You served. The VA owes you a debt it does not volunteer to pay. Everything here is free. When you need an accredited agent in your corner, we are right here.

Crisis Line: 988702-992-4883
The VA DisabilityADVOCATE

What The VA Won’t Put In Writing

Declassified

Description

We decode the evidence rules, exam traps, and rating tricks the VA won’t spell out, then fight to win what you earned.

Notes

Information here is free. Optional accredited representation, no fees unless you win.

VA-ACCREDITED CLAIMS AGENT #45147DENIALS REOPENEDLOW RATINGS CHALLENGEDC&P EXAMS AUDITEDEFFECTIVE-DATE & CUE HUNTSTDIU · SMC · PACT ACTNO WIN, NO FEE ON 20% OR 30% REPRESENTATION · $750 FLAT MISSION 5 BRIEFGOVERNED BY 38 CFR §14.636SECONDARY CONDITIONS LINKEDTERA & TOXIC-EXPOSURE CLAIMSBOARD & HIGHER-LEVEL APPEALSFREE CASE REVIEW, ASK A QUESTIONVA-ACCREDITED CLAIMS AGENT #45147DENIALS REOPENEDLOW RATINGS CHALLENGEDC&P EXAMS AUDITEDEFFECTIVE-DATE & CUE HUNTSTDIU · SMC · PACT ACTNO WIN, NO FEE ON 20% OR 30% REPRESENTATION · $750 FLAT MISSION 5 BRIEFGOVERNED BY 38 CFR §14.636SECONDARY CONDITIONS LINKEDTERA & TOXIC-EXPOSURE CLAIMSBOARD & HIGHER-LEVEL APPEALSFREE CASE REVIEW, ASK A QUESTION
Solitary East Asian female veteran sitting alone in shadow by a window, looking away with quiet reflective dignity, in soft window light
MST & Personal Assault, all conditions
§3.304(f)(5), §4.130, DC 9411/9434 · #45147

MST & Personal Assault Claims

Military Sexual Trauma claims do not require a police report. Under 38 CFR §3.304(f)(5) the VA must consider behavioral markers, transfer requests, performance drops, substance use onset, and contemporaneous disclosure, as alternative evidence to corroborate the assault. These markers are usually already in the service record. They have to be found and framed.

The single biggest myth about MST claims is that you needed to report the assault at the time. Section 3.304(f)(5) was written precisely because assaults go unreported. The regulation allows behavioral markers, changes in your service record that coincide with the event, to corroborate the stressor without a police report. Your advocate identifies every marker in the file you may not realize is there, prepares the stressor statement that connects them, and makes sure the C&P examiner applies the correct evidentiary standard.

The Law That Governs This38 CFR §3.303, Direct Service Connection38 CFR §3.310, Secondary Service Connection38 CFR §4.3, Reasonable Doubt§3.304(f)(5), §4.130, DC 9411/9434, Diagnostic Code

Before Anything Gets Rated

What The VA Is Actually Looking For, And What Service Connection Really Means

Before the VA ever opens the rating schedule, it asks one question: is this disability the government’s responsibility? That is what “service connection” means. It is not a diagnosis, it is not sympathy, and it is not a reward for having served. It is a legal finding that a current, diagnosed disability is linked to something that happened to you in uniform. Percentages come later. If service connection is not established, there is nothing to rate and the claim is denied, no matter how bad the mst & personal assault is.

Service connection for MST & Personal Assault Claims: the link between your service record and a current diagnosis

For MST & Personal Assault Specifically

For MST claims, the VA needs a formal psychiatric diagnosis, PTSD (DC 9411) or another MST-related condition such as major depressive disorder or anxiety disorder (DC 9434), written into a medical record by a qualified clinician, connected by a nexus opinion to the in-service assault. The in-service event does not require a contemporaneous report, a police report, or a conviction; under §3.304(f)(5), the assault itself is corroborated through behavioral markers already embedded in your service record, a unit transfer request, a sudden drop in performance evaluations, a disciplinary action that coincides with the assault timeframe, a medical visit for injuries or STIs, or a documented onset of substance use. This is almost always won as a direct service connection claim, not secondary or presumptive, because the regulation was specifically written to create a direct pathway for assault survivors. M21-1, Part III, Subpart iv, Chapter 4, Section H (Mental Disorders) and Part IV, Subpart ii, Chapter 1, Section D (PTSD/Personal Assault Claims) require the rater to actively search the claims file for these markers rather than waiting for the veteran to produce them, but in practice, raters miss them unless an advocate frames the record. The C&P examiner must apply the §3.102 benefit-of-the-doubt standard when evaluating whether the stressor occurred, meaning if the evidence is in approximate balance, the veteran wins that element.

The three elements the VA must find. All three. Every time.

These come out of Caluza v. Brown and Shedden v. Principi, and they are the checklist a rating officer works through on your file. Miss one and the claim fails on that element alone.

1

A current, diagnosed disability

A doctor has to have written a diagnosis in a medical record, posttraumatic stress disorder secondary to military sexual trauma, major depressive disorder with PTSD features related to in-service personal assault, anxiety disorder NOS with trauma etiology, or adjustment disorder with chronic PTSD features. Symptoms by themselves are not a disability the VA can rate. Saunders v. Wilkie held that pain causing functional impairment can be a disability, but you still need a clinician to document it as diagnosed and impairing. The diagnosis must exist now, during the claim period, not only years ago.

2

An in-service event, injury, illness or aggravation

Something in service had to have happened, an injury, an exposure, a documented sick call, or steady wear over a career. It does not have to be one dramatic moment and it does not have to be spelled out in your service treatment records: buddy statements, unit records, performance evaluations and your own competent lay testimony can establish it.

3

A medical nexus linking the two

A qualified medical opinion that says the current diagnosis is at least as likely as not related to the in-service event. That phrase matters: at least as likely as not means 50 percent or better. Under 38 C.F.R. §3.102, when the evidence is evenly balanced, the benefit of the doubt goes to you and the claim must be granted.

The five ways service connection is established

Most veterans only know the first one. The other routes are lower-effort paths to the same grant, and the secondary route is the one most often left on the table.

Direct, 38 C.F.R. §3.303(a)

The injury or disease began in service and never went away. The classic route: three elements, one nexus opinion.

Chronicity and continuity, §3.303(b)

A chronic condition shown in service, plus continuity of the same symptoms from separation to now, can establish the link without a formal nexus opinion. Your own testimony about symptoms you can observe is competent evidence.

Presumptive, §3.307 and §3.309

Certain chronic diseases are presumed service connected if they manifest to a compensable degree within a set window after separation. You do not have to prove causation at all.

Secondary, §3.310(a) and (b)

A disability proximately due to, or aggravated by, an already service-connected condition is itself service connected. This is how MST-related PTSD causing secondary major depressive disorder, alcohol use disorder, or chronic pain syndrome; MST-related anxiety disorder causing secondary insomnia disorder or sexual dysfunction; or MST-related PTSD as the primary condition with secondary somatic symptom disorder and relationship/occupational impairment get on the rating sheet.

Aggravation of a pre-service condition, §3.306

If you entered service with a condition and service made it permanently worse, the increase is compensable. The VA must rebut the presumption of soundness by clear and unmistakable evidence, a bar it frequently fails to meet.

VA medical care, 38 U.S.C. §1151

An additional disability caused by VA treatment, surgery, or a failure to diagnose is compensated as if it were service connected.

The bottom line, there is no way around this

No diagnosis, no rating. It has to be chronic. It has to cause impairment.

Without a diagnosis, the VA will not rate your claim.

If no clinician has written a diagnosis of PTSD, MDD, anxiety disorder, or another recognized psychiatric condition tied to the assault, the VA has nothing to rate, symptoms alone are not a ratable disability. Veterans frequently lose at this step because they have years of therapy notes describing trauma reactions but no treating provider has ever written a formal DSM-5 diagnosis with an explicit connection to the in-service event. The diagnosis must name the condition and the etiology, 'PTSD related to MST' is the language that opens the rating, not 'patient reports trauma history.'

The condition must be chronic.

MST-related psychiatric conditions must be shown as chronic, not situational or resolved, a single crisis note from 2009 with no follow-up treatment history gives the VA room to argue the condition remitted. A documented continuing history of symptoms, treatment, and functional impact across time is what forces the rater to assign a compensable rating rather than a non-compensable 0%. If your treatment has been sporadic, gaps in care will be used against you unless explained, homelessness, avoidance behavior, and inability to access care are themselves symptoms of PTSD and must be documented as such.

It must cause actual impairment.

Under §4.130 and DC 9411/9434, impairment is measured by occupational and social functioning, how the condition affects your ability to work, maintain relationships, and handle daily tasks, not just how bad the trauma feels internally. The zero-percent trap is a diagnosis with no documented functional loss: the VA acknowledges the condition exists but rates it non-compensable because the record shows no missed work, no relationship breakdown, no treatment-seeking, and no examiner-documented symptoms affecting daily life. A C&P examiner who checks 'mild or transient' impairment boxes locks you into 0% or 10% regardless of your actual suffering, the examiner's functional assessment is the rating, so every symptom cluster must be connected to a concrete functional consequence.

What this means for you before you file: Before you file, identify every behavioral marker in your service record, transfers, performance drops, disciplinary actions, medical visits, that falls near the assault timeframe, and get a current formal psychiatric diagnosis in writing that names MST as the etiology. Those two pieces, combined with a stressor statement that connects the markers to the event, are the foundation the entire claim is built on. Under Pentecost v. Principi, unit records documenting the stressor event can corroborate your testimony without naming you individually. Mauerhan v. Principi confirms the §4.130 symptom lists are illustrative, not exhaustive, unlisted symptoms showing equivalent impairment support a higher rating.

The Percentages

General Rating Formula for Mental Disorders

Mental health conditions are rated under the same formula regardless of diagnosis, PTSD, major depressive disorder, anxiety. The percentage is determined by the degree of occupational and social impairment, not the label. Under §3.304(f)(5), the evidentiary standard for establishing the stressor is relaxed for personal assault claims, markers replace the combat-stressor requirement.

American flag representing the service and sacrifice of veterans filing MST claims

0%

A mental condition has been formally diagnosed, but symptoms are not severe enough to interfere with occupational and social functioning or to require continuous medication.

10%

Occupational and social impairment due to mild or transient symptoms which decrease work efficiency only during periods of significant stress, or symptoms controlled by continuous medication.

30%

Occupational and social impairment with occasional decrease in work efficiency and intermittent periods of inability to perform tasks, due to such symptoms as depressed mood, anxiety, suspiciousness, weekly panic attacks, chronic sleep impairment, and mild memory loss.

50%

Reduced reliability and productivity due to such symptoms as flattened affect; circumstantial or stereotyped speech; panic attacks more than once a week; difficulty understanding complex commands; impaired judgment and abstract thinking; disturbances of motivation and mood; and difficulty establishing effective work and social relationships.

70%

Deficiencies in most areas, work, school, family relations, judgment, thinking or mood, due to such symptoms as suicidal ideation; obsessional rituals; near-continuous panic or depression; impaired impulse control; neglect of personal hygiene; and inability to establish and maintain effective relationships.

100%

Total occupational and social impairment, due to such symptoms as gross impairment in thought processes or communication; persistent delusions or hallucinations; grossly inappropriate behavior; persistent danger of hurting self or others; disorientation to time or place; and memory loss for names of close relatives, own occupation, or own name.

Service Connection

Advice from the Advocate

This is where I stop explaining the rules and tell you how I would build your MST & Personal Assault claim if you were sitting across my desk. Read the causation notes below twice. The VA will not connect the dots for you, even though 38 CFR 3.159 says it has a duty to assist. Your job is to put the in-service event, the current diagnosis and the medical link on paper, then make the examiner deal with all three.

Medical illustration of the brain highlighting trauma-response regions including amygdala and hippocampus
The neurobiological connection between trauma and PTSD, the amygdala (threat detection) and hippocampus (memory processing) are structurally and functionally altered by sexual trauma, producing the hypervigilance, intrusive memories, and avoidance that drive the rating under §4.130.

The advocate's notes on causation, MST & Personal Assault

The separate arguments that decide this code: where the VA will attack, the regulation that answers it, and the evidence that closes the gap.

  1. 1The Markers Bridge

    Service records showing behavioral changes that coincide with the reported assault, transfer requests, performance declines, increased leave, substance use onset, unexplained disciplinary action, corroborate the stressor under §3.304(f)(5) without a formal report.

  2. 2Contemporaneous Disclosure

    Statements from family members, friends, clergy, or fellow service members you told at or near the time of the event are competent lay evidence of the stressor and carry significant weight when no official report exists.

  3. 3The Stressor Statement

    Your own written account connecting the in-service assault to the behavioral markers in the record and to your current psychiatric symptoms. This is the narrative backbone of the claim, it has to be detailed, consistent, and connect the dots the VA will not connect on its own.

  4. 4Clinical Nexus Opinion

    A psychiatrist or psychologist opinion stating it is at least as likely as not that the current PTSD (or other mental health condition) is causally related to the in-service personal assault, applying the §3.304(f)(5) markers standard rather than the combat-stressor standard.

  5. 5Secondary Conditions

    Each comorbid condition, depression, anxiety, eating disorders, substance use, sexual dysfunction, chronic pain, migraines, insomnia, requires its own nexus opinion under §3.310, stating the service-connected MST-related PTSD caused or aggravated the secondary condition.

Exposure & Aggravation

The §3.304(f)(5) Markers Standard

A dim barracks hallway at night

The VA wants an in-service event, and most veterans think that means one dramatic injury. It does not. Years of duty that wore the body down count too, and under 38 CFR 3.306 a condition service made worse can still be connected. Find yourself in the list below, then put that duty in writing with dates, units and names. The board only weighs what you put on paper.

How veterans pick this up in uniform, MST & Personal Assault

Unlike combat-related PTSD claims that require verification of a specific stressor event, personal assault claims under §3.304(f)(5) use a relaxed evidentiary standard. The VA must consider behavioral markers as alternative evidence: transfer requests, performance drops, increased leave or sick call, substance use onset, relationship problems, disciplinary actions, pregnancy tests or STI screening, chaplain visits, and statements from people told at the time. The VA is also required to notify you that you may submit this type of evidence. If they denied your claim without considering markers, that denial is challengeable.

  • Sexual assault or attempted sexual assault during military service
  • Sexual harassment that was threatening, repeated, or created a hostile environment
  • Unwanted sexual contact in any military setting, training, deployment, garrison, or off-duty
  • Experiences that occurred regardless of whether they were reported at the time
  • Events corroborated by behavioral markers in service records rather than formal reports

Who is most prone to it

Any veteran who experienced sexual assault or sexual harassment during military service. MST affects veterans of all genders, ranks, branches, and eras. The VA recognizes that the majority of assaults go unreported, §3.304(f)(5) was created specifically to address this reality.

The Symptoms

What MST & Personal Assault Actually Feels Like

Read this list the way the examiner will. Every symptom you live with but never report is a symptom the VA treats as if it does not exist. The rating schedule pays for how MST & Personal Assault affects your daily life and your work, so the details matter. Check off what matches your day, tell your doctor in those words, and make sure it lands in your treatment record before the exam.

A veteran in his 50s sitting alone in a dim room, staring ahead
  • Hypervigilance, exaggerated startle response, and persistent anxiety
  • Avoidance of people, places, or situations that trigger trauma memories
  • Intrusive thoughts, flashbacks, or nightmares related to the assault
  • Emotional numbing, detachment, or difficulty trusting others
  • Sleep disturbance, insomnia, or night terrors
  • Depression, hopelessness, or suicidal ideation
  • Difficulty maintaining work performance or interpersonal relationships
  • Substance use as a coping mechanism
  • Sexual dysfunction or intimacy avoidance
  • Chronic pain, headaches, or somatic complaints without clear medical cause

How this one is rated

Occupational and social impairment under the General Rating Formula for Mental Disorders (38 CFR §4.130)

What you are measured against

The percentage is not driven by the diagnosis, it is driven by how much the condition impairs your work and social life. The VA measures each percentage against specific criteria describing your level of occupational and social impairment, from mild symptoms controlled by medication (10%) to total occupational and social impairment (100%).

Each One On Its Own Page

Secondary Conditions, Aggravated or Caused by a Current Service-Connected Condition

Under 38 CFR §3.310(a), a disability that is proximately due to a service-connected condition is service-connected in its own right, and under §3.310(b), so is any additional disability caused when a service-connected condition aggravates a problem you already had. Each condition below is a separate evaluation with its own diagnostic code and its own percentage. They do not fold into the mst & personal assault rating, they stack on top of it. A veteran who claims only the primary condition leaves these ratings on the table.

South Asian male veteran looking at sunrise from porch, representing hope and recovery

Secondary Depression & Anxiety

Major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder are the most common comorbid conditions with MST-related PTSD. Each is separately ratable under §3.310 when a nexus opinion establishes the service-connected PTSD caused or aggravated the depression or anxiety. The VA will not develop these secondary links for you, you must claim and document each one individually.

White female veteran in counseling session with therapist in professional office setting

Substance Use & Eating Disorders

Self-medication through alcohol, drugs, or disordered eating is a well-documented trauma response. Onset of substance use after the assault is itself a behavioral marker under §3.304(f)(5) that corroborates the stressor, and the resulting substance use disorder or eating disorder is separately claimable as secondary to the MST-related PTSD under §3.310.

Black male veteran walking with service dog in park, representing emotional support and coping

Sexual Dysfunction & Chronic Pain

Sexual dysfunction, including intimacy avoidance, arousal disorders, and pain conditions, is directly connected to the trauma and is separately ratable. Chronic pain conditions (migraines, fibromyalgia, somatic complaints) are frequently comorbid with PTSD. Each requires its own nexus opinion under §3.310 connecting it to the service-connected MST-related PTSD.

Accredited Claims Agent #45147

Ready To Get This Rated Correctly?

You have read how the VA rates MST & Personal Assault. Now the question is whether your file proves it. We represent veterans on a No Win, No Fee basis: 20% Direct-Pay paid by the VA from back pay, or 30% High-Complexity, and you owe nothing for representation if your rating does not increase. If you only need the roadmap, the Mission 5 Brief is a separate $750 flat fee. You bring the records, we build the argument.

MST & Personal Assault, In Detail

MST & Personal Assault, Service Connection In Depth

Here is each claimable condition in this group on its own terms, what it is, what service did to it, and what the VA requires before it will connect it.

Black female veteran representing the strength and resilience of MST survivors pursuing their claims
§3.304(f)(5), §4.130, DC 9411/9434

MST & Personal Assault Claims

The single biggest myth about MST claims is that you needed to report the assault at the time. Section 3.304(f)(5) was written precisely because assaults go unreported. The regulation allows behavioral markers, changes in your service record that coincide with the event, to corroborate the stressor without a police report. Your advocate identifies every marker in the file you may not realize is there, prepares the stressor statement that connects them, and makes sure the C&P examiner applies the correct evidentiary standard.

You are reading this page now

The C&P Exam

What To Expect At The MST & Personal Assault Exam

This is the encounter your rating is built on. The examiner has a checklist and a limited window, what follows is exactly what happens in that room, so none of it surprises you.

Clinical Section, What To Expect at the Exam

The MST & Personal Assault C&P Examination

What to expect, what to bring, and how the markers standard changes this exam

This exam is governed by a special evidentiary rule. Under §3.304(f)(5) the VA cannot deny a personal assault claim solely because the assault was never formally reported, it must consider alternative evidence called markers, and it must give you notice that you may submit them. You can request a same-gender examiner, and you should.

Condition

MST & Personal Assault, §3.304(f)(5), §4.130, DC 9411/9434

Governing questionnaire

VA Form 21-0960P-3, Review Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Disability Benefits Questionnaire, applied under the §3.304(f)(5) personal assault markers standard

Click the form number to open the official questionnaire on VA.gov.

01In The Room

What happens during the exam

The tests and maneuvers for this condition

  • Clinical interview under the §3.304(f)(5) markers standard (trauma-informed)
  • DSM-5 diagnostic criteria assessment for PTSD and comorbid conditions
  • Review of behavioral markers in service records (transfers, performance, leave, substance use)
  • Occupational and social impairment assessment under §4.130 General Rating Formula
  • Evaluation of contemporaneous disclosure evidence (lay statements, chaplain visits)
  • Assessment of secondary conditions: depression, anxiety, eating disorders, sexual dysfunction, chronic pain

What gets measured, and to what number

Occupational Impairment

Assessed under the General Rating Formula, how the condition affects work reliability, productivity, attendance, and relationships with coworkers and supervisors.

Social Functioning

Ability to maintain family relationships, friendships, and community involvement. Isolation, avoidance, and difficulty trusting others are key indicators.

Behavioral Markers Review

The examiner must review and address the behavioral markers in the service record, transfer requests, performance changes, disciplinary actions, substance use onset, as part of the stressor corroboration.

Symptom Severity

Frequency and severity of PTSD symptoms: intrusive thoughts, nightmares, flashbacks, hypervigilance, emotional numbing, and avoidance behaviors.

Functional Capacity

Activities of daily living, self-care, judgment, impulse control, and the ability to adapt to stressful circumstances including work-like settings.

Comorbid Conditions

Separate documentation of depression, anxiety, eating disorders, substance use, sexual dysfunction, chronic pain, migraines, and sleep disturbances, each is a potential secondary claim.

02Orientation

What to expect during this exam

What makes this exam different from every other C&P exam

1Same-Gender Examiner Request

Submit a written request in advance for an examiner of the gender you are most comfortable with. This request is routinely granted and is your right under the trauma-informed examination procedures.

2Markers Standard Application

The examiner must apply the §3.304(f)(5) markers standard, not the ordinary combat-stressor standard. If they do not mention markers in the report, flag it as an inadequate exam. The regulation requires consideration of behavioral changes, transfer requests, performance drops, and alternative evidence sources.

3Trauma-Informed Interview

You have the right to pause or stop the examination at any point. The clinical interview should be conducted against DSM-5 criteria in a trauma-informed manner. You may also have a support person present during the exam.

4Occupational & Social Impairment Scoring

The examiner scores your condition under the §4.130 General Rating Formula, the same formula used for all mental health conditions. The rating is driven by how much the condition impairs your ability to work and maintain social relationships, not by the diagnosis label.

5Comorbid Conditions Assessment

The examiner should assess comorbid conditions frequently seen with MST: depression, anxiety, eating disorders, substance use, sexual dysfunction, and chronic pain. Each is separately claimable under §3.310, make sure they are documented even if not the primary reason for the exam.

See it before you sit in the room

03Preparation

Know your symptoms and secondary factors

What the report must actually say about mst & personal assault, §3.304(f)(5), §4.130, dc 9411/9434

  • Describe your symptoms at their worst, not how you manage on a good day, the rating reflects the full picture of impairment.
  • Tell the examiner about every behavioral change after the event, transfers, performance drops, substance use, relationship problems, these are the markers that corroborate the claim.
  • Identify every secondary condition: depression, anxiety, sleep problems, chronic pain, sexual dysfunction, each is separately ratable.
  • If the examiner does not mention markers or applies the combat-stressor standard instead of §3.304(f)(5), document it, that is an inadequate exam.

Pain level, frequency, lost work and functional loss, how to say them

Black female veteran in therapy office, looking reflective and composed in warm natural light

Hypervigilance & Avoidance

The examiner scores occupational and social impairment, avoidance of people, places, and situations that trigger trauma memories directly maps to the §4.130 criteria for reduced social functioning and inability to maintain relationships.

Describe how hypervigilance affects your daily life: scanning rooms for exits, inability to sit with your back to a door, avoiding crowds, difficulty being alone with certain people. These are not personality traits, they are measurable symptoms.

"I am unable to be in enclosed spaces with people I do not know. I scan every room for exits. I avoid situations that remind me of the assault, certain locations, certain types of people, certain times of day. It has cost me relationships and jobs."

White male veteran sitting on couch looking distant and thoughtful in warm home interior

Sleep Disturbance & Nightmares

Chronic sleep impairment is explicitly listed in the §4.130 criteria at the 30% level and above. Night terrors, insomnia, and fear of sleeping are common MST sequelae that compound occupational impairment through fatigue and concentration deficits.

Describe the sleep pattern: how many hours you actually sleep, how often nightmares wake you, whether you avoid sleeping or use substances to sleep. Sleep deprivation compounds every other symptom.

"I average two to three hours of broken sleep. Nightmares wake me most nights. I have slept with lights on for years. The fatigue affects my concentration at work and my ability to function during the day."

Hispanic female veteran writing in a personal journal at kitchen table, journal pages showing illegible handwriting

Intrusive Thoughts & Flashbacks

Intrusive re-experiencing symptoms, flashbacks, unwanted memories triggered by sensory cues, are hallmark PTSD criteria. Their frequency and intensity directly affect the impairment level the examiner records.

Be specific about triggers and frequency: what situations, smells, sounds, or interactions bring the memories back. Describe what happens physically during a flashback, dissociation, panic, inability to function in the moment.

"Certain smells, sounds, or physical proximity to strangers trigger flashbacks where I am back in the moment. I lose track of where I am. It happens multiple times a week and I have had to leave work because of it."

East Asian male veteran sitting peacefully on a park bench in quiet contemplation

Emotional Numbing & Trust Difficulty

Difficulty establishing and maintaining effective relationships is a key differentiator between the 50% and 70% criteria. Emotional detachment, inability to trust, and intimacy avoidance are core MST sequelae that map directly to this criterion.

Describe how the trauma has affected your closest relationships: marriage, parenting, friendships. The inability to trust or to be emotionally present is not a choice, it is a trauma response the examiner needs to document.

"I cannot maintain close relationships. I have lost marriages and friendships because I cannot let people in. Physical intimacy triggers panic. I feel emotionally detached from people I care about, and I know it but cannot change it."

Middle Eastern female veteran in supportive group therapy setting, sitting in circle of chairs

Depression & Suicidal Ideation

Near-continuous depression and suicidal ideation are criteria at the 70% level. Depression comorbid with MST-related PTSD is also separately claimable under §3.310, potentially adding a second rating for the same underlying trauma.

If you experience suicidal thoughts, describe their frequency and whether you have a plan or history of attempts. The examiner is required to document this. If you have sought emergency treatment, bring those records.

"I have experienced suicidal thoughts regularly since the assault. I have been hospitalized for it. Depression is constant, not situational, and it compounds the PTSD symptoms to the point where I cannot function on most days."

Secondary conditions to raise in the same appointment

Every secondary condition laid out in the Secondary Conditions section above belongs in this same appointment. Name each one out loud, tell the examiner how the primary condition caused it or made it worse, and ask that it be noted in the report. Under 38 CFR 3.310, a secondary condition the examiner never hears about is a secondary condition the VA never rates. Bring your list on paper so nothing gets left in the parking lot.

What to expect at this specific exam

  • Request a same-gender examiner in writing before the exam date.
  • Prepare your stressor statement connecting the in-service assault to the behavioral markers in your record.
  • Gather lay statements from family, friends, or clergy you told at or near the time.
  • Compile a timeline of behavioral markers: transfer requests, performance changes, leave increases, substance use onset.
  • Document every secondary condition and its relationship to the MST-related PTSD.
  • Arrange for a support person to accompany you if needed, you have that right.

04The Protocol

What procedures are required during the exam

These are not courtesies. Each comes out of the regulation or out of binding case law. Take this list in with you and tick them off as they happen.

Hispanic female therapist conducting clinical interview in professional office with blank clipboard
Fig. 01, Trauma-Informed Clinical Interview

01Trauma-Informed Clinical Interview

38 CFR §3.304(f)(5); DSM-5 PTSD Criteria

The clinical interview is conducted under the §3.304(f)(5) markers standard, not the ordinary combat-stressor standard. The examiner assesses PTSD and comorbid conditions against DSM-5 criteria in a trauma-informed manner. You can pause or stop at any time.

This is the core of the exam. The examiner must apply the correct evidentiary standard. If they treat it like a standard PTSD claim requiring verified combat stressors, the exam is inadequate.

East Asian female veteran reviewing documents with advocate in professional office
Fig. 02, Behavioral Markers Review

02Behavioral Markers Review

38 CFR §3.304(f)(5), Alternative Evidence Sources

The examiner reviews the service record for behavioral markers: transfer requests, performance evaluation changes, increased leave or sick call, substance use onset, disciplinary actions, pregnancy tests or STI screening, chaplain visits, and relationship deterioration.

Markers are the evidentiary foundation of the claim. The VA is required to consider them and to notify you that you may submit them. If the report ignores markers, it is deficient.

Close-up of hands holding pen over blank form on desk, representing stressor statement preparation
Fig. 03, Stressor Statement Preparation

03Stressor Statement Preparation

38 CFR §3.304(f)(5), Stressor Corroboration

Your written account connecting the in-service assault to the behavioral markers and to your current symptoms. This is the narrative backbone of the claim. It must be detailed, consistent with the record, and connect the markers to the event and the event to your current condition.

The stressor statement bridges the gap between the markers in the record and the clinical diagnosis. Without it, the examiner has no framework to connect the dots.

Black female veteran speaking with same-gender clinician in warm, safe clinical space
Fig. 04, Lay Evidence Collection

04Lay Evidence Collection

38 CFR §3.304(f)(5), Lay Evidence; 38 CFR §3.303(a)

Statements from family, friends, clergy, or fellow service members you told at or near the time of the event. These are competent evidence of the stressor even when no formal report was filed. The VA is required to consider them under §3.304(f)(5).

Contemporaneous disclosure is powerful evidence. A statement from someone you told at the time carries the weight of a report the system failed to create.

Middle Eastern male veteran sitting calmly in comfortable waiting area before appointment
Fig. 05, Occupational & Social Impairment Assessment

05Occupational & Social Impairment Assessment

38 CFR §4.130, General Rating Formula for Mental Disorders

The examiner scores occupational and social impairment under the §4.130 General Rating Formula, the same formula used for all mental health conditions. The rating is determined by the degree of impairment in work, relationships, judgment, thinking, and mood.

This scoring determines the percentage. The examiner must document the full extent of impairment, not just the clinical diagnosis but how it affects every area of your life.

05The Standard

What makes an exam adequate

Read your exam report against these. An exam that fails the standard is legally inadequate, and an inadequate exam is something you challenge rather than accept.

01

The range of motion has to be MEASURED, not estimated

38 CFR §4.46 states that the use of a goniometer in the measurement of limitation of motion is indispensable in examinations conducted within the Department of Veterans Affairs. An examiner who eyeballs your bend and writes a number has not complied with the regulation. This is the most common defect in a spine exam and it is the easiest one to spot from the chair.

02

Joints must be tested in every required condition

Under Correia v. McDonald, a joint examination for pain must, wherever possible, record active motion, passive motion, motion in weight-bearing and motion in non-weight-bearing, and where relevant, the range of the opposite undamaged joint. An exam that records one set of numbers and stops is incomplete on its face, and that incompleteness is grounds to challenge it.

03

Flare-ups have to be addressed, not dodged

Under Sharp v. Shulkin, when a veteran describes flare-ups, the examiner is obligated to estimate the additional loss of motion during a flare based on all the available evidence, including your own account of it. "I cannot opine without resorting to mere speculation" is not automatically acceptable; the examiner has to have actually sought the information first and explained why an estimate is impossible.

04

Repetitive use and functional loss must be factored in

Sections 4.40 and 4.45, and the DeLuca line of cases, require that pain, weakness, fatigability, incoordination and lack of endurance after repeated use be considered, and expressed in additional degrees of lost motion where that is feasible. Your rating is supposed to reflect what you can do on the fifth repetition and on a bad day, not just the first careful bend of the morning.

05

Neurological findings must be separately documented

Note (1) to the General Rating Formula requires that any associated objective neurologic abnormality be evaluated separately under an appropriate diagnostic code. If your leg symptoms were mentioned in the narrative but never tested and never assigned, the exam did not do what the schedule requires of it.

06

The examiner must review the record when the question requires it

Where a medical opinion on cause, aggravation or a secondary relationship was requested, the examiner is expected to review the relevant evidence and give a reasoned explanation. A bare conclusion, "less likely than not related to service" with no reasoning attached, carries little weight, and an opinion with no rationale is challengeable.

07

The examiner has to be qualified for the body system

The VA may use its own clinicians or a contract vendor. Either way, the examiner is expected to have the competence to evaluate the system being examined. If a spinal exam with a neurological component was performed by someone who never tested a reflex, that is a problem worth raising.

08

The exam has to be CURRENT

A rating is supposed to reflect your condition now. An exam performed before a documented worsening, or years before the decision, may not support the current evaluation, and you can request a new one on that basis.

06Afterward

What happens after your exam is complete

The examiner writes the report and submits it, it is reviewed for completeness, and only then does the claim move toward a rating decision. Here is what actually controls the clock.

Examiner at a desk completing and submitting the exam questionnaire
01

The examiner writes and submits the report

Days 1–5 after the exam

The examiner compiles the history, the physical findings, the measurements and any testing into the questionnaire, adds any requested medical opinion, and submits it. Contract vendors typically have a turnaround requirement measured in days, not weeks.

Nothing about your claim moves while this is happening, and nothing you do speeds it up. What matters is that the report is written from notes taken in the room, which is exactly why what you said, and how the examiner recorded it, is already locked in by the time you get to your car. Request your copy now rather than later.

Reviewer flagging an incomplete field and sending the exam report back to the examiner
02

Quality review, and the request for clarification

Days 3–30

The report is reviewed for completeness. If it is internally inconsistent, missing a required field or missing the opinion the VA asked for, it goes back for correction or a second opinion. This is the single most common cause of a claim appearing to stall after the exam.

Understand what a finished exam actually means: it means the appointment happened, not that your claim is ready for a decision. If the reviewer finds a blank range-of-motion field, an opinion that does not answer the question that was asked, or findings that contradict each other, the file goes back out for more information. That is a normal quality control step, not a rejection of your claim, and it is not a sign that you did something wrong, but it does add weeks, and it is the reason so much of what you read online sounds like the system is broken.

Claim status tracker on a screen showing the progress bar jumped backward from a late step to an early step
03

Your status tracker moves backward, and it is usually not bad news

Any time after the exam

The online tracker shows eight steps. Veterans watch it reach step 7 or 8, then find it back at step 3 or 4 a week later. That regression almost always means one thing: the file went back for additional information, most often a returned or clarified exam.

This is the number one thing veterans panic about, and it is misread constantly. The tracker is not a countdown, it is a location marker. When the VA decides it needs one more piece of evidence, a corrected exam, a clarifying medical opinion or an outstanding record, the claim is routed back to the evidence gathering step and the bar redraws itself where the file physically is. It does not mean a denial. It does not mean your case was thrown out or restarted. It does not erase anything already in the file, and it does not change your effective date. What it does mean is that something in the record was not good enough to decide on yet, which is worth knowing, because if the weak link is the exam, this is the window where a corrective statement or a private opinion from your own doctor does the most good.

Medical records folders being handed across a counter as the evidence gathering window closes
04

Evidence gathering closes

Varies

Before anyone rates your claim, the file has to be built. This is the stretch where the Regional Office pulls together everything the decision will rest on: your service treatment records, your VA medical records, any federal records, the C&P exam report, and any private records it has requested on your behalf. The claim sits here until the VA is satisfied the record is complete enough to decide, which is exactly why a status tracker can appear to stall or slide backward at this step. You are not powerless while it sits here. Anything you put into the file yourself lands the day you send it, and every relevant record you add now is one less thing the rater can later say was missing.

A VA request to a private provider is a letter that may or may not be answered, and the VA will wait on it for weeks before moving on, sometimes without ever getting a response. A record you walk in yourself, or upload through your claim, is in the file the day you send it. So do not sit and wait to be asked. If you know a treatment record, an imaging report, a surgical note or a buddy statement exists and it matters, send it now, with a VA Form 21-4138 statement that explains in plain words what the document is and what it shows. This is also the window where a corrective statement or a private medical opinion from your own doctor does the most good, before the rater has locked in a decision, not after. Once the evidence gathering step closes, the file goes to a rating specialist, and your chance to shape the record cheaply and quickly closes with it.

Rating specialist applying the rating schedule to a file and producing the decision letter
05

Rating decision and promulgation

Typically several weeks after the last piece of evidence lands

This is the stage where your evidence finally becomes a number. A rating specialist, not the examiner, and not a doctor, takes everything in the file and applies the rating schedule to it: the exam findings, your range-of-motion measurements, your lay statements, your private records and any medical opinions. They assign a diagnostic code to each condition, pull a percentage from the schedule, set your effective date, and either grant, deny or defer each issue. The decision is then reviewed and authorized, promulgation is simply the VA’s word for making it official, and the decision letter and code sheet are generated and mailed. Where an award is made, payment follows the effective date rules, and back pay is calculated to that date.

Read the code sheet, not just the percentage. It names the diagnostic code used, the exact measurements relied on and the effective date assigned, and that is where most mistakes live. This is a human being reading a file under a production quota, and the two things that go wrong most often are a rater using the pre-repetition range-of-motion numbers instead of the worst-case figures §4.59 and §4.40 require, and a claimed condition being decided on a thin record or quietly left out. Check whether painful motion was accounted for, whether your radiculopathy was rated separately under Note (1) or folded into the spine rating, and whether every condition you claimed was actually addressed. A decision you do not read is a decision you cannot challenge, and the deadline to challenge it starts the day the letter is dated, not the day you understand it.

Opened rating decision letter with a magnifying glass over the reasons for decision section
06

C&P examination is the decision letter

The day it lands in your mailbox

The envelope holds two different documents: the narrative decision letter, and the code sheet. Together they are the single most important piece of paper in your claim, because every deadline, every appeal option and every dollar of back pay is set by what is printed on them, not by what you were told at the exam.

Most veterans read one thing on that letter: the percentage. Then they either celebrate it or get angry at it, and file it in a drawer. That is the mistake. The percentage is the conclusion; the reasons section is the reasoning, and the reasoning is what you attack. It tells you which diagnostic code the rater used, which range-of-motion figures they relied on and which they ignored, whether painful motion under §4.59 was accounted for, whether your neurological findings were rated separately under Note (1) or folded into the spine rating, which conditions were decided, which were deferred, and which were never addressed at all. It also assigns your effective date, which controls back pay. A rating that looks low is very often not a disagreement about how bad your neck is, it is a rater who used the pre-repetition numbers, or missed the radiculopathy, or rated one side and not both. You cannot see any of that from the percentage. Do not go by the percentage alone, and do not decode it by yourself if you are not sure what you are looking at, have someone who reads these for a living read it with you before the clock runs out. You have one year from the date on that letter to file a Higher-Level Review (VA Form 20-0996), a Supplemental Claim (VA Form 20-0995) or a Board appeal, and the deadline runs from the date printed on the letter, not the date you opened it. Bring it to this office and we will go through it line by line, at no cost, and tell you plainly whether it is right.

What normal looks like: 30 to 60 days for a simple claim, longer for a complex one

After your exam you should expect some kind of notification from the VA, a decision, a request for more information, or a notice that another exam has been scheduled. For a straightforward, single-issue claim that often lands within 30 to 60 days. But 30 to 60 days is a rough guide, not a rule, and it is not a ceiling. A claim with several conditions, a toxic-exposure or presumptive question, a returned exam, or missing records routinely takes 90 days or more, and that alone does not mean anything is wrong, the more moving parts your case has, the longer the VA takes to work it. Inside the window that is normal for a case like yours, silence is expected and there is nothing to fix, and a tracker that jumps backward is normal too.

What matters is not a fixed number of days, it is whether the claim is still moving and whether you can get a straight answer about where it is. Once you are well past what is normal for a case like yours and the VA either goes silent or cannot tell you what the claim is waiting on, stop waiting. That is usually where the real trouble hides, an exam that came back twice, a records request that was never answered, a claimed condition that got dropped, or a file sitting in the wrong queue. Call the VA at 800-827-1000, ask specifically what the claim is waiting on and who it is assigned to, and write down the answer. If you cannot get a straight answer, or the answer tells you the exam is the problem, that is the moment to bring it to this office rather than sitting on it for another three months. Problems raised early get fixed inside the claim. Problems discovered in a denial letter get fixed on appeal, and that costs you a year.

Other things that control the clock

Six things decide how long you wait, and none of them are visible from the tracker alone.

VA claim status page on a monitor showing an average days to complete figure with a trend line that changes month to month
01

The average is a moving number

Check it at the source, not second-hand

The VA publishes an average days-to-complete figure for disability claims that moves month to month; check the current number on the VA’s own claim status page rather than relying on any second-hand figure. In practice, most veterans see a decision somewhere between roughly three and eight months from the date the claim was filed, with the exam usually falling in the middle of that window.

Process pipeline showing the exam marked complete at the start followed by evidence gathering, rating decision and authorization still ahead
02

The exam is not the last step

Three stages still sit in front of you

The exam is not the last step. The clock does not start at the exam and it does not stop there either, the claim still has to clear evidence gathering, the rating decision and authorization.

Exam report stamped returned for clarification beside a claim tracker whose progress bar is moving backward
03

A returned exam is the invisible delay

The reason a tracker slides backward

A returned or clarified exam is the most common invisible delay, and it is why a tracker can slide backward. Expect some contact from the VA within 30 to 60 days of the exam. Past 60 days with nothing at all, call and ask specifically what the claim is waiting on.

Calendar with days 30 through 60 shaded as the normal window and everything past day 60 shaded red beside the VA benefits phone number
04

30 to 60 days is a guide, not a deadline

A complex case can take 90 days or more

Thirty to sixty days is a rough average for a simple, single-issue claim, not a hard rule and not a ceiling. A claim with several conditions, a presumptive or toxic-exposure question, a returned exam, or missing records can easily take 90 days or more, and that alone does not mean anything is wrong. Watch whether the claim is still moving, not the calendar. Only when it stalls well past what is normal for a case like yours, and no one can tell you what it is waiting on, should you stop waiting, call 800-827-1000 and ask what the claim is waiting on and who it is assigned to.

Three ways to track a claim shown side by side: the VA.gov claim status page, the VA Health and Benefits mobile app, and the benefits telephone line
05

Watch your status yourself, in one of three places

Weekly, not daily

Check your own status in one of three places: your VA.gov claim status page, the VA Health and Benefits mobile app, or by calling 800-827-1000. Check it weekly, not daily. And understand exactly what a status check can tell you: if a decision is posted in your account, it is live; if it is not posted, it is not ready. That is the whole rule. This is not something your representative or your attorney can speed up, we see the same thing you see, at the same time, and calling us to ask does not move it. Calling the VA to ask for an update does not move it either. Watch it yourself, weekly, and the moment a decision posts, bring it to us.

Flat infographic of a VA rating decision letter held beside a calendar stamped ONE YEAR TO APPEAL, with the three appeal lanes, Higher-Level Review, Supplemental Claim and Board Appeal, labeled below
06

Your decision letter arrives, read it, then start the appeal clock

What to do the day it lands in your mailbox

The decision letter is the finish line of the claim and the starting line of the appeal, and the moment it arrives, a one-year clock starts running. Read it the same day. Find the combined rating, the percentage assigned to each condition, and the effective date, because the effective date controls how far back your back pay reaches. Then request a copy of your C&P exam report so you can see whether the rater used your real range-of-motion numbers or ignored the radiculopathy. If any part of the decision is wrong, a low rating, a denied condition, or a bad effective date, you have three appeal lanes, and you must choose one within one year of the date printed on the letter: a **Higher-Level Review (VA Form 20-0996)**, where a senior reviewer re-decides on the same evidence; a **Supplemental Claim (VA Form 20-0995)**, when you have new and relevant evidence such as a private DBQ or your own range-of-motion exam; or a **Board Appeal (VA Form 10182)** to a Veterans Law Judge. Miss that one-year deadline and the decision becomes final. You can still file again later, but you lose the original effective date, and that lost time is lost back pay you never get back. Bring the letter to this office before the year runs out and we will read it with you, line by line, at no cost.

07Remedy

How to report a bad exam

Where this exam goes wrong

The most common trap is the examiner applying the **wrong evidentiary standard**, treating this like an ordinary PTSD claim that requires a verified combat stressor. Under §3.304(f)(5), markers replace the stressor verification requirement. If the examiner's report does not mention markers or applies the combat standard, the exam is inadequate and you are entitled to a new one. The second trap is minimizing symptoms: describe your worst days, not how you cope on a good day.

Flat infographic of a hand writing exam notes on a notepad inside a car with a clock recording the time
01

Write it down the moment you get to your car

Date, start time, end time, the examiner’s name and credentials, the vendor, every test that was performed, and every test that was not. A contemporaneous note written the same day is evidence. A memory reconstructed four months later is not.

Flat infographic of a C&P exam report and a DBQ questionnaire being requested through VA.gov and by phone
02

Get the exam report and the questionnaire

Request a copy through VA.gov, through a written request to the Regional Office, or by calling 800-827-1000. You cannot challenge what you have not read. Compare it line by line against what actually happened in the room.

Flat infographic of a magnifying glass over a document with a defect circled in red and a regulation citation tag
03

Name the defect specifically, with the citation

Never write "the exam was unfair." Write "no goniometer was used, contrary to 38 CFR §4.46" or "flare-ups were reported and not addressed, contrary to Sharp v. Shulkin" or "repetitive use testing was not performed, contrary to 38 CFR §4.40 and DeLuca." A specific, citable defect is what forces action.

Flat infographic of VA Form 21-4138 Statement in Support of Claim being submitted with an upload arrow
04

Submit a statement asking for a new examination

VA Form 21-4138, Statement in Support of Claim, filed through VA.gov or mailed to the Evidence Intake Center. State the defect, cite the authority, and request a new or supplemental examination. Do this BEFORE the decision if the claim is still open, it is far easier than undoing a decision afterward.

Flat infographic of two separate tracks, one labeled Patient Advocate for conduct and one labeled Exam Adequacy
05

Report examiner conduct separately

If the problem is behavior rather than methodology, you were rushed out, dismissed, never touched, or treated with hostility, file a complaint with the VA facility’s Patient Advocate, or with the vendor directly for a contract exam, and copy the Regional Office. Conduct complaints and adequacy challenges are two different tracks and you can run both.

Flat infographic of a signpost forking between Higher-Level Review 20-0996 and Supplemental Claim 20-0995
06

If a decision has already issued, pick the right lane

A Higher-Level Review (VA Form 20-0996) argues the VA erred on the evidence it had, the right vehicle when the exam was inadequate on its face. A Supplemental Claim (VA Form 20-0995) is the vehicle when you are adding new and relevant evidence, such as your own private range-of-motion examination or a completed DBQ from your treating provider.

Flat infographic of a goniometer measuring a joint angle beside a completed DBQ showing range-of-motion degrees
07

Put your own measurements on the table

A private examination with full goniometric measurements, or a DBQ completed by your own provider, creates a conflict in the evidence that the VA has to resolve, and under 38 CFR §3.102 reasonable doubt is resolved in your favor.

End of clinical section

MST & Personal Assault, §3.304(f)(5), §4.130, DC 9411/9434

The Questions Veterans Actually Ask

MST & Personal Assault Claims, Frequently Asked Questions

Straight answers to the questions that decide mst & personal assault claims, the ratings, the separate evaluations, and the exam mistakes that cost veterans money. Read every answer with your own file open. If an answer depends on a record you do not have yet, that is the next thing to request, from your doctor, your unit or the VA itself.

No. 38 CFR §3.304(f)(5) was written precisely because most sexual assaults in the military go unreported. The regulation explicitly allows alternative evidence, called markers, to corroborate the stressor. A police report strengthens a claim, but it is not required. Transfer requests, performance drops, substance use onset, and contemporaneous disclosure to family or clergy all qualify.

Every condition in MST & Personal Assault

A veteran marking his appointment dates on a kitchen wall calendar
Your responsibility as a veteran

Your Part in This Is Not Optional

I will be straight with you. No advocate on earth can win a claim for a veteran who will not do his or her part. The VA decides on the record, and you are the only person who can build the medical side of that record. We do the legal and forensic work. You do yours. Here is what that means, every single time:

  • See a doctor and get every symptom written into your medical record. If it is not on paper, the VA treats it as if it never happened.
  • Keep a symptom journal. Dates, flare-ups, missed work, the nights you did not sleep. That is the evidence of how this condition actually runs your life.
  • Answer every VA letter and every request for evidence before the deadline. Silence gets claims denied.
  • Show up to your C&P exam and describe your worst days honestly. Do not tough it out in that room. Do not exaggerate either.

You do your job and we will do ours. That is how claims get won.

Choose Your Service

The Three Services

We offer three completely separate services, kept distinct on purpose so you know exactly what you are buying, what it costs, and how it is paid. These are not tiers of one agreement, you choose the single option that fits your situation.

Two are contingency representation with no cost up front; they differ by how hard the case is and how the fee gets paid. The third is a flat-fee forensic report for the veteran who wants to fight the claim himself.

An accredited claims agent and a veteran reviewing a clean, single-issue appeal together
Option 1

Standard Direct-Pay Representation

20% of back pay

No cost up front, nothing out of pocket. The VA withholds our fee and pays us directly under §14.636(h). Best for cleaner, more recent, single-issue denials, routine higher-level reviews, supplemental claims, and rating increases, carried all the way to the Board of Veterans’ Appeals.

See full details
An advocate reviewing a veteran's decade-deep claims file
Option 2

High-Complexity Representation

30% of back pay

For high-complexity cases, long claim histories, prior Board denials, CUE, complex effective-date and TDIU fights, multi-issue toxic exposure. Still no cost up front. Because the VA pays a rep only up to 20% directly, the VA sends your full retro to you and we invoice you directly for the 30%. Lawful, but never entered into lightly.

See full details
A forensic file audit in progress
Option 3

Mission 5 Intelligence Brief

$750 flat

A standalone forensic file review and written road map, not representation. For the veteran with a tough, older case who wants to fight it himself and keep 100% of his back pay. We audit your file, show you every error, and hand you the plan. Available only to veterans who already have a VA decision.

See full details

The exact contingency percentage on your case is set in a written agreement by the complexity of the work, always within the maximum the law allows. Federal-court litigation, if it is ever needed, is a separate, pre-agreed arrangement.

Denied or under-rated?

Talk to a VA-accredited claims agent about your claim

Albert L. Thombs Jr. is a US Army veteran, VA-Accredited Claims Agent #45147, and 100% service-connected himself. He personally reviews every request. Fees are capped by 38 CFR §14.636, and there are no fees on representation unless you win.

702-992-4883

Mon–Fri, 11AM–6PM Pacific

Questions are always free. The Mission 5 Brief is $750 flat.