
Intercostal Neuralgia — Chest-Wall Nerve Pain Secondary to the Thoracic Spine
A band of burning, stabbing pain that wraps around one side of the rib cage, driven by an irritated thoracic nerve root. It gets worse with a deep breath, a cough, or a twist — and it is routinely mistaken for a heart or lung problem.
A thoracic nerve root exits the spine and becomes an intercostal nerve — it runs in the groove under each rib and wraps around the chest wall to the front. When a thoracic disc, arthritic facet, healed vertebral fracture or the scar from thoracic surgery irritates that root, the pain does not stay in your back. It travels the nerve and shows up as a band of burning, electric or stabbing pain that wraps around one side of the rib cage, from the spine to the breastbone. Deep breaths, coughing, sneezing and twisting light it up.
The danger with this condition is not the pain — it is the misdiagnosis. Band-like chest pain sends everyone to the cardiac and pulmonary workup first: EKG, troponins, chest CT. When those come back clean, the file too often ends at *"non-cardiac chest pain, etiology undetermined."* Undetermined etiology is not a nexus, and a claim built on it dies. What converts it is a provider who maps the pain to a specific thoracic dermatome (a T-level band) and ties it back to the service-connected thoracic spine.
Once the origin is thoracic, 38 C.F.R. §3.310(a) makes it a secondary condition to your rated back. Intercostal neuralgia is evaluated as neuritis under DC 8620 or neuralgia under DC 8720, applying the criteria of §4.123 and §4.124 for peripheral-nerve involvement. Because the intercostal nerves are among the "minor" peripheral nerves, describe the real functional cost — the shallow guarded breathing, the sleep you lose because you cannot lie on that side, the way a cough doubles you over — not just "it hurts."
The Diagnostic Codes
Conditions Rated In Thoracic Secondary Conditions
These are the codes the VA will actually stamp on a decision in this group. The code you are granted under decides which formula is used — and that decides your percentage. Intercostal Neuralgia is highlighted below.
DC 8620 / 8720

Intercostal Neuralgia — Chest-Wall Nerve Pain Secondary to the Thoracic Spine
A band of burning, stabbing pain that wraps around one side of the rib cage, driven by an irritated thoracic nerve root. It gets worse with a deep breath, a cough, or a twist — and it is routinely mistaken for a heart or lung problem.
You are reading this page
§4.124a · §3.310

Thoracic Myelopathy — Spinal Cord Compression Secondary to the Mid Back
Compression of the spinal cord at the mid-back level. Unlike a neck cord problem that hits the hands, thoracic cord compression spares the arms and strikes the legs — spasticity, an unsteady gait, and in severe cases bowel or bladder loss. Always a surgical emergency.
Read the full page
Before Anything Gets Rated
What The VA Is Actually Looking For — And What Service Connection Really Means
Before the VA ever opens the rating schedule, it asks one question: is this disability the government’s responsibility? That is what “service connection” means. It is not a diagnosis, it is not sympathy, and it is not a reward for having served. It is a legal finding that a current, diagnosed disability is linked to something that happened to you in uniform. Percentages come later. If service connection is not established, there is nothing to rate and the claim is denied — no matter how bad the intercostal neuralgia is.

The three elements the VA must find. All three. Every time.
These come out of Caluza v. Brown and Shedden v. Principi, and they are the checklist a rating officer works through on your file. Miss one and the claim fails on that element alone.
A current, diagnosed disability
A doctor has to have written a diagnosis in a medical record — intercostal neuralgia. Symptoms by themselves are not a disability the VA can rate. Saunders v. Wilkie held that pain causing functional impairment can be a disability, but you still need a clinician to document it as diagnosed and impairing. The diagnosis must exist now, during the claim period — not only years ago.
An in-service event, injury, illness or aggravation
Something in service had to have happened — an injury, an exposure, a documented sick call, or steady wear over a career. It does not have to be one dramatic moment and it does not have to be spelled out in your service treatment records: buddy statements, unit records, performance evaluations and your own competent lay testimony can establish it.
A medical nexus linking the two
A qualified medical opinion that says the current diagnosis is at least as likely as not related to the in-service event. That phrase matters: at least as likely as not means 50 percent or better. Under 38 C.F.R. §3.102, when the evidence is evenly balanced, the benefit of the doubt goes to you and the claim must be granted.
The five ways service connection is established
Most veterans only know the first one. The other routes are lower-effort paths to the same grant — and the secondary route is the one most often left on the table.
Direct — 38 C.F.R. §3.303(a)
The injury or disease began in service and never went away. The classic route: three elements, one nexus opinion.
Chronicity and continuity — §3.303(b)
A chronic condition shown in service, plus continuity of the same symptoms from separation to now, can establish the link without a formal nexus opinion. Your own testimony about symptoms you can observe is competent evidence.
Presumptive — §3.307 and §3.309
Certain chronic diseases are presumed service connected if they manifest to a compensable degree within a set window after separation. You do not have to prove causation at all.
Secondary — §3.310(a) and (b)
A disability proximately due to, or aggravated by, an already service-connected condition is itself service connected. This is how the downstream conditions intercostal neuralgia sets off get on the rating sheet.
Aggravation of a pre-service condition — §3.306
If you entered service with a condition and service made it permanently worse, the increase is compensable. The VA must rebut the presumption of soundness by clear and unmistakable evidence — a bar it frequently fails to meet.
VA medical care — 38 U.S.C. §1151
An additional disability caused by VA treatment, surgery, or a failure to diagnose is compensated as if it were service connected.
The bottom line — there is no way around this
No diagnosis, no rating. It has to be chronic. It has to cause impairment.
Without a diagnosis, the VA will not rate your claim.
The rating schedule is a list of diagnosed conditions and the codes attached to them. If no clinician has put a name on your condition in a medical record, there is no code to assign. Symptoms reported to a claims examiner are not a diagnosis. Get in front of a doctor and get it written down.
The condition must be chronic.
Chronic means persistent and ongoing — not something that resolved decades ago. The VA compensates a disability you carry today, which is why a documented, continuing treatment history matters more than the single worst day you ever had.
It must cause actual impairment.
Under 38 C.F.R. §4.1 and §4.10, VA compensation exists to pay for reduction in earning capacity. A diagnosis that costs you nothing gets a zero percent rating. The function you have lost is what converts a diagnosis into a percentage.
What this means for you before you file: get the diagnosis in writing, get the treatment history documented so the chronicity is undeniable, and describe the impairment in functional terms — what you can no longer do, and what it costs you at work and at home. Everything on the rest of this page is built on top of those three things.
The Percentages
The Intercostal Nerve Rating Schedule — 38 CFR §4.124a
The intercostal nerves are rated by analogy. Neuritis (8620) and neuralgia (8720) are graded by the severity of the nerve involvement. Because these are minor nerves, the schedule caps the analogous evaluation, so the value is in getting each affected level recognized and correctly characterized rather than under-rated as "mild."

Neuritis
DC 8620 — neuritis of the intercostal nerve is rated on the severity of the sensory and any motor involvement, graded moderate or severe by analogy to the nerve criteria in §4.123.
Neuralgia
DC 8720 — neuralgia of the intercostal nerve, characterized usually by a dull and intermittent pain of the typical distribution, is rated under §4.124 at the level of the affected nerve.
Note
If more than one intercostal level is involved, each level is characterized separately, and combined under §4.25 where the evidence supports distinct affected nerves.
Service Connection
Advice from the Advocate

The advocate's notes on causation — Intercostal Neuralgia
The separate arguments that decide this code: where the VA will attack, the regulation that answers it, and the evidence that closes the gap.

1Secondary to the thoracic spine — §3.310(a)
The nexus is anatomical and mechanical: the irritated thoracic nerve root becomes the painful intercostal nerve. A provider must state that the chest-wall pain follows a thoracic dermatome and originates at the service-connected thoracic level, not the heart or lungs.
2Map the pain to a T-level
Do not let the record say "chest pain." Get the pain mapped to a specific thoracic dermatome — a T4, T6 or T8 band — because a named dermatome is what proves the generator is the spine and turns "undetermined" into a ratable, service-connected nerve.
3Rule the heart and lungs out on paper
A clean EKG, troponins and chest imaging are your allies here — they are the documentation that forces the diagnosis toward the nerve. Make sure those negative cardiac and pulmonary findings are in the file next to the positive dermatomal exam.
Exposure & Aggravation
How Intercostal Neuralgia Happens In Service — And How It Gets Worse
How veterans pick this up in uniform — Intercostal Neuralgia
Intercostal Neuralgia rarely announces itself with one dramatic moment. It is built by what service asked of your body over months and years — and once it is service-connected, it is compensated for how it keeps getting worse, not for how it started. Below is how veterans pick this up in uniform, and who is most prone to it.
- Thoracic disc herniation or facet arthritis from years of load-bearing under armor and rucks
- Healed thoracic vertebral compression fracture that now irritates an adjacent root
- Scar entrapment of an intercostal nerve after thoracic or thoracotomy surgery
Who is most prone to it
Veterans with a rated thoracic strain, degenerative disc disease, or a healed thoracic compression fracture who report chest-wall or rib pain that the cardiac and pulmonary workups keep coming back clean on.
The Symptoms
What Intercostal Neuralgia Actually Feels Like
- A band of burning, stabbing or electric pain wrapping around one side of the rib cage
- Pain that spikes with a deep breath, a cough, a sneeze or a laugh
- Sharp pain when twisting or bending the trunk
- Tenderness along a specific rib or the space between two ribs
- Numbness, tingling or a crawling sensation following the same band
- Shallow, guarded breathing to avoid triggering the pain
- Chest-wall pain that a full cardiac and pulmonary workup has ruled clean
How this one is rated
Rated as a peripheral-nerve condition under 38 C.F.R. §4.124a, DC 8620 (neuritis) or DC 8720 (neuralgia), applying §4.123 and §4.124. The evaluation turns on how severe and how widespread the sensory disturbance is along the intercostal nerve, and whether there is any associated muscle or motor involvement of the chest wall.
What you are measured against
The severity of the sensory disturbance along the affected intercostal nerve — mild, moderate or severe — and any motor or trophic changes in the chest-wall musculature.
Each One On Its Own Page
Secondary Conditions — Aggravated or Caused by a Current Service-Connected Condition
Under 38 CFR §3.310(a), a disability that is proximately due to a service-connected condition is service-connected in its own right — and under §3.310(b), so is any additional disability caused when a service-connected condition aggravates a problem you already had. Each condition below is a separate evaluation with its own diagnostic code and its own percentage. They do not fold into the intercostal neuralgia rating — they stack on top of it. A veteran who claims only the primary condition leaves these ratings on the table.

The sleep you lose lying on that side
You cannot lie on the painful side, and every roll in the night triggers the band — so the sleep goes. Chronic sleep loss is its own documentable consequence of the nerve pain, and it compounds fatigue, mood and concentration. Report the broken nights; they show the real functional cost the schedule wants beyond "it hurts."

Shallow, guarded breathing
To dodge the stab, you breathe shallow and guard the chest wall — you stop taking full breaths. That guarded breathing is a visible functional loss the examiner should record, and over time it limits exertion and endurance. It is direct evidence of how the intercostal nerve disables day-to-day activity.

Lifting, carrying and unemployability
Lifting a box, carrying a load or reaching overhead pulls the chest wall and fires the band — which ends work in the trades and in any job that requires it. When the pain keeps you from substantially gainful work, that is the raw material of a TDIU claim under §4.16. Document every task you can no longer do.
Accredited Claims Agent #45147
Ready To Get This Rated Correctly?
Contingency fee — zero upfront, paid only from back pay when you win. If your rating does not increase, you owe nothing.
Thoracic Secondary Conditions, In Detail
Thoracic Secondary Conditions — Service Connection In Depth
Here is each claimable condition in this group on its own terms — what it is, what service did to it, and what the VA requires before it will connect it.

Intercostal Neuralgia — Chest-Wall Nerve Pain Secondary to the Thoracic Spine
A thoracic nerve root exits the spine and becomes an intercostal nerve — it runs in the groove under each rib and wraps around the chest wall to the front. When a thoracic disc, arthritic facet, healed vertebral fracture or the scar from thoracic surgery irritates that root, the pain does not stay in your back. It travels the nerve and shows up as a band of burning, electric or stabbing pain that wraps around one side of the rib cage, from the spine to the breastbone. Deep breaths, coughing, sneezing and twisting light it up.
You are reading this page now

Thoracic Myelopathy — Spinal Cord Compression Secondary to the Mid Back
Intercostal neuralgia is irritation of a thoracic nerve root — it wraps around the chest. Thoracic myelopathy is compression of the spinal cord itself at the mid-back, and it affects everything below the level of the pinch. This is the critical distinction from a cervical cord problem: neck myelopathy hits the hands and all four limbs, while thoracic myelopathy spares the arms entirely and strikes the legs and trunk. A large thoracic disc herniation, severe stenosis, ossification of the ligament, or a fractured thoracic vertebra can crush the cord. The result is a band-like tightness around the trunk plus spasticity, a heavy stiff-legged gait, and in severe cases loss of bowel or bladder control.
Read the full Thoracic Myelopathy pageThe C&P Exam
What To Expect At The Intercostal Neuralgia Exam
This is the encounter your rating is built on. The examiner has a checklist and a limited window — what follows is exactly what happens in that room, so none of it surprises you.
Clinical Section — What To Expect at the Exam
The Intercostal Neuralgia Examination
The examiner must map the sensory band to a thoracic dermatome and document that the pain reproduces along the rib, not from the heart.
This exam is won on the sensory map and the reproduction of pain along the intercostal space.
Condition
Intercostal Neuralgia — DC 8620 / 8720
Governing questionnaire
VA Form 21-0960C-8, Peripheral Nerves DBQ, supported by a medical opinion tying the nerve to the thoracic spine
Click the form number to open the official questionnaire on VA.gov.
01In The Room
What happens during the exam
The tests and maneuvers for this condition
- Dermatomal sensory testing
- Intercostal space palpation
- Deep-breath / cough provocation
- Review of cardiac & pulmonary workup
What gets measured, and to what number
Sensory level
The specific thoracic dermatome (T-level) with altered light touch or pinprick.
Trigger
Whether deep breathing, coughing or twisting reproduces the pain.
Chest-wall tenderness
Point tenderness along the rib or intercostal space.
02Orientation
What to expect during this exam
What makes this exam different from every other C&P exam
1Dermatomal sensory mapping
The examiner runs light touch and pinprick along the rib bands and records which thoracic dermatome is altered. A named T-level band is the finding that proves the nerve, not the heart, is the source.
2Reproduction along the rib
Palpation of the intercostal space and the costovertebral junction should reproduce the burning band. Pain that reproduces on the chest wall — not with exertion — separates a nerve from a cardiac cause.
3Breathing provocation
A deep breath or a cough should spike the pain. That mechanical trigger is characteristic of intercostal nerve involvement and belongs in the report.
See it before you sit in the room

03Preparation
Know your symptoms and secondary factors
What the report must actually say about intercostal neuralgia — dc 8620 / 8720
- "It wraps around my ribs like a band."
- "A deep breath or a cough makes it stab."
- "My heart and lungs were checked and came back clear."
Pain level, frequency, lost work and functional loss — how to say them

Say it wraps around like a band — on one side
The word that names this condition is band. Pain that wraps from the spine around one side of the rib cage to the front, following the line of a single rib, is the signature of an intercostal nerve. Say "it hurts in my chest" and the examiner thinks heart; say "it wraps around my ribs in a band" and he thinks nerve.
Trace the band with your finger at the exam — from the back, around the side, to the breastbone — so the examiner can map it to a thoracic level.
"It is a band of pain that wraps around one side of my ribs, from my spine around to the front."

Tie every spike to a breath, a cough or a twist
Intercostal pain is mechanical — a deep breath, a cough, a sneeze or twisting the trunk makes it stab. That trigger is what separates it from cardiac pain, which fires with exertion, not with breathing. If you do not connect the spike to the movement, the record loses the finding that points at the nerve.
Name the exact triggers — the cough that doubles you over, the deep breath you cannot finish — not just "it hurts sometimes."
"A deep breath or a cough makes it stab — twisting to reach the seatbelt sets it off."

Name the quality: burning, electric, stabbing
Nerve pain has a quality the schedule recognizes — burning, electric, shooting, stabbing. "Sore" or "achy" reads as muscle and undersells you. The words burning and electric tell the examiner this is a peripheral nerve under DC 8620/8720, not a strained chest-wall muscle.
Use the nerve words every time, and add the numbness or crawling-skin feeling if you have it along the same band.
"It burns and shoots like an electric shock along the rib — sometimes the skin over it goes numb or crawls."

Say your heart and lungs came back clear
The clean cardiac and pulmonary workup is not a dead end — it is your evidence. A normal EKG, normal troponins and clear chest imaging force the diagnosis toward the nerve. State plainly that the heart and lungs were checked and cleared, so the examiner cannot park you at "non-cardiac chest pain, etiology undetermined."
Bring the actual reports and hand them over — do not rely on the examiner to pull them.
"My heart and lungs were fully worked up and came back clear — so this pain is coming from the nerve, not my chest."
Secondary conditions to raise in the same appointment

The sleep you lose lying on that side
You cannot lie on the painful side, and every roll in the night triggers the band — so the sleep goes. Chronic sleep loss is its own documentable consequence of the nerve pain, and it compounds fatigue, mood and concentration. Report the broken nights; they show the real functional cost the schedule wants beyond "it hurts."

Shallow, guarded breathing
To dodge the stab, you breathe shallow and guard the chest wall — you stop taking full breaths. That guarded breathing is a visible functional loss the examiner should record, and over time it limits exertion and endurance. It is direct evidence of how the intercostal nerve disables day-to-day activity.

Lifting, carrying and unemployability
Lifting a box, carrying a load or reaching overhead pulls the chest wall and fires the band — which ends work in the trades and in any job that requires it. When the pain keeps you from substantially gainful work, that is the raw material of a TDIU claim under §4.16. Document every task you can no longer do.
How to prepare for this specific exam
- Bring the clean EKG and chest imaging reports
- Bring the thoracic MRI or X-ray showing the level
- Be ready to point to the exact rib band
04The Protocol
What procedures are required during the exam
These are not courtesies. Each comes out of the regulation or out of binding case law. Take this list in with you and tick them off as they happen.

01Dermatomal sensory mapping
38 C.F.R. §4.124a, DC 8620 / 8720
The examiner runs light touch and pinprick along each rib band and records which thoracic dermatome — a T4, T6 or T8 level — is altered. A named T-level band is the single finding that proves the nerve, not the heart, is the source.
This is the positive finding that turns "chest pain, etiology undetermined" into a mapped, ratable intercostal nerve. Without a named dermatome the claim has no anatomical hook to the thoracic spine.

02Intercostal-space and costovertebral palpation
38 C.F.R. §4.124
The examiner presses along the intercostal space and the costovertebral junction and should reproduce the burning band. Pain that reproduces on the chest wall — not with exertion — is what separates a nerve from a cardiac cause.
Reproducible point tenderness along the rib is objective proof the generator is the chest-wall nerve. It corroborates your report and defeats a "subjective complaints only" denial.

03Deep-breath and cough provocation
38 C.F.R. §4.123
A deep breath or a forced cough should spike the pain along the band. That mechanical trigger is characteristic of intercostal nerve involvement and belongs in the report in the examiner's own words.
The breathing trigger is the clinical fingerprint that distinguishes intercostal neuralgia from cardiac and muscular pain. Recording it locks in the neuritic character the rating criteria reward.

04Documented cardiac and pulmonary rule-out
38 C.F.R. §3.310(a)
A normal EKG, normal troponins and clear chest imaging must be in the file next to the positive dermatomal exam. Those negative findings are not filler — they are what forces the diagnosis onto the nerve.
The clean cardiac and pulmonary workup is the documentary proof that the pain is neurogenic. Paired with the mapped dermatome it establishes the §3.310(a) link to the service-connected thoracic spine.

05Thoracic imaging tied to the level
38 C.F.R. §4.124a
A thoracic MRI or X-ray should show the disc, facet arthritis or healed fracture at the level that matches the painful dermatome. The imaging connects the mapped band back to a specific service-connected thoracic segment.
Imaging that names the same level as the sensory map completes the anatomical chain — spine to root to intercostal nerve — and is hard evidence a rater cannot wave off.

06Diagnostic intercostal nerve block
38 C.F.R. §4.124a, DC 8620
A targeted anesthetic block of the suspected intercostal nerve that relieves the band confirms which nerve is the generator. Relief after the injection is a diagnostic result, not just treatment.
A positive block is close to definitive proof of intercostal neuralgia at that level — it both confirms the diagnosis and pins the specific nerve the rating should address.
05The Standard
What makes an exam adequate
Read your exam report against these. An exam that fails the standard is legally inadequate, and an inadequate exam is something you challenge rather than accept.
The range of motion has to be MEASURED, not estimated
38 CFR §4.46 states that the use of a goniometer in the measurement of limitation of motion is indispensable in examinations conducted within the Department of Veterans Affairs. An examiner who eyeballs your bend and writes a number has not complied with the regulation. This is the most common defect in a spine exam and it is the easiest one to spot from the chair.
Joints must be tested in every required condition
Under Correia v. McDonald, a joint examination for pain must, wherever possible, record active motion, passive motion, motion in weight-bearing and motion in non-weight-bearing — and where relevant, the range of the opposite undamaged joint. An exam that records one set of numbers and stops is incomplete on its face, and that incompleteness is grounds to challenge it.
Flare-ups have to be addressed, not dodged
Under Sharp v. Shulkin, when a veteran describes flare-ups, the examiner is obligated to estimate the additional loss of motion during a flare based on all the available evidence — including your own account of it. "I cannot opine without resorting to mere speculation" is not automatically acceptable; the examiner has to have actually sought the information first and explained why an estimate is impossible.
Repetitive use and functional loss must be factored in
Sections 4.40 and 4.45, and the DeLuca line of cases, require that pain, weakness, fatigability, incoordination and lack of endurance after repeated use be considered — and expressed in additional degrees of lost motion where that is feasible. Your rating is supposed to reflect what you can do on the fifth repetition and on a bad day, not just the first careful bend of the morning.
Neurological findings must be separately documented
Note (1) to the General Rating Formula requires that any associated objective neurologic abnormality be evaluated separately under an appropriate diagnostic code. If your leg symptoms were mentioned in the narrative but never tested and never assigned, the exam did not do what the schedule requires of it.
The examiner must review the record when the question requires it
Where a medical opinion on cause, aggravation or a secondary relationship was requested, the examiner is expected to review the relevant evidence and give a reasoned explanation. A bare conclusion — "less likely than not related to service" with no reasoning attached — carries little weight, and an opinion with no rationale is challengeable.
The examiner has to be qualified for the body system
The VA may use its own clinicians or a contract vendor. Either way, the examiner is expected to have the competence to evaluate the system being examined. If a spinal exam with a neurological component was performed by someone who never tested a reflex, that is a problem worth raising.
The exam has to be CURRENT
A rating is supposed to reflect your condition now. An exam performed before a documented worsening, or years before the decision, may not support the current evaluation — and you can request a new one on that basis.
06Afterward
What happens after your exam is complete
The examiner writes the report and submits it, it is reviewed for completeness, and only then does the claim move toward a rating decision. Here is what actually controls the clock.

The examiner writes and submits the report
Days 1–5 after the exam
The examiner compiles the history, the physical findings, the measurements and any testing into the questionnaire, adds any requested medical opinion, and submits it. Contract vendors typically have a turnaround requirement measured in days, not weeks.
Nothing about your claim moves while this is happening, and nothing you do speeds it up. What matters is that the report is written from notes taken in the room — which is exactly why what you said, and how the examiner recorded it, is already locked in by the time you get to your car. Request your copy now rather than later.

Quality review — and the request for clarification
Days 3–30
The report is reviewed for completeness. If it is internally inconsistent, missing a required field or missing the opinion the VA asked for, it goes back for correction or a second opinion. This is the single most common cause of a claim appearing to stall after the exam.
Understand what a finished exam actually means: it means the appointment happened, not that your claim is ready for a decision. If the reviewer finds a blank range-of-motion field, an opinion that does not answer the question that was asked, or findings that contradict each other, the file goes back out for more information. That is a normal quality control step, not a rejection of your claim, and it is not a sign that you did something wrong — but it does add weeks, and it is the reason so much of what you read online sounds like the system is broken.

Your status tracker moves backward — and it is usually not bad news
Any time after the exam
The online tracker shows eight steps. Veterans watch it reach step 7 or 8, then find it back at step 3 or 4 a week later. That regression almost always means one thing: the file went back for additional information, most often a returned or clarified exam.
This is the number one thing veterans panic about, and it is misread constantly. The tracker is not a countdown — it is a location marker. When the VA decides it needs one more piece of evidence, a corrected exam, a clarifying medical opinion or an outstanding record, the claim is routed back to the evidence gathering step and the bar redraws itself where the file physically is. It does not mean a denial. It does not mean your case was thrown out or restarted. It does not erase anything already in the file, and it does not change your effective date. What it does mean is that something in the record was not good enough to decide on yet — which is worth knowing, because if the weak link is the exam, this is the window where a corrective statement or a private opinion from your own doctor does the most good.

Evidence gathering closes
Varies
Before anyone rates your claim, the file has to be built. This is the stretch where the Regional Office pulls together everything the decision will rest on: your service treatment records, your VA medical records, any federal records, the C&P exam report, and any private records it has requested on your behalf. The claim sits here until the VA is satisfied the record is complete enough to decide — which is exactly why a status tracker can appear to stall or slide backward at this step. You are not powerless while it sits here. Anything you put into the file yourself lands the day you send it, and every relevant record you add now is one less thing the rater can later say was missing.
A VA request to a private provider is a letter that may or may not be answered, and the VA will wait on it for weeks before moving on — sometimes without ever getting a response. A record you walk in yourself, or upload through your claim, is in the file the day you send it. So do not sit and wait to be asked. If you know a treatment record, an imaging report, a surgical note or a buddy statement exists and it matters, send it now, with a VA Form 21-4138 statement that explains in plain words what the document is and what it shows. This is also the window where a corrective statement or a private medical opinion from your own doctor does the most good — before the rater has locked in a decision, not after. Once the evidence gathering step closes, the file goes to a rating specialist, and your chance to shape the record cheaply and quickly closes with it.

Rating decision and promulgation
Typically several weeks after the last piece of evidence lands
This is the stage where your evidence finally becomes a number. A rating specialist — not the examiner, and not a doctor — takes everything in the file and applies the rating schedule to it: the exam findings, your range-of-motion measurements, your lay statements, your private records and any medical opinions. They assign a diagnostic code to each condition, pull a percentage from the schedule, set your effective date, and either grant, deny or defer each issue. The decision is then reviewed and authorized — promulgation is simply the VA’s word for making it official — and the decision letter and code sheet are generated and mailed. Where an award is made, payment follows the effective date rules, and back pay is calculated to that date.
Read the code sheet, not just the percentage. It names the diagnostic code used, the exact measurements relied on and the effective date assigned — and that is where most mistakes live. This is a human being reading a file under a production quota, and the two things that go wrong most often are a rater using the pre-repetition range-of-motion numbers instead of the worst-case figures §4.59 and §4.40 require, and a claimed condition being decided on a thin record or quietly left out. Check whether painful motion was accounted for, whether your radiculopathy was rated separately under Note (1) or folded into the spine rating, and whether every condition you claimed was actually addressed. A decision you do not read is a decision you cannot challenge — and the deadline to challenge it starts the day the letter is dated, not the day you understand it.

C&P examination is the decision letter
The day it lands in your mailbox
The envelope holds two different documents: the narrative decision letter, and the code sheet. Together they are the single most important piece of paper in your claim, because every deadline, every appeal option and every dollar of back pay is set by what is printed on them — not by what you were told at the exam.
Most veterans read one thing on that letter: the percentage. Then they either celebrate it or get angry at it, and file it in a drawer. That is the mistake. The percentage is the conclusion; the reasons section is the reasoning, and the reasoning is what you attack. It tells you which diagnostic code the rater used, which range-of-motion figures they relied on and which they ignored, whether painful motion under §4.59 was accounted for, whether your neurological findings were rated separately under Note (1) or folded into the spine rating, which conditions were decided, which were deferred, and which were never addressed at all. It also assigns your effective date, which controls back pay. A rating that looks low is very often not a disagreement about how bad your neck is — it is a rater who used the pre-repetition numbers, or missed the radiculopathy, or rated one side and not both. You cannot see any of that from the percentage. Do not go by the percentage alone, and do not decode it by yourself if you are not sure what you are looking at — have someone who reads these for a living read it with you before the clock runs out. You have one year from the date on that letter to file a Higher-Level Review (VA Form 20-0996), a Supplemental Claim (VA Form 20-0995) or a Board appeal, and the deadline runs from the date printed on the letter, not the date you opened it. Bring it to this office and we will go through it line by line, at no cost, and tell you plainly whether it is right.
What normal looks like: 30 to 60 days for a simple claim, longer for a complex one
After your exam you should expect some kind of notification from the VA — a decision, a request for more information, or a notice that another exam has been scheduled. For a straightforward, single-issue claim that often lands within 30 to 60 days. But 30 to 60 days is a rough guide, not a rule, and it is not a ceiling. A claim with several conditions, a toxic-exposure or presumptive question, a returned exam, or missing records routinely takes 90 days or more, and that alone does not mean anything is wrong — the more moving parts your case has, the longer the VA takes to work it. Inside the window that is normal for a case like yours, silence is expected and there is nothing to fix, and a tracker that jumps backward is normal too.
What matters is not a fixed number of days — it is whether the claim is still moving and whether you can get a straight answer about where it is. Once you are well past what is normal for a case like yours and the VA either goes silent or cannot tell you what the claim is waiting on, stop waiting. That is usually where the real trouble hides — an exam that came back twice, a records request that was never answered, a claimed condition that got dropped, or a file sitting in the wrong queue. Call the VA at 800-827-1000, ask specifically what the claim is waiting on and who it is assigned to, and write down the answer. If you cannot get a straight answer, or the answer tells you the exam is the problem, that is the moment to bring it to this office rather than sitting on it for another three months. Problems raised early get fixed inside the claim. Problems discovered in a denial letter get fixed on appeal, and that costs you a year.
Other things that control the clock
Six things decide how long you wait, and none of them are visible from the tracker alone.

The average is a moving number
Check it at the source, not second-hand
The VA publishes an average days-to-complete figure for disability claims that moves month to month; check the current number on the VA’s own claim status page rather than relying on any second-hand figure. In practice, most veterans see a decision somewhere between roughly three and eight months from the date the claim was filed, with the exam usually falling in the middle of that window.

The exam is not the last step
Three stages still sit in front of you
The exam is not the last step. The clock does not start at the exam and it does not stop there either — the claim still has to clear evidence gathering, the rating decision and authorization.

A returned exam is the invisible delay
The reason a tracker slides backward
A returned or clarified exam is the most common invisible delay, and it is why a tracker can slide backward. Expect some contact from the VA within 30 to 60 days of the exam. Past 60 days with nothing at all, call and ask specifically what the claim is waiting on.

30 to 60 days is a guide, not a deadline
A complex case can take 90 days or more
Thirty to sixty days is a rough average for a simple, single-issue claim — not a hard rule and not a ceiling. A claim with several conditions, a presumptive or toxic-exposure question, a returned exam, or missing records can easily take 90 days or more, and that alone does not mean anything is wrong. Watch whether the claim is still moving, not the calendar. Only when it stalls well past what is normal for a case like yours, and no one can tell you what it is waiting on, should you stop waiting — call 800-827-1000 and ask what the claim is waiting on and who it is assigned to.

Watch your status yourself — in one of three places
Weekly, not daily
Check your own status in one of three places: your VA.gov claim status page, the VA Health and Benefits mobile app, or by calling 800-827-1000. Check it weekly, not daily. And understand exactly what a status check can tell you: if a decision is posted in your account, it is live; if it is not posted, it is not ready. That is the whole rule. This is not something your representative or your attorney can speed up — we see the same thing you see, at the same time, and calling us to ask does not move it. Calling the VA to ask for an update does not move it either. Watch it yourself, weekly, and the moment a decision posts, bring it to us.

Your decision letter arrives — read it, then start the appeal clock
What to do the day it lands in your mailbox
The decision letter is the finish line of the claim and the starting line of the appeal — and the moment it arrives, a one-year clock starts running. Read it the same day. Find the combined rating, the percentage assigned to each condition, and the effective date, because the effective date controls how far back your back pay reaches. Then request a copy of your C&P exam report so you can see whether the rater used your real range-of-motion numbers or ignored the radiculopathy. If any part of the decision is wrong — a low rating, a denied condition, or a bad effective date — you have three appeal lanes, and you must choose one within one year of the date printed on the letter: a **Higher-Level Review (VA Form 20-0996)**, where a senior reviewer re-decides on the same evidence; a **Supplemental Claim (VA Form 20-0995)**, when you have new and relevant evidence such as a private DBQ or your own range-of-motion exam; or a **Board Appeal (VA Form 10182)** to a Veterans Law Judge. Miss that one-year deadline and the decision becomes final. You can still file again later, but you lose the original effective date — and that lost time is lost back pay you never get back. Bring the letter to this office before the year runs out and we will read it with you, line by line, at no cost.
07Remedy
How to report a bad exam
Where this exam goes wrong
Being dismissed with "non-cardiac chest pain, etiology undetermined" instead of a mapped, service-connected intercostal nerve.

Write it down the moment you get to your car
Date, start time, end time, the examiner’s name and credentials, the vendor, every test that was performed, and every test that was not. A contemporaneous note written the same day is evidence. A memory reconstructed four months later is not.

Get the exam report and the questionnaire
Request a copy through VA.gov, through a written request to the Regional Office, or by calling 800-827-1000. You cannot challenge what you have not read. Compare it line by line against what actually happened in the room.

Name the defect specifically, with the citation
Never write "the exam was unfair." Write "no goniometer was used, contrary to 38 CFR §4.46" or "flare-ups were reported and not addressed, contrary to Sharp v. Shulkin" or "repetitive use testing was not performed, contrary to 38 CFR §4.40 and DeLuca." A specific, citable defect is what forces action.

Submit a statement asking for a new examination
VA Form 21-4138, Statement in Support of Claim, filed through VA.gov or mailed to the Evidence Intake Center. State the defect, cite the authority, and request a new or supplemental examination. Do this BEFORE the decision if the claim is still open — it is far easier than undoing a decision afterward.

Report examiner conduct separately
If the problem is behavior rather than methodology — you were rushed out, dismissed, never touched, or treated with hostility — file a complaint with the VA facility’s Patient Advocate, or with the vendor directly for a contract exam, and copy the Regional Office. Conduct complaints and adequacy challenges are two different tracks and you can run both.

If a decision has already issued, pick the right lane
A Higher-Level Review (VA Form 20-0996) argues the VA erred on the evidence it had — the right vehicle when the exam was inadequate on its face. A Supplemental Claim (VA Form 20-0995) is the vehicle when you are adding new and relevant evidence, such as your own private range-of-motion examination or a completed DBQ from your treating provider.

Put your own measurements on the table
A private examination with full goniometric measurements, or a DBQ completed by your own provider, creates a conflict in the evidence that the VA has to resolve — and under 38 CFR §3.102 reasonable doubt is resolved in your favor.
End of clinical section
Intercostal Neuralgia — DC 8620 / 8720
See It Before You Sit In The Room
Intercostal Nerve Anatomy
Nabil Ebraheim, MD
Intercostal Neuralgia — Causes, Symptoms and Treatment
Rehab Science
The Questions Veterans Actually Ask
Intercostal Neuralgia Claims — Frequently Asked Questions
Straight answers to the questions that decide intercostal neuralgia claims — the ratings, the separate evaluations, and the exam mistakes that cost veterans money.
Intercostal Neuralgia is evaluated under DC 8620 / 8720. The scale runs across 3 rating levels, and the highest is Neuritis, which the VA assigns for: dC 8620 — neuritis of the intercostal nerve is rated on the severity of the sensory and any motor involvement, graded moderate or severe by analogy to the nerve criteria in §4.123. Where your evaluation actually lands depends on how your exam and records document those criteria — not on how bad the condition feels on an average day.
Every condition in Thoracic Secondary Conditions
Three Ways to Put an Accredited Agent on Your Case
No fee unless you win. An accredited agent #45147 personally reviews every request — we respond within 48 hours.
Book a Free Consultation
Pick a time to talk through your VA claim with our team — no pressure, no obligation.
Hire Us · File VA Form 21-22a
Appoint us as your accredited representative and get registered as a client so we can act on your behalf.
Call an Accredited Agent
Speak to a real person on our team right now.
702-992-4883
