American veterans of every branch standing together before the United States flag at dusk
Veterans Fighting For Veterans

We sit shoulder‑to‑shoulder with veterans and fight to win the benefits you earned.

Free ConsultationNo Fees Unless You Win
Three-dimensional anatomical render of the inner ear and cochlea in a dark cinematic setting, with no labels or markings
Tinnitus & Hearing Loss — all conditions
DC 6260 · #45147

Tinnitus — Recurrent Ringing, Buzzing, or Hissing in the Ears

The ringing never stops. It is the sound of cochlear damage the military caused — and the VA rates it as a secondary condition linked to the hearing loss, the blast exposure, or the TBI that came first.

Tinnitus is the single most-claimed VA disability — and yet most veterans file it wrong. They claim it as a standalone primary condition and get denied or undervalued. The stronger path is to claim tinnitus secondary to an already service-connected condition — sensorineural hearing loss, traumatic brain injury, PTSD, or another condition whose nexus is already established. Under 38 CFR §3.310(a), a disability that is proximately due to or the result of a service-connected disease or injury is itself service-connected. When the hearing loss is already rated, the tinnitus rides with it — because the same cochlear damage that destroyed the hair cells is what produces the ringing. That is not a theory; it is the mechanism every audiologist in the country will confirm.

Before Anything Gets Rated

What The VA Is Actually Looking For — And What Service Connection Really Means

Before the VA ever opens the rating schedule, it asks one question: is this disability the government’s responsibility? That is what “service connection” means. It is not a diagnosis, it is not sympathy, and it is not a reward for having served. It is a legal finding that a current, diagnosed disability is linked to something that happened to you in uniform. Percentages come later. If service connection is not established, there is nothing to rate and the claim is denied — no matter how bad the tinnitus is.

A veteran reviewing a VA decision letter at his desk, hands gripping the document

The three elements the VA must find. All three. Every time.

These come out of Caluza v. Brown and Shedden v. Principi, and they are the checklist a rating officer works through on your file. Miss one and the claim fails on that element alone.

1

A current, diagnosed disability

A doctor has to have written a diagnosis in a medical record — tinnitus. Symptoms by themselves are not a disability the VA can rate. Saunders v. Wilkie held that pain causing functional impairment can be a disability, but you still need a clinician to document it as diagnosed and impairing. The diagnosis must exist now, during the claim period — not only years ago.

2

An in-service event, injury, illness or aggravation

Something in service had to have happened — an injury, an exposure, a documented sick call, or steady wear over a career. It does not have to be one dramatic moment and it does not have to be spelled out in your service treatment records: buddy statements, unit records, performance evaluations and your own competent lay testimony can establish it.

3

A medical nexus linking the two

A qualified medical opinion that says the current diagnosis is at least as likely as not related to the in-service event. That phrase matters: at least as likely as not means 50 percent or better. Under 38 C.F.R. §3.102, when the evidence is evenly balanced, the benefit of the doubt goes to you and the claim must be granted.

The five ways service connection is established

Most veterans only know the first one. The other routes are lower-effort paths to the same grant — and the secondary route is the one most often left on the table.

Direct — 38 C.F.R. §3.303(a)

The injury or disease began in service and never went away. The classic route: three elements, one nexus opinion.

Chronicity and continuity — §3.303(b)

A chronic condition shown in service, plus continuity of the same symptoms from separation to now, can establish the link without a formal nexus opinion. Your own testimony about symptoms you can observe is competent evidence.

Presumptive — §3.307 and §3.309

Certain chronic diseases are presumed service connected if they manifest to a compensable degree within a set window after separation. You do not have to prove causation at all.

Secondary — §3.310(a) and (b)

A disability proximately due to, or aggravated by, an already service-connected condition is itself service connected. This is how the downstream conditions tinnitus sets off get on the rating sheet.

Aggravation of a pre-service condition — §3.306

If you entered service with a condition and service made it permanently worse, the increase is compensable. The VA must rebut the presumption of soundness by clear and unmistakable evidence — a bar it frequently fails to meet.

VA medical care — 38 U.S.C. §1151

An additional disability caused by VA treatment, surgery, or a failure to diagnose is compensated as if it were service connected.

The bottom line — there is no way around this

No diagnosis, no rating. It has to be chronic. It has to cause impairment.

Without a diagnosis, the VA will not rate your claim.

The rating schedule is a list of diagnosed conditions and the codes attached to them. If no clinician has put a name on your condition in a medical record, there is no code to assign. Symptoms reported to a claims examiner are not a diagnosis. Get in front of a doctor and get it written down.

The condition must be chronic.

Chronic means persistent and ongoing — not something that resolved decades ago. The VA compensates a disability you carry today, which is why a documented, continuing treatment history matters more than the single worst day you ever had.

It must cause actual impairment.

Under 38 C.F.R. §4.1 and §4.10, VA compensation exists to pay for reduction in earning capacity. A diagnosis that costs you nothing gets a zero percent rating. The function you have lost is what converts a diagnosis into a percentage.

What this means for you before you file: get the diagnosis in writing, get the treatment history documented so the chronicity is undeniable, and describe the impairment in functional terms — what you can no longer do, and what it costs you at work and at home. Everything on the rest of this page is built on top of those three things.

The Percentages

Rating Schedule — Tinnitus, Diagnostic Code 6260

Reproduced verbatim from 38 CFR §4.87. Tinnitus carries a single flat rating regardless of severity or laterality. The value of this rating is in the combination — it adds 10 percent on top of whatever primary condition it is secondary to, and in VA combined-rating math, every point matters.

An audiologist and a veteran seated together in a sound-treated audiology booth during a hearing evaluation

10%

Recurrent tinnitus.

Note

A separate evaluation for tinnitus may be combined with an evaluation under diagnostic codes 6100, 6200, 6204, or other diagnostic code, except when tinnitus supports an evaluation under one of those diagnostic codes. Only a single evaluation for recurrent tinnitus will be assigned, whether the sound is perceived in one ear, both ears, or in the head.

Service Connection

Advice from the Advocate

Microscopic render of damaged cochlear hair cells inside the inner ear, some bent and broken from noise exposure
The same cochlear hair-cell damage that causes sensorineural hearing loss produces tinnitus. The cells do not regenerate — once bent or broken by noise exposure, the phantom signal they send to the brain is the ringing that never stops.

The advocate's notes on causation — Tinnitus

The separate arguments that decide this code: where the VA will attack, the regulation that answers it, and the evidence that closes the gap.

A veterans disability advocate seated at a professional desk, ready to explain why tinnitus is claimed as a secondary condition
  1. 1Secondary to sensorineural hearing loss — the same damage, the same rating path — §3.310(a)

    The strongest nexus for tinnitus is §3.310(a): a disability that is proximately due to or the result of a service-connected condition shall be service-connected. The cochlear hair cells that detect sound are the same cells whose damage produces tinnitus. When the hearing loss is already service-connected, the tinnitus is a direct physiological consequence of the same injury — not a separate event, but the same mechanism presenting a second symptom. Any audiologist will confirm that sensorineural hearing loss and tinnitus are functionally inseparable.

  2. 2Secondary to traumatic brain injury or blast exposure — §3.310(a)

    Blast-wave overpressure damages the auditory cortex and the cochlea simultaneously. If a TBI is already service-connected, tinnitus is a recognized sequela under §3.310(a). The VA's own TBI examination protocol asks about tinnitus as an expected consequence. A nexus opinion linking the ringing to the blast or concussive event is straightforward medical causation — the pressure wave that shook the brain also shook the ear.

  3. 3Aggravation by service-connected PTSD, anxiety, or depression — §3.310(b)

    38 CFR §3.310(b) separately grants service connection for aggravation of a nonservice-connected condition by a service-connected one. The medical literature is clear: stress, anxiety, and hypervigilance amplify tinnitus perception — and PTSD produces all three. If the veteran's tinnitus is worsened by a service-connected mental-health condition, that aggravation is independently compensable. Document the cycle: the anxiety makes the ringing louder, and the louder ringing feeds the anxiety.

  4. 4MOS noise exposure corroborates the mechanism — the Duty MOS Noise Exposure Listing

    The VA maintains a Duty MOS Noise Exposure Listing that rates each military specialty for its probability of hazardous noise. When a veteran's MOS carries a "Highly Probable" or "Probable" noise-exposure rating, it corroborates the causal chain from service noise to cochlear damage to tinnitus. This is not a standalone nexus — it supports the secondary link by proving the mechanism that produced the primary condition also produced the tinnitus.

  5. 5Continuity of ringing from the same in-service event — §3.303(b) and Buchanan

    Even where the medical record is thin, 38 CFR §3.303(b) allows service connection on continuity of symptomatology, and the Federal Circuit held in Buchanan v. Nicholson, 451 F.3d 1331 (Fed. Cir. 2006) that the absence of contemporaneous records cannot be the sole basis for rejecting competent lay testimony. Tinnitus is inherently subjective — no instrument measures it — so the veteran's sworn statement that the ringing began with the explosion, the flight line, or the gun crew and has never stopped is competent and probative evidence supporting the secondary connection to the primary noise injury.

Exposure & Aggravation

How Tinnitus Happens In Service — And How It Gets Worse

How veterans pick this up in uniform — Tinnitus

Tinnitus rarely announces itself with one dramatic moment. It is built by what service asked of your body over months and years — and once it is service-connected, it is compensated for how it keeps getting worse, not for how it started. Below is how veterans pick this up in uniform, and who is most prone to it.

  • Artillery, mortar, and heavy-weapons fire — the concussive blast hits the cochlea before you can cover your ears
  • Flight-line and aircraft-engine noise sustained over years of maintenance, launch, and recovery operations
  • Small-arms qualification and live-fire exercises with inadequate or inconsistently worn hearing protection
  • IED blasts, rocket attacks, and explosive breaching in theater — the pressure wave damages the inner ear directly
  • Tracked-vehicle and heavy-equipment operation — tanks, APCs, generators, and diesel engines at sustained decibels
  • Communications headsets worn at high volume for hours in aircraft, vehicles, and tactical operations centers
  • Ship engine rooms, boiler spaces, and below-deck machinery in the Navy and Coast Guard
  • Combat-engineer demolition, construction equipment, and power-tool operation without consistent ear protection

Who is most prone to it

Artillery, infantry, armor, combat engineers, aircraft mechanics, flight crews, Navy machinist's mates and enginemen, military police, Special Operations, and any MOS whose duty description includes sustained exposure to hazardous noise levels as documented in the VA's Duty MOS Noise Exposure Listing.

The Symptoms

What Tinnitus Actually Feels Like

  • A constant or recurring ringing in one or both ears that never fully goes away
  • A high-pitched hissing, buzzing, whistling, or roaring that varies in intensity throughout the day
  • The noise gets louder in quiet rooms, at bedtime, and during periods of stress
  • Difficulty falling asleep or staying asleep because the ringing fills the silence
  • Trouble following conversations in noisy environments — the tinnitus competes with the speech
  • Difficulty concentrating at work or reading because the sound pulls your attention
  • Irritability, frustration, and emotional exhaustion from the unrelenting noise
  • Anxiety or dread about silence — because that is when the ringing is loudest and inescapable

How this one is rated

Tinnitus is rated at a flat 10 percent under Diagnostic Code 6260, whether the sound is in one ear, both ears, or perceived in the head. There is no higher schedular rating for tinnitus alone — but that single 10 percent stacks on top of the hearing-loss rating, the TBI rating, or whatever primary condition it is secondary to, and the combined total matters enormously at the margins.

What you are measured against

The examiner documents onset, character (ringing, buzzing, hissing), frequency (constant or intermittent), and whether the veteran can identify the in-service noise event that triggered it. There is no audiometric threshold for tinnitus — it is subjective by nature and the veteran's competent lay report is the primary evidence.

Each One On Its Own Page

Secondary Conditions — Aggravated or Caused by a Current Service-Connected Condition

Under 38 CFR §3.310(a), a disability that is proximately due to a service-connected condition is service-connected in its own right — and under §3.310(b), so is any additional disability caused when a service-connected condition aggravates a problem you already had. Each condition below is a separate evaluation with its own diagnostic code and its own percentage. They do not fold into the tinnitus rating — they stack on top of it. A veteran who claims only the primary condition leaves these ratings on the table.

A woman sitting upright in bed at night looking distressed and unable to sleep in a dimly lit bedroom

Hearing loss — the primary condition tinnitus rides with

Sensorineural hearing loss and tinnitus share the same mechanism: noise-induced cochlear hair-cell damage. Under §3.310(a), if the hearing loss is already service-connected, the tinnitus is a direct physiological consequence of the same injury. The two conditions are rated under separate diagnostic codes (6100 and 6260) and the evaluations combine — they are not pyramiding because they compensate different functional losses.

An audiologist carefully fitting a hearing aid on a veteran during a clinical appointment

Mental-health aggravation — anxiety, depression, and PTSD

The medical literature is unambiguous: stress and hypervigilance amplify tinnitus perception, and chronic tinnitus drives anxiety and depression. Under §3.310(b), if a service-connected mental-health condition aggravates the tinnitus beyond its natural progression, that aggravation is separately compensable. Document the cycle with your mental-health provider — the louder the ringing, the worse the anxiety, the louder the ringing.

A man in glasses and a jacket sitting at a table looking overwhelmed and stressed

Occupational impairment and the TDIU path

Tinnitus alone is rated at 10%, but when combined with hearing loss, PTSD, and the functional limitations they produce together, the total can reach the TDIU threshold under §4.16. A veteran who cannot follow conversations in a work environment, cannot concentrate because of the ringing, and cannot tolerate the stress of employment because the noise worsens under pressure has a straight line to individual unemployability. Document every work task the tinnitus has impaired.

Accredited Claims Agent #45147

Ready To Get This Rated Correctly?

Contingency fee — zero upfront, paid only from back pay when you win. If your rating does not increase, you owe nothing.

Tinnitus & Hearing Loss, In Detail

Tinnitus & Hearing Loss — Service Connection In Depth

Here is each claimable condition in this group on its own terms — what it is, what service did to it, and what the VA requires before it will connect it.

Three-dimensional anatomical render of the inner ear and cochlea in a dark cinematic setting, with no labels or markings
DC 6260

Tinnitus — Recurrent Ringing, Buzzing, or Hissing in the Ears

Tinnitus is the single most-claimed VA disability — and yet most veterans file it wrong. They claim it as a standalone primary condition and get denied or undervalued. The stronger path is to claim tinnitus secondary to an already service-connected condition — sensorineural hearing loss, traumatic brain injury, PTSD, or another condition whose nexus is already established. Under 38 CFR §3.310(a), a disability that is proximately due to or the result of a service-connected disease or injury is itself service-connected. When the hearing loss is already rated, the tinnitus rides with it — because the same cochlear damage that destroyed the hair cells is what produces the ringing. That is not a theory; it is the mechanism every audiologist in the country will confirm.

You are reading this page now

Three-dimensional anatomical render of the human auditory system including the ear canal, ossicles, and cochlea in a dark cinematic setting with no labels or markings
DC 6100

Sensorineural Hearing Loss — Bilateral and Unilateral

Hearing loss is one of the most common service-connected disabilities — and one of the most mechanically rated. The VA does not decide your percentage by listening to your story. It takes two numbers from your audiology exam — your puretone threshold average and your Maryland CNC speech-discrimination score — and feeds them into Table VI of 38 CFR §4.85 to produce a Roman-numeral designation for each ear. Then it cross-references the two Roman numerals in Table VII to produce your percentage. The entire rating turns on those two numbers. If the exam is done wrong — the wrong word list, the wrong frequencies, an untreated ear infection distorting the results — the numbers are wrong and so is your rating. Understanding the mechanics is how you protect yourself.

Read the full Hearing Loss page

The C&P Exam

What To Expect At The Tinnitus Exam

This is the encounter your rating is built on. The examiner has a checklist and a limited window — what follows is exactly what happens in that room, so none of it surprises you.

Clinical Section — What To Expect at the Exam

What to Expect at Your Tinnitus C&P Examination

Diagnostic Code 6260 — this exam establishes the secondary link to your primary condition

The tinnitus C&P exam is shorter than most — the examiner cannot measure a sound only you can hear. What makes or breaks this exam is the **connection to the primary condition**. The examiner will ask when the ringing started, what you were doing when it began, and whether it has been constant or intermittent since then. Your job is to draw a straight line from the in-service noise event, the blast, or the head injury that caused your primary condition to the onset of the ringing — because that is the nexus the rater needs to grant the secondary connection under §3.310.

Condition

Tinnitus — DC 6260

Governing questionnaire

VA Form 21-0960N-2, Tinnitus Disability Benefits Questionnaire

Click the form number to open the official questionnaire on VA.gov.

01In The Room

What happens during the exam

The tests and maneuvers for this condition

  • Detailed interview on tinnitus onset, character, and frequency
  • Puretone audiometric testing (for the paired hearing-loss evaluation)
  • Maryland CNC speech-recognition testing
  • Otoscopic examination of the ear canal and tympanic membrane
  • Review of audiograms and hearing-conservation records from service
  • Review of any TBI or blast-exposure documentation
  • Assessment of functional impact on daily activities and employment
  • Nexus opinion on the relationship between tinnitus and the primary service-connected condition

What gets measured, and to what number

Onset and duration

When the tinnitus began, what triggered it, and whether it has been constant or intermittent since onset.

Character of the sound

Ringing, buzzing, hissing, roaring, clicking, or pulsing — and whether the character has changed over time.

Laterality

Whether the sound is in the left ear, right ear, both ears, or perceived in the head. The rating is the same regardless, but laterality ties to the mechanism.

Functional impact

How the tinnitus affects sleep, concentration, work performance, conversation, and emotional state.

Relationship to primary condition

Whether the tinnitus onset coincides with the event or condition it is claimed secondary to — hearing loss, TBI, blast exposure, or mental-health diagnosis.

02Orientation

What to expect during this exam

What makes this exam different from every other C&P exam

1Tinnitus is subjective — your testimony IS the evidence

There is no audiometric test that detects tinnitus. The examiner cannot verify or disprove it with a machine. Your competent lay report — when it started, how it sounds, how often it occurs — is the primary evidence. Describe it specifically: a high-pitched ringing, a low hum, a hissing, constant or intermittent. Vague answers give the examiner nothing to document.

2The flat 10% is the only schedular rate — but it stacks

There is no 20% or 30% for tinnitus. Diagnostic Code 6260 provides a single 10-percent evaluation. The value is in the combination — that 10% adds to your hearing loss, your TBI, or your PTSD rating. Under VA combined-rating math, 10% on top of 50% is not 60% — it is 55% — but that difference can cross a threshold that changes your monthly check.

3Onset timing is everything for the secondary link

The examiner will ask when the ringing started. If it started during or shortly after the same noise exposure, blast, or injury that caused your primary condition, say so precisely. "The ringing started right after the mortar attack that gave me the hearing loss" is a nexus sentence. "I've always had some ringing" is not.

See it before you sit in the room

03Preparation

Know your symptoms and secondary factors

What the report must actually say about tinnitus — dc 6260

  • "The ringing started when ____" — name the specific in-service event: the blast, the artillery, the flight line, the head injury.
  • "It has been constant since then" — if true, say it. Continuity of symptoms is the backbone of the nexus.
  • "It is worse at night and in quiet rooms" — this documents the functional impact the rater needs.
  • "I cannot concentrate at work because of it" — occupational impact supports a TDIU claim down the line.
  • "My audiologist said it is related to my hearing loss" — if a provider has linked them, say so on the record.
  • "It makes my anxiety worse and my anxiety makes it louder" — if PTSD or anxiety is already service-connected, document the aggravation cycle.

Pain level, frequency, lost work and functional loss — how to say them

A veteran lying awake in bed unable to sleep, staring at the ceiling in a dimly lit room

Pin the onset to the in-service event

The examiner needs a nexus sentence — a clear causal link between the military noise exposure and the ringing. "It started when" followed by a specific event is the most powerful thing you can say. Do not generalize. Name the event, the date if you know it, and the unit you were with. That sentence goes directly into the examiner's opinion.

If it was gradual rather than sudden, say "It started building during my time on the flight line at Kadena" — a gradual onset is still a nexus.

"The ringing started the day of the mortar attack outside Fallujah in 2005 and it has not stopped since."

A soldier firing a rifle on an open range with visible muzzle flash, depicting military noise exposure

Describe the noise exposure that caused your primary condition

The tinnitus claim rides on the primary condition. If your hearing loss is already service-connected from artillery noise, the tinnitus is the same injury presenting a second symptom. Describe the noise environment in detail — how loud, how long, how often, and what hearing protection was or was not available. The examiner is building the same causal chain your hearing-loss exam already established.

Reference your MOS and the VA's Duty MOS Noise Exposure Listing if your specialty carries a "Highly Probable" rating.

"I was a 13B cannon crewmember for six years. We fired thousands of rounds. We had foam plugs sometimes, nothing other times. The hearing loss is already service-connected — the ringing is the same damage."

An older man sitting at a desk with his hand to his head, appearing distracted and unable to concentrate

Describe how the ringing destroys concentration and sleep

The flat 10% rate cannot be raised on the schedule, but the functional impact supports a future TDIU claim and strengthens the secondary-condition argument. An examiner who documents that tinnitus prevents sustained work concentration is building a record you can use later. Do not downplay it — say exactly what the ringing takes away from you every day.

Mention if you use a sound machine, white noise, or the television to mask it — those are compensating behaviors that prove severity.

"I cannot read for more than ten minutes before the ringing pulls me away. I run a fan all night just to sleep. Without the noise I would be staring at the ceiling."

A veteran covering both ears with his hands in visible distress from overwhelming auditory sensation

Name the aggravation cycle with your mental-health condition

If PTSD, anxiety, or depression is already service-connected, document the two-way aggravation: the mental-health condition makes the tinnitus louder, and the louder tinnitus feeds the anxiety. Under §3.310(b), aggravation of a nonservice-connected condition by a service-connected one is independently compensable — and the reverse direction strengthens the mental-health claim too.

If your psychiatrist or therapist has noted the connection, say so. Clinical documentation of the cycle is powerful.

"When my PTSD flares up the ringing gets much worse. And then the ringing keeps me from sleeping, which makes the PTSD worse. My therapist has noted that cycle in my records."

Secondary conditions to raise in the same appointment

A woman sitting upright in bed at night looking distressed and unable to sleep in a dimly lit bedroom

Hearing loss — the primary condition tinnitus rides with

Sensorineural hearing loss and tinnitus share the same mechanism: noise-induced cochlear hair-cell damage. Under §3.310(a), if the hearing loss is already service-connected, the tinnitus is a direct physiological consequence of the same injury. The two conditions are rated under separate diagnostic codes (6100 and 6260) and the evaluations combine — they are not pyramiding because they compensate different functional losses.

An audiologist carefully fitting a hearing aid on a veteran during a clinical appointment

Mental-health aggravation — anxiety, depression, and PTSD

The medical literature is unambiguous: stress and hypervigilance amplify tinnitus perception, and chronic tinnitus drives anxiety and depression. Under §3.310(b), if a service-connected mental-health condition aggravates the tinnitus beyond its natural progression, that aggravation is separately compensable. Document the cycle with your mental-health provider — the louder the ringing, the worse the anxiety, the louder the ringing.

A man in glasses and a jacket sitting at a table looking overwhelmed and stressed

Occupational impairment and the TDIU path

Tinnitus alone is rated at 10%, but when combined with hearing loss, PTSD, and the functional limitations they produce together, the total can reach the TDIU threshold under §4.16. A veteran who cannot follow conversations in a work environment, cannot concentrate because of the ringing, and cannot tolerate the stress of employment because the noise worsens under pressure has a straight line to individual unemployability. Document every work task the tinnitus has impaired.

How to prepare for this specific exam

  • Bring the records for the primary condition this claim is secondary to — the hearing-loss rating, the TBI diagnosis, the blast-exposure documentation.
  • Write a timeline: the in-service noise event, when the ringing started, and every provider who has documented it since.
  • Bring a buddy statement from someone who has witnessed you reacting to the tinnitus — turning up volume, asking people to repeat, complaining of ringing.
  • Bring hearing-conservation records from your military service if you have them — they document the noise exposure.
  • Do not wear earplugs or use a sound machine the night before — arrive with the tinnitus at its unmasked baseline.
  • If you have a statement from your treating audiologist linking tinnitus to your hearing loss or TBI, bring it.

04The Protocol

What procedures are required during the exam

These are not courtesies. Each comes out of the regulation or out of binding case law. Take this list in with you and tick them off as they happen.

A veteran seated in a sound booth wearing audiometry headphones, raising a finger to signal that a tone was heard
Fig. 01Puretone audiometric testing — establishing the paired hearing loss

01Puretone audiometric testing — establishing the paired hearing loss

38 C.F.R. §4.87

The audiologist places you in a sound-treated booth and delivers tones at specific frequencies (1000, 2000, 3000, and 4000 Hz) through headphones. You raise your hand or press a button each time you hear a tone. The results produce a puretone threshold average for each ear that feeds directly into the Table VI / Table VII hearing-loss rating — and that hearing-loss rating is the primary condition your tinnitus claim rides on.

The puretone audiogram is the objective foundation of the hearing-loss diagnosis. Without it, the primary condition is not documented, and the secondary tinnitus claim has nothing to attach to.

An audiologist speaking into a microphone while conducting a speech-recognition test with a veteran wearing audiometry headphones
Fig. 02Maryland CNC speech-recognition testing — the word-recognition score

02Maryland CNC speech-recognition testing — the word-recognition score

38 C.F.R. §4.87

The audiologist reads a standardized list of single-syllable words through a speaker or headphones and you repeat each word back. Your percentage correct is the speech-discrimination score that combines with the puretone average to produce the Roman-numeral designation under Table VI. A low speech-recognition score can push a hearing-loss rating higher than the puretone average alone would produce — and a higher hearing-loss rating strengthens the combined total that includes tinnitus.

The Maryland CNC test is the only speech-recognition instrument the VA accepts for rating purposes. If the examiner uses a different word list, the exam is inadequate under §4.85.

An audiologist adjusting an audiometer while seated beside a patient during a clinical hearing evaluation
Fig. 03Tinnitus-specific interview — onset, character, and functional impact

03Tinnitus-specific interview — onset, character, and functional impact

38 C.F.R. §4.87

The examiner asks when the ringing started, what it sounds like, whether it is constant or intermittent, and how it affects your daily life. This is the core of the tinnitus evaluation because there is no machine that detects it. Your answers are the evidence. Be specific about onset timing, the character of the sound, and the functional consequences — every detail ties the tinnitus to the in-service event that caused the primary condition.

A detailed, consistent interview is the only way the examiner can document tinnitus. Vague or inconsistent answers give the rater grounds to deny the secondary connection.

A clinician using an otoscope to examine a veteran's ear canal during an audiology evaluation
Fig. 04Otoscopic examination — ruling out a correctable cause

04Otoscopic examination — ruling out a correctable cause

38 C.F.R. §4.87

The examiner looks into the ear canal with an otoscope to check for cerumen impaction, perforation of the tympanic membrane, or other structural causes of tinnitus. A perforated eardrum from a blast is a separately ratable condition under Diagnostic Code 6211. If the examiner finds one, that perforation is additional evidence of the in-service injury mechanism — and another secondary claim.

The otoscopic exam documents the physical state of the ear canal and eardrum. A blast-related perforation strengthens the nexus to the in-service event.

A physician holding an older patient's hand across a desk during an empathetic medical consultation
Fig. 05Nexus opinion — the secondary-connection determination

05Nexus opinion — the secondary-connection determination

38 C.F.R. §4.87

The examiner issues an opinion on whether the tinnitus is at least as likely as not proximately due to, the result of, or aggravated by the service-connected primary condition. This is the sentence the rater reads. If the opinion is negative, read it carefully — an examiner who denies the link solely because tinnitus is subjective and unmeasurable has applied the wrong standard, and that opinion can be challenged under 38 CFR §4.2.

The nexus opinion is the gate. A favorable opinion with a clear rationale ties the tinnitus to the primary condition and the secondary claim is granted. An unfavorable one must be scrutinized for adequacy.

05The Standard

What makes an exam adequate

Read your exam report against these. An exam that fails the standard is legally inadequate, and an inadequate exam is something you challenge rather than accept.

01

The range of motion has to be MEASURED, not estimated

38 CFR §4.46 states that the use of a goniometer in the measurement of limitation of motion is indispensable in examinations conducted within the Department of Veterans Affairs. An examiner who eyeballs your bend and writes a number has not complied with the regulation. This is the most common defect in a spine exam and it is the easiest one to spot from the chair.

02

Joints must be tested in every required condition

Under Correia v. McDonald, a joint examination for pain must, wherever possible, record active motion, passive motion, motion in weight-bearing and motion in non-weight-bearing — and where relevant, the range of the opposite undamaged joint. An exam that records one set of numbers and stops is incomplete on its face, and that incompleteness is grounds to challenge it.

03

Flare-ups have to be addressed, not dodged

Under Sharp v. Shulkin, when a veteran describes flare-ups, the examiner is obligated to estimate the additional loss of motion during a flare based on all the available evidence — including your own account of it. "I cannot opine without resorting to mere speculation" is not automatically acceptable; the examiner has to have actually sought the information first and explained why an estimate is impossible.

04

Repetitive use and functional loss must be factored in

Sections 4.40 and 4.45, and the DeLuca line of cases, require that pain, weakness, fatigability, incoordination and lack of endurance after repeated use be considered — and expressed in additional degrees of lost motion where that is feasible. Your rating is supposed to reflect what you can do on the fifth repetition and on a bad day, not just the first careful bend of the morning.

05

Neurological findings must be separately documented

Note (1) to the General Rating Formula requires that any associated objective neurologic abnormality be evaluated separately under an appropriate diagnostic code. If your leg symptoms were mentioned in the narrative but never tested and never assigned, the exam did not do what the schedule requires of it.

06

The examiner must review the record when the question requires it

Where a medical opinion on cause, aggravation or a secondary relationship was requested, the examiner is expected to review the relevant evidence and give a reasoned explanation. A bare conclusion — "less likely than not related to service" with no reasoning attached — carries little weight, and an opinion with no rationale is challengeable.

07

The examiner has to be qualified for the body system

The VA may use its own clinicians or a contract vendor. Either way, the examiner is expected to have the competence to evaluate the system being examined. If a spinal exam with a neurological component was performed by someone who never tested a reflex, that is a problem worth raising.

08

The exam has to be CURRENT

A rating is supposed to reflect your condition now. An exam performed before a documented worsening, or years before the decision, may not support the current evaluation — and you can request a new one on that basis.

06Afterward

What happens after your exam is complete

The examiner writes the report and submits it, it is reviewed for completeness, and only then does the claim move toward a rating decision. Here is what actually controls the clock.

Examiner at a desk completing and submitting the exam questionnaire
01

The examiner writes and submits the report

Days 1–5 after the exam

The examiner compiles the history, the physical findings, the measurements and any testing into the questionnaire, adds any requested medical opinion, and submits it. Contract vendors typically have a turnaround requirement measured in days, not weeks.

Nothing about your claim moves while this is happening, and nothing you do speeds it up. What matters is that the report is written from notes taken in the room — which is exactly why what you said, and how the examiner recorded it, is already locked in by the time you get to your car. Request your copy now rather than later.

Reviewer flagging an incomplete field and sending the exam report back to the examiner
02

Quality review — and the request for clarification

Days 3–30

The report is reviewed for completeness. If it is internally inconsistent, missing a required field or missing the opinion the VA asked for, it goes back for correction or a second opinion. This is the single most common cause of a claim appearing to stall after the exam.

Understand what a finished exam actually means: it means the appointment happened, not that your claim is ready for a decision. If the reviewer finds a blank range-of-motion field, an opinion that does not answer the question that was asked, or findings that contradict each other, the file goes back out for more information. That is a normal quality control step, not a rejection of your claim, and it is not a sign that you did something wrong — but it does add weeks, and it is the reason so much of what you read online sounds like the system is broken.

Claim status tracker on a screen showing the progress bar jumped backward from a late step to an early step
03

Your status tracker moves backward — and it is usually not bad news

Any time after the exam

The online tracker shows eight steps. Veterans watch it reach step 7 or 8, then find it back at step 3 or 4 a week later. That regression almost always means one thing: the file went back for additional information, most often a returned or clarified exam.

This is the number one thing veterans panic about, and it is misread constantly. The tracker is not a countdown — it is a location marker. When the VA decides it needs one more piece of evidence, a corrected exam, a clarifying medical opinion or an outstanding record, the claim is routed back to the evidence gathering step and the bar redraws itself where the file physically is. It does not mean a denial. It does not mean your case was thrown out or restarted. It does not erase anything already in the file, and it does not change your effective date. What it does mean is that something in the record was not good enough to decide on yet — which is worth knowing, because if the weak link is the exam, this is the window where a corrective statement or a private opinion from your own doctor does the most good.

Medical records folders being handed across a counter as the evidence gathering window closes
04

Evidence gathering closes

Varies

Before anyone rates your claim, the file has to be built. This is the stretch where the Regional Office pulls together everything the decision will rest on: your service treatment records, your VA medical records, any federal records, the C&P exam report, and any private records it has requested on your behalf. The claim sits here until the VA is satisfied the record is complete enough to decide — which is exactly why a status tracker can appear to stall or slide backward at this step. You are not powerless while it sits here. Anything you put into the file yourself lands the day you send it, and every relevant record you add now is one less thing the rater can later say was missing.

A VA request to a private provider is a letter that may or may not be answered, and the VA will wait on it for weeks before moving on — sometimes without ever getting a response. A record you walk in yourself, or upload through your claim, is in the file the day you send it. So do not sit and wait to be asked. If you know a treatment record, an imaging report, a surgical note or a buddy statement exists and it matters, send it now, with a VA Form 21-4138 statement that explains in plain words what the document is and what it shows. This is also the window where a corrective statement or a private medical opinion from your own doctor does the most good — before the rater has locked in a decision, not after. Once the evidence gathering step closes, the file goes to a rating specialist, and your chance to shape the record cheaply and quickly closes with it.

Rating specialist applying the rating schedule to a file and producing the decision letter
05

Rating decision and promulgation

Typically several weeks after the last piece of evidence lands

This is the stage where your evidence finally becomes a number. A rating specialist — not the examiner, and not a doctor — takes everything in the file and applies the rating schedule to it: the exam findings, your range-of-motion measurements, your lay statements, your private records and any medical opinions. They assign a diagnostic code to each condition, pull a percentage from the schedule, set your effective date, and either grant, deny or defer each issue. The decision is then reviewed and authorized — promulgation is simply the VA’s word for making it official — and the decision letter and code sheet are generated and mailed. Where an award is made, payment follows the effective date rules, and back pay is calculated to that date.

Read the code sheet, not just the percentage. It names the diagnostic code used, the exact measurements relied on and the effective date assigned — and that is where most mistakes live. This is a human being reading a file under a production quota, and the two things that go wrong most often are a rater using the pre-repetition range-of-motion numbers instead of the worst-case figures §4.59 and §4.40 require, and a claimed condition being decided on a thin record or quietly left out. Check whether painful motion was accounted for, whether your radiculopathy was rated separately under Note (1) or folded into the spine rating, and whether every condition you claimed was actually addressed. A decision you do not read is a decision you cannot challenge — and the deadline to challenge it starts the day the letter is dated, not the day you understand it.

Opened rating decision letter with a magnifying glass over the reasons for decision section
06

C&P examination is the decision letter

The day it lands in your mailbox

The envelope holds two different documents: the narrative decision letter, and the code sheet. Together they are the single most important piece of paper in your claim, because every deadline, every appeal option and every dollar of back pay is set by what is printed on them — not by what you were told at the exam.

Most veterans read one thing on that letter: the percentage. Then they either celebrate it or get angry at it, and file it in a drawer. That is the mistake. The percentage is the conclusion; the reasons section is the reasoning, and the reasoning is what you attack. It tells you which diagnostic code the rater used, which range-of-motion figures they relied on and which they ignored, whether painful motion under §4.59 was accounted for, whether your neurological findings were rated separately under Note (1) or folded into the spine rating, which conditions were decided, which were deferred, and which were never addressed at all. It also assigns your effective date, which controls back pay. A rating that looks low is very often not a disagreement about how bad your neck is — it is a rater who used the pre-repetition numbers, or missed the radiculopathy, or rated one side and not both. You cannot see any of that from the percentage. Do not go by the percentage alone, and do not decode it by yourself if you are not sure what you are looking at — have someone who reads these for a living read it with you before the clock runs out. You have one year from the date on that letter to file a Higher-Level Review (VA Form 20-0996), a Supplemental Claim (VA Form 20-0995) or a Board appeal, and the deadline runs from the date printed on the letter, not the date you opened it. Bring it to this office and we will go through it line by line, at no cost, and tell you plainly whether it is right.

What normal looks like: 30 to 60 days for a simple claim, longer for a complex one

After your exam you should expect some kind of notification from the VA — a decision, a request for more information, or a notice that another exam has been scheduled. For a straightforward, single-issue claim that often lands within 30 to 60 days. But 30 to 60 days is a rough guide, not a rule, and it is not a ceiling. A claim with several conditions, a toxic-exposure or presumptive question, a returned exam, or missing records routinely takes 90 days or more, and that alone does not mean anything is wrong — the more moving parts your case has, the longer the VA takes to work it. Inside the window that is normal for a case like yours, silence is expected and there is nothing to fix, and a tracker that jumps backward is normal too.

What matters is not a fixed number of days — it is whether the claim is still moving and whether you can get a straight answer about where it is. Once you are well past what is normal for a case like yours and the VA either goes silent or cannot tell you what the claim is waiting on, stop waiting. That is usually where the real trouble hides — an exam that came back twice, a records request that was never answered, a claimed condition that got dropped, or a file sitting in the wrong queue. Call the VA at 800-827-1000, ask specifically what the claim is waiting on and who it is assigned to, and write down the answer. If you cannot get a straight answer, or the answer tells you the exam is the problem, that is the moment to bring it to this office rather than sitting on it for another three months. Problems raised early get fixed inside the claim. Problems discovered in a denial letter get fixed on appeal, and that costs you a year.

Other things that control the clock

Six things decide how long you wait, and none of them are visible from the tracker alone.

VA claim status page on a monitor showing an average days to complete figure with a trend line that changes month to month
01

The average is a moving number

Check it at the source, not second-hand

The VA publishes an average days-to-complete figure for disability claims that moves month to month; check the current number on the VA’s own claim status page rather than relying on any second-hand figure. In practice, most veterans see a decision somewhere between roughly three and eight months from the date the claim was filed, with the exam usually falling in the middle of that window.

Process pipeline showing the exam marked complete at the start followed by evidence gathering, rating decision and authorization still ahead
02

The exam is not the last step

Three stages still sit in front of you

The exam is not the last step. The clock does not start at the exam and it does not stop there either — the claim still has to clear evidence gathering, the rating decision and authorization.

Exam report stamped returned for clarification beside a claim tracker whose progress bar is moving backward
03

A returned exam is the invisible delay

The reason a tracker slides backward

A returned or clarified exam is the most common invisible delay, and it is why a tracker can slide backward. Expect some contact from the VA within 30 to 60 days of the exam. Past 60 days with nothing at all, call and ask specifically what the claim is waiting on.

Calendar with days 30 through 60 shaded as the normal window and everything past day 60 shaded red beside the VA benefits phone number
04

30 to 60 days is a guide, not a deadline

A complex case can take 90 days or more

Thirty to sixty days is a rough average for a simple, single-issue claim — not a hard rule and not a ceiling. A claim with several conditions, a presumptive or toxic-exposure question, a returned exam, or missing records can easily take 90 days or more, and that alone does not mean anything is wrong. Watch whether the claim is still moving, not the calendar. Only when it stalls well past what is normal for a case like yours, and no one can tell you what it is waiting on, should you stop waiting — call 800-827-1000 and ask what the claim is waiting on and who it is assigned to.

Three ways to track a claim shown side by side: the VA.gov claim status page, the VA Health and Benefits mobile app, and the benefits telephone line
05

Watch your status yourself — in one of three places

Weekly, not daily

Check your own status in one of three places: your VA.gov claim status page, the VA Health and Benefits mobile app, or by calling 800-827-1000. Check it weekly, not daily. And understand exactly what a status check can tell you: if a decision is posted in your account, it is live; if it is not posted, it is not ready. That is the whole rule. This is not something your representative or your attorney can speed up — we see the same thing you see, at the same time, and calling us to ask does not move it. Calling the VA to ask for an update does not move it either. Watch it yourself, weekly, and the moment a decision posts, bring it to us.

Flat infographic of a VA rating decision letter held beside a calendar stamped ONE YEAR TO APPEAL, with the three appeal lanes — Higher-Level Review, Supplemental Claim and Board Appeal — labeled below
06

Your decision letter arrives — read it, then start the appeal clock

What to do the day it lands in your mailbox

The decision letter is the finish line of the claim and the starting line of the appeal — and the moment it arrives, a one-year clock starts running. Read it the same day. Find the combined rating, the percentage assigned to each condition, and the effective date, because the effective date controls how far back your back pay reaches. Then request a copy of your C&P exam report so you can see whether the rater used your real range-of-motion numbers or ignored the radiculopathy. If any part of the decision is wrong — a low rating, a denied condition, or a bad effective date — you have three appeal lanes, and you must choose one within one year of the date printed on the letter: a **Higher-Level Review (VA Form 20-0996)**, where a senior reviewer re-decides on the same evidence; a **Supplemental Claim (VA Form 20-0995)**, when you have new and relevant evidence such as a private DBQ or your own range-of-motion exam; or a **Board Appeal (VA Form 10182)** to a Veterans Law Judge. Miss that one-year deadline and the decision becomes final. You can still file again later, but you lose the original effective date — and that lost time is lost back pay you never get back. Bring the letter to this office before the year runs out and we will read it with you, line by line, at no cost.

07Remedy

How to report a bad exam

Where this exam goes wrong

The most common failure is an examiner who writes "no opinion can be provided without resort to mere speculation." That phrase is a red flag under **38 CFR §4.2**. Tinnitus is inherently subjective — it cannot be measured — and the veteran's lay testimony is competent evidence. An examiner who dismisses the claim because there is no objective test for tinnitus has misapplied the standard. If the nexus opinion is negative solely because the examiner could not measure the tinnitus with a machine, that exam is inadequate and should be challenged.

Flat infographic of a hand writing exam notes on a notepad inside a car with a clock recording the time
01

Write it down the moment you get to your car

Date, start time, end time, the examiner’s name and credentials, the vendor, every test that was performed, and every test that was not. A contemporaneous note written the same day is evidence. A memory reconstructed four months later is not.

Flat infographic of a C&P exam report and a DBQ questionnaire being requested through VA.gov and by phone
02

Get the exam report and the questionnaire

Request a copy through VA.gov, through a written request to the Regional Office, or by calling 800-827-1000. You cannot challenge what you have not read. Compare it line by line against what actually happened in the room.

Flat infographic of a magnifying glass over a document with a defect circled in red and a regulation citation tag
03

Name the defect specifically, with the citation

Never write "the exam was unfair." Write "no goniometer was used, contrary to 38 CFR §4.46" or "flare-ups were reported and not addressed, contrary to Sharp v. Shulkin" or "repetitive use testing was not performed, contrary to 38 CFR §4.40 and DeLuca." A specific, citable defect is what forces action.

Flat infographic of VA Form 21-4138 Statement in Support of Claim being submitted with an upload arrow
04

Submit a statement asking for a new examination

VA Form 21-4138, Statement in Support of Claim, filed through VA.gov or mailed to the Evidence Intake Center. State the defect, cite the authority, and request a new or supplemental examination. Do this BEFORE the decision if the claim is still open — it is far easier than undoing a decision afterward.

Flat infographic of two separate tracks, one labeled Patient Advocate for conduct and one labeled Exam Adequacy
05

Report examiner conduct separately

If the problem is behavior rather than methodology — you were rushed out, dismissed, never touched, or treated with hostility — file a complaint with the VA facility’s Patient Advocate, or with the vendor directly for a contract exam, and copy the Regional Office. Conduct complaints and adequacy challenges are two different tracks and you can run both.

Flat infographic of a signpost forking between Higher-Level Review 20-0996 and Supplemental Claim 20-0995
06

If a decision has already issued, pick the right lane

A Higher-Level Review (VA Form 20-0996) argues the VA erred on the evidence it had — the right vehicle when the exam was inadequate on its face. A Supplemental Claim (VA Form 20-0995) is the vehicle when you are adding new and relevant evidence, such as your own private range-of-motion examination or a completed DBQ from your treating provider.

Flat infographic of a goniometer measuring a joint angle beside a completed DBQ showing range-of-motion degrees
07

Put your own measurements on the table

A private examination with full goniometric measurements, or a DBQ completed by your own provider, creates a conflict in the evidence that the VA has to resolve — and under 38 CFR §3.102 reasonable doubt is resolved in your favor.

End of clinical section

Tinnitus — DC 6260

See It Before You Sit In The Room

How to File a VA Claim for Tinnitus — Step by Step

Combat Craig

Tinnitus Explained — What Happens Inside the Ear

Fauquier ENT

The Questions Veterans Actually Ask

Tinnitus Claims — Frequently Asked Questions

Straight answers to the questions that decide tinnitus claims — the ratings, the separate evaluations, and the exam mistakes that cost veterans money.

Tinnitus is evaluated under DC 6260. The scale runs across 2 rating levels, and the highest is 10%, which the VA assigns for: recurrent tinnitus. Where your evaluation actually lands depends on how your exam and records document those criteria — not on how bad the condition feels on an average day.

Every condition in Tinnitus & Hearing Loss

Open A Channel

Three Ways to Put an Accredited Agent on Your Case

No fee unless you win. An accredited agent #45147 personally reviews every request — we respond within 48 hours.