sounds like the system is broken.

Claim status tracker on a screen showing the progress bar jumped backward from a late step to an early step
03

Your status tracker moves backward — and it is usually not bad news

Any time after the exam

The online tracker shows eight steps. Veterans watch it reach step 7 or 8, then find it back at step 3 or 4 a week later. That regression almost always means one thing: the file went back for additional information, most often a returned or clarified exam.

This is the number one thing veterans panic about, and it is misread constantly. The tracker is not a countdown — it is a location marker. When the VA decides it needs one more piece of evidence, a corrected exam, a clarifying medical opinion or an outstanding record, the claim is routed back to the evidence gathering step and the bar redraws itself where the file physically is. It does not mean a denial. It does not mean your case was thrown out or restarted. It does not erase anything already in the file, and it does not change your effective date. What it does mean is that something in the record was not good enough to decide on yet — which is worth knowing, because if the weak link is the exam, this is the window where a corrective statement or a private opinion from your own doctor does the most good.

Medical records folders being handed across a counter as the evidence gathering window closes
04

Evidence gathering closes

Varies

Before anyone rates your claim, the file has to be built. This is the stretch where the Regional Office pulls together everything the decision will rest on: your service treatment records, your VA medical records, any federal records, the C&P exam report, and any private records it has requested on your behalf. The claim sits here until the VA is satisfied the record is complete enough to decide — which is exactly why a status tracker can appear to stall or slide backward at this step. You are not powerless while it sits here. Anything you put into the file yourself lands the day you send it, and every relevant record you add now is one less thing the rater can later say was missing.

A VA request to a private provider is a letter that may or may not be answered, and the VA will wait on it for weeks before moving on — sometimes without ever getting a response. A record you walk in yourself, or upload through your claim, is in the file the day you send it. So do not sit and wait to be asked. If you know a treatment record, an imaging report, a surgical note or a buddy statement exists and it matters, send it now, with a VA Form 21-4138 statement that explains in plain words what the document is and what it shows. This is also the window where a corrective statement or a private medical opinion from your own doctor does the most good — before the rater has locked in a decision, not after. Once the evidence gathering step closes, the file goes to a rating specialist, and your chance to shape the record cheaply and quickly closes with it.

Rating specialist applying the rating schedule to a file and producing the decision letter
05

Rating decision and promulgation

Typically several weeks after the last piece of evidence lands

This is the stage where your evidence finally becomes a number. A rating specialist — not the examiner, and not a doctor — takes everything in the file and applies the rating schedule to it: the exam findings, your range-of-motion measurements, your lay statements, your private records and any medical opinions. They assign a diagnostic code to each condition, pull a percentage from the schedule, set your effective date, and either grant, deny or defer each issue. The decision is then reviewed and authorized — promulgation is simply the VA’s word for making it official — and the decision letter and code sheet are generated and mailed. Where an award is made, payment follows the effective date rules, and back pay is calculated to that date.

Read the code sheet, not just the percentage. It names the diagnostic code used, the exact measurements relied on and the effective date assigned — and that is where most mistakes live. This is a human being reading a file under a production quota, and the two things that go wrong most often are a rater using the pre-repetition range-of-motion numbers instead of the worst-case figures §4.59 and §4.40 require, and a claimed condition being decided on a thin record or quietly left out. Check whether painful motion was accounted for, whether your radiculopathy was rated separately under Note (1) or folded into the spine rating, and whether every condition you claimed was actually addressed. A decision you do not read is a decision you cannot challenge — and the deadline to challenge it starts the day the letter is dated, not the day you understand it.

Opened rating decision letter with a magnifying glass over the reasons for decision section
06

C&P examination is the decision letter

The day it lands in your mailbox

The envelope holds two different documents: the narrative decision letter, and the code sheet. Together they are the single most important piece of paper in your claim, because every deadline, every appeal option and every dollar of back pay is set by what is printed on them — not by what you were told at the exam.

Most veterans read one thing on that letter: the percentage. Then they either celebrate it or get angry at it, and file it in a drawer. That is the mistake. The percentage is the conclusion; the reasons section is the reasoning, and the reasoning is what you attack. It tells you which diagnostic code the rater used, which range-of-motion figures they relied on and which they ignored, whether painful motion under §4.59 was accounted for, whether your neurological findings were rated separately under Note (1) or folded into the spine rating, which conditions were decided, which were deferred, and which were never addressed at all. It also assigns your effective date, which controls back pay. A rating that looks low is very often not a disagreement about how bad your neck is — it is a rater who used the pre-repetition numbers, or missed the radiculopathy, or rated one side and not both. You cannot see any of that from the percentage. Do not go by the percentage alone, and do not decode it by yourself if you are not sure what you are looking at — have someone who reads these for a living read it with you before the clock runs out. You have one year from the date on that letter to file a Higher-Level Review (VA Form 20-0996), a Supplemental Claim (VA Form 20-0995) or a Board appeal, and the deadline runs from the date printed on the letter, not the date you opened it. Bring it to this office and we will go through it line by line, at no cost, and tell you plainly whether it is right.

What normal looks like: 30 to 60 days for a simple claim, longer for a complex one

After your exam you should expect some kind of notification from the VA — a decision, a request for more information, or a notice that another exam has been scheduled. For a straightforward, single-issue claim that often lands within 30 to 60 days. But 30 to 60 days is a rough guide, not a rule, and it is not a ceiling. A claim with several conditions, a toxic-exposure or presumptive question, a returned exam, or missing records routinely takes 90 days or more, and that alone does not mean anything is wrong — the more moving parts your case has, the longer the VA takes to work it. Inside the window that is normal for a case like yours, silence is expected and there is nothing to fix, and a tracker that jumps backward is normal too.

What matters is not a fixed number of days — it is whether the claim is still moving and whether you can get a straight answer about where it is. Once you are well past what is normal for a case like yours and the VA either goes silent or cannot tell you what the claim is waiting on, stop waiting. That is usually where the real trouble hides — an exam that came back twice, a records request that was never answered, a claimed condition that got dropped, or a file sitting in the wrong queue. Call the VA at 800-827-1000, ask specifically what the claim is waiting on and who it is assigned to, and write down the answer. If you cannot get a straight answer, or the answer tells you the exam is the problem, that is the moment to bring it to this office rather than sitting on it for another three months. Problems raised early get fixed inside the claim. Problems discovered in a denial letter get fixed on appeal, and that costs you a year.

Other things that control the clock

Six things decide how long you wait, and none of them are visible from the tracker alone.

VA claim status page on a monitor showing an average days to complete figure with a trend line that changes month to month
01

The average is a moving number

Check it at the source, not second-hand

The VA publishes an average days-to-complete figure for disability claims that moves month to month; check the current number on the VA’s own claim status page rather than relying on any second-hand figure. In practice, most veterans see a decision somewhere between roughly three and eight months from the date the claim was filed, with the exam usually falling in the middle of that window.

Process pipeline showing the exam marked complete at the start followed by evidence gathering, rating decision and authorization still ahead
02

The exam is not the last step

Three stages still sit in front of you

The exam is not the last step. The clock does not start at the exam and it does not stop there either — the claim still has to clear evidence gathering, the rating decision and authorization.

Exam report stamped returned for clarification beside a claim tracker whose progress bar is moving backward
03

A returned exam is the invisible delay

The reason a tracker slides backward

A returned or clarified exam is the most common invisible delay, and it is why a tracker can slide backward. Expect some contact from the VA within 30 to 60 days of the exam. Past 60 days with nothing at all, call and ask specifically what the claim is waiting on.

Calendar with days 30 through 60 shaded as the normal window and everything past day 60 shaded red beside the VA benefits phone number
04

30 to 60 days is a guide, not a deadline

A complex case can take 90 days or more

Thirty to sixty days is a rough average for a simple, single-issue claim — not a hard rule and not a ceiling. A claim with several conditions, a presumptive or toxic-exposure question, a returned exam, or missing records can easily take 90 days or more, and that alone does not mean anything is wrong. Watch whether the claim is still moving, not the calendar. Only when it stalls well past what is normal for a case like yours, and no one can tell you what it is waiting on, should you stop waiting — call 800-827-1000 and ask what the claim is waiting on and who it is assigned to.

Three ways to track a claim shown side by side: the VA.gov claim status page, the VA Health and Benefits mobile app, and the benefits telephone line
05

Watch your status yourself — in one of three places

Weekly, not daily

Check your own status in one of three places: your VA.gov claim status page, the VA Health and Benefits mobile app, or by calling 800-827-1000. Check it weekly, not daily. And understand exactly what a status check can tell you: if a decision is posted in your account, it is live; if it is not posted, it is not ready. That is the whole rule. This is not something your representative or your attorney can speed up — we see the same thing you see, at the same time, and calling us to ask does not move it. Calling the VA to ask for an update does not move it either. Watch it yourself, weekly, and the moment a decision posts, bring it to us.

Flat infographic of a VA rating decision letter held beside a calendar stamped ONE YEAR TO APPEAL, with the three appeal lanes — Higher-Level Review, Supplemental Claim and Board Appeal — labeled below
06

Your decision letter arrives — read it, then start the appeal clock

What to do the day it lands in your mailbox

The decision letter is the finish line of the claim and the starting line of the appeal — and the moment it arrives, a one-year clock starts running. Read it the same day. Find the combined rating, the percentage assigned to each condition, and the effective date, because the effective date controls how far back your back pay reaches. Then request a copy of your C&P exam report so you can see whether the rater used your real range-of-motion numbers or ignored the radiculopathy. If any part of the decision is wrong — a low rating, a denied condition, or a bad effective date — you have three appeal lanes, and you must choose one within one year of the date printed on the letter: a **Higher-Level Review (VA Form 20-0996)**, where a senior reviewer re-decides on the same evidence; a **Supplemental Claim (VA Form 20-0995)**, when you have new and relevant evidence such as a private DBQ or your own range-of-motion exam; or a **Board Appeal (VA Form 10182)** to a Veterans Law Judge. Miss that one-year deadline and the decision becomes final. You can still file again later, but you lose the original effective date — and that lost time is lost back pay you never get back. Bring the letter to this office before the year runs out and we will read it with you, line by line, at no cost.

07Remedy

How to report a bad exam

Where this exam goes wrong

The biggest trap in a rhinitis claim is an **exam with no objective measurement**. Because the rating is built on polyps and a measured obstruction percentage, an examiner who simply writes "rhinitis, controlled on medication" — without checking for polyps and without recording an obstruction percentage — leaves the rater with nothing to grant above 0%. The second trap is **using decongestants before the exam**: sprays and oral decongestants shrink the swollen tissue and make your obstruction look far milder than it is, so a veteran with real 60% obstruction hands the examiner a clear airway and gets 0%. The third trap is the **polyp-versus-nodule distinction**: imaging that describes "nodular changes" or "retention cysts" is not the same as documented nasal polyps, and the Board has denied 30% ratings for exactly this gap — insist on definitive clinical confirmation of polyps, ideally by endoscopy. The fourth trap is **stopping at the 30% ceiling**: because rhinitis is capped at 30%, veterans who do not pursue the secondary sleep apnea, sinusitis, and migraine claims leave the majority of their potential compensation on the table. The fifth trap is **missing the presumptive path**: if you have qualifying burn-pit or airborne-hazard exposure, your chronic rhinitis is presumptive under the PACT Act — no nexus letter needed.

Flat infographic of a hand writing exam notes on a notepad inside a car with a clock recording the time
01

Write it down the moment you get to your car

Date, start time, end time, the examiner’s name and credentials, the vendor, every test that was performed, and every test that was not. A contemporaneous note written the same day is evidence. A memory reconstructed four months later is not.

Flat infographic of a C&P exam report and a DBQ questionnaire being requested through VA.gov and by phone
02

Get the exam report and the questionnaire

Request a copy through VA.gov, through a written request to the Regional Office, or by calling 800-827-1000. You cannot challenge what you have not read. Compare it line by line against what actually happened in the room.

Flat infographic of a magnifying glass over a document with a defect circled in red and a regulation citation tag
03

Name the defect specifically, with the citation

Never write "the exam was unfair." Write "no goniometer was used, contrary to 38 CFR §4.46" or "flare-ups were reported and not addressed, contrary to Sharp v. Shulkin" or "repetitive use testing was not performed, contrary to 38 CFR §4.40 and DeLuca." A specific, citable defect is what forces action.

Flat infographic of VA Form 21-4138 Statement in Support of Claim being submitted with an upload arrow
04

Submit a statement asking for a new examination

VA Form 21-4138, Statement in Support of Claim, filed through VA.gov or mailed to the Evidence Intake Center. State the defect, cite the authority, and request a new or supplemental examination. Do this BEFORE the decision if the claim is still open — it is far easier than undoing a decision afterward.

Flat infographic of two separate tracks, one labeled Patient Advocate for conduct and one labeled Exam Adequacy
05

Report examiner conduct separately

If the problem is behavior rather than methodology — you were rushed out, dismissed, never touched, or treated with hostility — file a complaint with the VA facility’s Patient Advocate, or with the vendor directly for a contract exam, and copy the Regional Office. Conduct complaints and adequacy challenges are two different tracks and you can run both.

Flat infographic of a signpost forking between Higher-Level Review 20-0996 and Supplemental Claim 20-0995
06

If a decision has already issued, pick the right lane

A Higher-Level Review (VA Form 20-0996) argues the VA erred on the evidence it had — the right vehicle when the exam was inadequate on its face. A Supplemental Claim (VA Form 20-0995) is the vehicle when you are adding new and relevant evidence, such as your own private range-of-motion examination or a completed DBQ from your treating provider.

Flat infographic of a goniometer measuring a joint angle beside a completed DBQ showing range-of-motion degrees
07

Put your own measurements on the table

A private examination with full goniometric measurements, or a DBQ completed by your own provider, creates a conflict in the evidence that the VA has to resolve — and under 38 CFR §3.102 reasonable doubt is resolved in your favor.

End of clinical section

Allergic & Chronic Rhinitis (DC 6522) — DC 6522

See It Before You Sit In The Room

Allergic Rhinitis VA Disability Ratings & Service Connection

VA Claims Insider

VA Disability Rating for Rhinitis — What Veterans Need to Know

Veterans Guide

The Questions Veterans Actually Ask

Allergic & Chronic Rhinitis (DC 6522) Claims — Frequently Asked Questions

Straight answers to the questions that decide allergic & chronic rhinitis (dc 6522) claims — the ratings, the separate evaluations, and the exam mistakes that cost veterans money.

Allergic & Chronic Rhinitis (DC 6522) is evaluated under DC 6522. The scale runs across 3 rating levels, and the highest is 30%, which the VA assigns for: allergic or vasomotor rhinitis with nasal polyps. This is the maximum schedular rating under DC 6522; once polyps are documented, no percentage of obstruction is required. Where your evaluation actually lands depends on how your exam and records document those criteria — not on how bad the condition feels on an average day.

Open A Channel

Three Ways to Put an Accredited Agent on Your Case

No fee unless you win. An accredited agent #45147 personally reviews every request — we respond within 48 hours.