You served. The VA owes you a debt it does not volunteer to pay. Everything here is free. When you need an accredited agent in your corner, we are right here.

Crisis Line: 988702-992-4883
The VA DisabilityADVOCATE

What The VA Won’t Put In Writing

Declassified

Description

We decode the evidence rules, exam traps, and rating tricks the VA won’t spell out, then fight to win what you earned.

Notes

Information here is free. Optional accredited representation, no fees unless you win.

VA-ACCREDITED CLAIMS AGENT #45147DENIALS REOPENEDLOW RATINGS CHALLENGEDC&P EXAMS AUDITEDEFFECTIVE-DATE & CUE HUNTSTDIU · SMC · PACT ACTNO WIN, NO FEE ON 20% OR 30% REPRESENTATION · $750 FLAT MISSION 5 BRIEFGOVERNED BY 38 CFR §14.636SECONDARY CONDITIONS LINKEDTERA & TOXIC-EXPOSURE CLAIMSBOARD & HIGHER-LEVEL APPEALSFREE CASE REVIEW, ASK A QUESTIONVA-ACCREDITED CLAIMS AGENT #45147DENIALS REOPENEDLOW RATINGS CHALLENGEDC&P EXAMS AUDITEDEFFECTIVE-DATE & CUE HUNTSTDIU · SMC · PACT ACTNO WIN, NO FEE ON 20% OR 30% REPRESENTATION · $750 FLAT MISSION 5 BRIEFGOVERNED BY 38 CFR §14.636SECONDARY CONDITIONS LINKEDTERA & TOXIC-EXPOSURE CLAIMSBOARD & HIGHER-LEVEL APPEALSFREE CASE REVIEW, ASK A QUESTION
A male military veteran in his fifties seated at home pressing one hand to his upper chest with a look of discomfort from acid reflux, an American flag softly out of focus behind him
GERD & GI Conditions, all conditions
DC 7206 · #45147

GERD (Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease)

Acid backing up from the stomach into the esophagus, burning, regurgitation and chest pain that reflux medication only partly controls.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is one of the most commonly claimed, and most commonly under-rated, conditions among veterans, and the rules changed on May 19, 2024. Before that date GERD was rated by analogy to DC 7346 (Hiatal Hernia); the new DC 7206 rates it primarily on esophageal strictures confirmed by endoscopy. If your claim was filed or pending before that date, the VA must evaluate you under both codes and give you the higher rating. GERD is not a PACT Act presumptive, but it is one of the most commonly granted secondary claims: to service-connected PTSD and to the NSAIDs taken for a service-connected orthopedic condition. Because the new code rewards structure over symptoms, diagnostic testing is everything.

The Law That Governs This38 CFR §3.303, Direct Service Connection38 CFR §3.310, Secondary Service Connection38 CFR §4.3, Reasonable DoubtDC 7206, Diagnostic Code

The Diagnostic Codes

Conditions Rated In GERD & GI Conditions

These are the codes the VA will actually stamp on a decision in this group. The code you are granted under decides which formula is used, and that decides your percentage. GERD (DC 7206) is highlighted below.

Before Anything Gets Rated

What The VA Is Actually Looking For, And What Service Connection Really Means

Before the VA ever opens the rating schedule, it asks one question: is this disability the government’s responsibility? That is what “service connection” means. It is not a diagnosis, it is not sympathy, and it is not a reward for having served. It is a legal finding that a current, diagnosed disability is linked to something that happened to you in uniform. Percentages come later. If service connection is not established, there is nothing to rate and the claim is denied, no matter how bad the gerd (dc 7206) is.

Service connection for GERD (Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease): the link between your service record and a current diagnosis

For GERD (DC 7206) Specifically

For GERD the rater is hunting for objective proof the disease is more than heartburn: an endoscopy or upper-GI report naming reflux, esophagitis, stricture or a hiatal hernia, plus the symptom pattern that actually drives the rating under DC 7206, regurgitation, substernal pain, trouble swallowing, and any weight loss or anemia. Because GERD is so often secondary to PTSD medications, NSAIDs taken for a service-connected joint, or a service-connected respiratory condition, the VA also wants a clear line from the primary condition to the reflux under §3.310. Bring the scope results and a symptom log, a claim resting on 'I take an antacid' gets rated at the floor.

The three elements the VA must find. All three. Every time.

These come out of Caluza v. Brown and Shedden v. Principi, and they are the checklist a rating officer works through on your file. Miss one and the claim fails on that element alone.

1

A current, diagnosed disability

A doctor has to have written a diagnosis in a medical record, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) with esophageal erosion, GERD with confirmed esophageal stricture on endoscopy, or GERD with chronic dysphagia and documented mucosal damage. Symptoms by themselves are not a disability the VA can rate. Saunders v. Wilkie held that pain causing functional impairment can be a disability, but you still need a clinician to document it as diagnosed and impairing. The diagnosis must exist now, during the claim period, not only years ago.

2

An in-service event, injury, illness or aggravation

Something in service had to have happened, an injury, an exposure, a documented sick call, or steady wear over a career. It does not have to be one dramatic moment and it does not have to be spelled out in your service treatment records: buddy statements, unit records, performance evaluations and your own competent lay testimony can establish it.

3

A medical nexus linking the two

A qualified medical opinion that says the current diagnosis is at least as likely as not related to the in-service event. That phrase matters: at least as likely as not means 50 percent or better. Under 38 C.F.R. §3.102, when the evidence is evenly balanced, the benefit of the doubt goes to you and the claim must be granted.

The five ways service connection is established

Most veterans only know the first one. The other routes are lower-effort paths to the same grant, and the secondary route is the one most often left on the table.

Direct, 38 C.F.R. §3.303(a)

The injury or disease began in service and never went away. The classic route: three elements, one nexus opinion.

Chronicity and continuity, §3.303(b)

A chronic condition shown in service, plus continuity of the same symptoms from separation to now, can establish the link without a formal nexus opinion. Your own testimony about symptoms you can observe is competent evidence.

Presumptive, §3.307 and §3.309

Certain chronic diseases are presumed service connected if they manifest to a compensable degree within a set window after separation. You do not have to prove causation at all.

Secondary, §3.310(a) and (b)

A disability proximately due to, or aggravated by, an already service-connected condition is itself service connected. This is how GERD caused or aggravated by service-connected PTSD, GERD caused by NSAIDs or steroids prescribed for a service-connected orthopedic condition, Barrett's esophagus secondary to service-connected GERD, or dental erosion and chronic laryngitis secondary to service-connected GERD get on the rating sheet.

Aggravation of a pre-service condition, §3.306

If you entered service with a condition and service made it permanently worse, the increase is compensable. The VA must rebut the presumption of soundness by clear and unmistakable evidence, a bar it frequently fails to meet.

VA medical care, 38 U.S.C. §1151

An additional disability caused by VA treatment, surgery, or a failure to diagnose is compensated as if it were service connected.

The bottom line, there is no way around this

No diagnosis, no rating. It has to be chronic. It has to cause impairment.

Without a diagnosis, the VA will not rate your claim.

The VA will not rate GERD under DC 7206 without a formal diagnosis of GERD documented by a licensed clinician, a complaint of heartburn in a sick-call note or a prescription for a proton pump inhibitor alone will not cut it. Veterans lose this element constantly because their service treatment records show symptoms but no physician ever wrote 'GERD' or 'gastroesophageal reflux disease' as a diagnosis. Get a current diagnosis from a gastroenterologist that uses the actual diagnostic term and references objective findings before you file.

The condition must be chronic.

GERD must be shown as a chronic, recurring condition, not an isolated episode that resolved. Raters look for a documented history of ongoing symptoms, repeated treatment, and continuity of care spanning months or years, because a one-time notation does not establish a disability under 38 CFR §4.1. If your records show a gap in treatment, the VA will argue the condition resolved; keep your treatment current and documented even if you are managing it with over-the-counter medication.

It must cause actual impairment.

Under DC 7206, impairment is measured primarily by structural findings, specifically the degree of esophageal stricture on endoscopy, which means veterans with severe daily symptoms but no endoscopy on record are routinely rated 0% despite real functional loss. A 0% rating means service connection is established but no compensation is paid, and it also blocks secondary claims from flowing off that condition at their full value. To avoid this trap, you need endoscopy results in your file and a physician statement that explicitly ties your functional limitations, weight loss, dysphagia, sleep disruption, to the GERD diagnosis.

What this means for you before you file: Before you file, get a current endoscopy and a private nexus letter that connects your GERD to your service-connected condition or in-service event, those two documents are the difference between a compensable rating and a denial. Under Gilbert v. Derwinski, when your documented flare frequency falls between two rating thresholds and the evidence is in approximate balance, the VA must resolve doubt in your favor and assign the higher rating.

The Percentages

Rating Schedule, GERD & Hiatal Hernia, DC 7346 / DC 7206

Veterans must understand that two rating schedules now exist for GERD. Claims filed or pending before May 19, 2024 are evaluated under BOTH and assigned the higher rating. Claims filed on or after that date use only DC 7206. The old DC 7346 criteria are symptom-based and consider the ameliorative-medication doctrine (your condition is rated as if you were not taking medication). The new DC 7206 criteria are stricture-based and focus on objective structural findings and the interventions required. Under 38 C.F.R. §4.114, GERD and hiatal hernia are considered coexisting digestive conditions that cannot be rated separately, the VA assigns a single evaluation reflecting the predominant disability picture. The DBQ form is the Esophageal Conditions DBQ.

Black male veteran in his 50s being examined by a white female gastroenterologist pressing on his abdomen in a clinical examination room

60% (DC 7346) / 80% (DC 7206)

DC 7346: Symptoms of pain, vomiting, material weight loss, and hematemesis or melena with moderate anemia; or other symptom combinations productive of severe impairment of health. DC 7206: Recurrent or refractory esophageal strictures causing dysphagia with aspiration, undernutrition, or substantial weight loss (over 20% of baseline), requiring surgical correction or a feeding tube (PEG tube).

30% (DC 7346) / 50% (DC 7206)

DC 7346: Persistently recurrent epigastric distress with dysphagia, pyrosis, and regurgitation, accompanied by substernal, arm, or shoulder pain, productive of considerable impairment of health. DC 7206: Recurrent or refractory esophageal strictures causing dysphagia requiring dilation three or more times per year, steroid-assisted dilation at least once per year, or esophageal stent placement.

10% (DC 7346) / 30% (DC 7206)

DC 7346: Two or more of the symptoms described under the 30% criteria (dysphagia, pyrosis, regurgitation, substernal pain) of less severity. DC 7206: Recurrent esophageal strictures causing dysphagia requiring dilation no more than twice per year.

10% (DC 7206)

DC 7206: Documented history of esophageal stricture requiring daily medication to control dysphagia; or daily medication required to control GERD symptoms even without imaging-confirmed stricture.

0% (DC 7206)

DC 7206: Documented diagnosis of GERD without daily symptoms or requirement for daily medication. Service-connected but noncompensable, still anchors secondary claims.

Service Connection

Advice from the Advocate

This is where I stop explaining the rules and tell you how I would build your GERD (DC 7206) claim if you were sitting across my desk. Read the causation notes below twice. The VA will not connect the dots for you, even though 38 CFR 3.159 says it has a duty to assist. Your job is to put the in-service event, the current diagnosis and the medical link on paper, then make the examiner deal with all three.

Three-dimensional medical illustration showing a cross-section of the lower esophagus and stomach with a hiatal hernia and acid reflux flowing upward through the diaphragm against a black background
GERD develops when the lower esophageal sphincter, the muscular ring at the junction of the esophagus and stomach, weakens or relaxes inappropriately, allowing stomach acid to flow backward (reflux) into the esophagus. In a hiatal hernia, the upper portion of the stomach pushes upward through the diaphragmatic hiatus into the chest cavity, further compromising the sphincter and promoting reflux. Chronic acid exposure damages the esophageal lining, causing inflammation (esophagitis), erosion, and, over time, the formation of esophageal strictures (scar-tissue narrowing) that make swallowing difficult. For veterans, the pathway to service connection most commonly runs through secondary linkage: service-connected PTSD and anxiety produce chronic stress that increases acid production and disrupts sphincter function, while NSAIDs and psychotropic medications prescribed for other service-connected conditions directly damage the gastrointestinal lining. GERD is also a recognized secondary condition to sleep apnea and respiratory disorders, and it is a gateway to Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal complications.

The advocate's notes on causation, GERD (DC 7206)

The separate arguments that decide this code: where the VA will attack, the regulation that answers it, and the evidence that closes the gap.

  1. 1Secondary to PTSD, anxiety, or depression, §3.310(a)

    This is the most commonly granted nexus pathway for GERD. Chronic psychological stress from service-connected mental health conditions increases gastric acid production, impairs lower esophageal sphincter relaxation, and disrupts the autonomic regulation of the gastrointestinal system. Additionally, the medications prescribed for these conditions, SSRIs, benzodiazepines, and other psychotropic drugs, are well-documented causes of GERD. The nexus letter should explain both pathways: the direct physiological effect of chronic stress on the GI tract, and the medication side-effect mechanism.

  2. 2Secondary to NSAID or opioid use for service-connected pain, §3.310(a)

    Long-term use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids prescribed for service-connected musculoskeletal conditions erodes the gastric and esophageal mucosa and promotes reflux. The nexus letter should document the duration and dosage of NSAID or opioid use, the prescribing relationship to the service-connected condition, and the medical literature establishing the causal link.

  3. 3Direct service connection, in-service onset

    Veterans with documented in-service complaints of heartburn, acid reflux, or prescriptions for antacids or proton pump inhibitors in their service treatment records can establish direct service connection. The key is continuity, showing that the in-service symptoms continued or worsened after discharge. Pull your complete pharmacy and treatment records from active duty.

  4. 4Aggravation by service-connected conditions, §3.310(b)

    If GERD pre-existed service or developed independently, a service-connected condition (particularly PTSD, chronic pain requiring NSAIDs, or sleep apnea) may have permanently worsened it beyond its natural progression. The nexus letter must establish a measurable baseline of the GERD before the aggravation began and document the permanent worsening attributable to the service-connected condition.

Exposure & Aggravation

How GERD (DC 7206) Happens In Service, And How It Gets Worse

Smoke rising from a burn pit on a deployed base

The VA wants an in-service event, and most veterans think that means one dramatic injury. It does not. Years of duty that wore the body down count too, and under 38 CFR 3.306 a condition service made worse can still be connected. Find yourself in the list below, then put that duty in writing with dates, units and names. The board only weighs what you put on paper.

How veterans pick this up in uniform, GERD (DC 7206)

GERD (DC 7206) rarely announces itself with one dramatic moment. It is built by what service asked of your body over months and years, and once it is service-connected, it is compensated for how it keeps getting worse, not for how it started. Below is how veterans pick this up in uniform, and who is most prone to it.

  • Service-connected PTSD, anxiety, or depression, chronic psychological stress increases gastric acid production, impairs lower esophageal sphincter function, and the medications prescribed for these conditions (SSRIs, benzodiazepines) commonly cause or worsen reflux
  • Long-term NSAID use for service-connected musculoskeletal conditions, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs prescribed for chronic pain erode the gastric and esophageal lining, directly causing or aggravating GERD
  • Military dietary conditions, irregular meal schedules, MRE-heavy field diets, high-caffeine consumption, and eating under stress during deployments contribute to the development of chronic acid reflux
  • Veterans service-connected for sleep apnea, the cyclical relationship between nocturnal reflux and obstructive sleep apnea, where each condition worsens the other
  • Veterans who underwent in-service abdominal or thoracic surgery, or sustained blast or blunt-force abdominal trauma, disruption of the diaphragmatic hiatus can cause a hiatal hernia
  • Veterans service-connected for respiratory conditions (asthma, COPD), chronic coughing and pressure changes in the chest and abdomen promote reflux

Who is most prone to it

Veterans service-connected for PTSD, anxiety, or depression (the most common secondary pathway, chronic stress plus psychotropic medications); veterans taking long-term NSAIDs or opioids for service-connected musculoskeletal pain; veterans with service-connected sleep apnea (cyclical nocturnal reflux); veterans who sustained in-service abdominal or thoracic trauma or surgery; veterans with service-connected respiratory conditions (asthma, COPD); and veterans who developed chronic acid reflux during deployments with poor dietary conditions and high operational stress.

The Symptoms

What GERD (DC 7206) Actually Feels Like

Read this list the way the examiner will. Every symptom you live with but never report is a symptom the VA treats as if it does not exist. The rating schedule pays for how GERD (DC 7206) affects your daily life and your work, so the details matter. Check off what matches your day, tell your doctor in those words, and make sure it lands in your treatment record before the exam.

A veteran in his 50s sitting alone in a dim room, staring ahead
  • Chronic heartburn (pyrosis), a persistent burning sensation rising from the upper abdomen into the chest and throat, often worse after meals or when lying down
  • Regurgitation, acid or partially digested food flowing back up into the throat or mouth without vomiting, leaving a sour or bitter taste
  • Difficulty swallowing (dysphagia), a feeling of food getting stuck or passing slowly through the esophagus, which may indicate stricture formation
  • Substernal, arm, or shoulder pain, chest pain that mimics cardiac symptoms, caused by acid irritating the esophageal lining and surrounding nerves
  • Chronic nausea and epigastric distress, persistent upper abdominal discomfort, bloating, and a feeling of fullness that interferes with eating and daily life
  • Hematemesis or melena, vomiting blood or passing dark, tarry stools, indicating erosion of the esophageal or gastric lining from chronic acid exposure
  • Sleep disruption, nighttime reflux episodes that cause coughing, choking, and repeated waking, contributing to fatigue and impaired daytime function
  • Material weight loss, unintentional loss of body weight due to the inability to eat comfortably, food avoidance, or malabsorption from chronic esophageal damage

How this one is rated

GERD and hiatal hernia are rated under 38 CFR §4.114. For claims filed before May 19, 2024, the VA evaluates under both the old DC 7346 (Hiatal Hernia) criteria and the new DC 7206 (GERD) criteria and assigns whichever is higher. For claims filed on or after that date, DC 7206 controls. Under the old DC 7346: 60% for pain, vomiting, material weight loss, and hematemesis or melena with moderate anemia, or other symptom combinations productive of severe impairment of health; 30% for persistently recurrent epigastric distress with dysphagia, pyrosis, and regurgitation accompanied by substernal, arm, or shoulder pain productive of considerable impairment of health; and 10% for two or more of those 30% symptoms at lesser severity. Under the new DC 7206: 80% for recurrent or refractory esophageal strictures causing dysphagia with aspiration, undernutrition, or substantial weight loss (over 20% of baseline), requiring surgical correction or a feeding tube; 50% for recurrent or refractory strictures requiring dilation three or more times per year, steroid-assisted dilation, or stent placement; 30% for recurrent strictures causing dysphagia requiring dilation up to twice per year; 10% for documented stricture requiring daily medication to control dysphagia, or daily medication to control GERD symptoms; and 0% for a documented diagnosis without daily symptoms or daily medication.

What you are measured against

The rating is measured against objective diagnostic findings, which is why testing matters more for GERD than for almost any other condition. Under the new DC 7206, the rating turns on the presence and severity of esophageal strictures documented by upper endoscopy (EGD) or barium swallow. Strictures are structural narrowing of the esophagus caused by chronic acid damage, and their management, dilation procedures, stent placement, surgery, drives the rating from 10% to 80%. Under the old DC 7346, the rating turns on symptom severity and health impact: the examiner documents dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), pyrosis (heartburn), regurgitation, substernal pain, vomiting, hematemesis (vomiting blood), melena (dark tarry stool), weight loss, and anemia, then the rater assesses whether the overall picture amounts to “considerable” or “severe” impairment of health. Under both codes, an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is the gold-standard diagnostic: it visualizes the esophageal lining, confirms inflammation (esophagitis), documents strictures, and can biopsy for Barrett’s esophagus. A barium swallow shows the hiatal hernia and reflux on imaging. Esophageal pH monitoring measures the actual acid exposure over 24 hours. Without these tests, you are arguing symptoms with no objective proof, and the new code barely rewards symptoms at all.

Each One On Its Own Page

Secondary Conditions, Aggravated or Caused by a Current Service-Connected Condition

Under 38 CFR §3.310(a), a disability that is proximately due to a service-connected condition is service-connected in its own right, and under §3.310(b), so is any additional disability caused when a service-connected condition aggravates a problem you already had. Each condition below is a separate evaluation with its own diagnostic code and its own percentage. They do not fold into the gerd (dc 7206) rating, they stack on top of it. A veteran who claims only the primary condition leaves these ratings on the table.

A Black male veteran in his 60s seated beside a gastroenterologist pointing at endoscopy images on a wall monitor in a dark clinical consultation room

Barrett’s Esophagus, the precancerous consequence

Years of acid washing over the lower esophagus can transform its lining into intestinal-type tissue, Barrett’s esophagus, a recognized precancerous change found on biopsy during an EGD. Once a veteran with service-connected GERD is diagnosed with Barrett’s, it is service-connected in its own right under §3.310(a) and requires lifelong surveillance endoscopy. It is the single most important reason to push for a scope: catching Barrett’s early is what stands between reflux and esophageal cancer.

An East Asian male veteran in his 50s at a dining table setting down his fork with one hand at the base of his throat, unable to swallow

Esophageal Stricture & Chronic Dysphagia, DC 7203 / 7206

Chronic acid damage scars the esophagus into a narrowed stricture, and swallowing becomes a daily struggle, food catches, meals stop, and repeated dilation procedures are needed to keep the esophagus open. Stricture with dysphagia is separately ratable under DC 7203/7206 and is the exact structural finding the post-2024 rules reward, driving evaluations from 10% all the way to 80%. Every dilation, stent, and swallowing study belongs in the record.

A Hispanic male veteran in his 60s in a quiet oncology consultation room with hands clasped, listening gravely to an out-of-focus physician

Esophageal Cancer (Adenocarcinoma), DC 7343

The gravest downstream path of untreated GERD and Barrett’s is esophageal adenocarcinoma. Rated under DC 7343, an active malignancy carries a 100% evaluation during treatment and for the mandated period afterward, with a mandatory re-examination before any reduction. A veteran whose GERD was service-connected and progressed to esophageal cancer has a direct secondary path under §3.310, this is why the reflux claim matters long before anyone is thinking about cancer.

A white male veteran in his 40s in a dim room with one hand at his throat and mouth slightly open as if his voice is failing

Chronic Laryngitis & Hoarseness (LPR), DC 6516

When reflux rises past the esophagus into the throat and voice box, laryngopharyngeal reflux, it inflames the larynx and produces chronic hoarseness, throat clearing, a lump-in-the-throat sensation, and a rough or failing voice. Chronic laryngitis is separately ratable under DC 6516, and its impact on any job that requires speaking is real. If your voice has changed since your reflux started, it belongs in the claim.

A Black female veteran in her 40s in a dental exam chair while an out-of-focus dentist examines her teeth in a dark clinical setting

Dental Erosion from Stomach Acid, §4.150

Acid that reaches the mouth at night dissolves tooth enamel from the inside out, producing dental erosion the dentist can see and document. Dental damage caused by a service-connected medical condition like GERD is compensable and treatable under §4.150 / §17.161. Ask your dentist to note that the erosion pattern is consistent with acid reflux rather than ordinary wear, that single sentence is the nexus.

A Middle Eastern male veteran in his 50s sitting up on the edge of a bed at night coughing into his fist in dark moody lighting

Aspiration, Chronic Cough & Respiratory Aggravation

Nighttime reflux that is breathed into the airway causes chronic cough, recurrent aspiration, and worsening of asthma or COPD, a well-documented cycle in which GERD and lung disease each make the other worse. A service-connected respiratory condition aggravated by GERD is ratable under §3.310(b), and repeated aspiration can lead to its own pneumonia claims. Document the night cough, the choking episodes, and any pulmonary flare that tracks with your reflux.

Accredited Claims Agent #45147

Ready To Get This Rated Correctly?

You have read how the VA rates GERD (DC 7206). Now the question is whether your file proves it. We represent veterans on a No Win, No Fee basis: 20% Direct-Pay paid by the VA from back pay, or 30% High-Complexity, and you owe nothing for representation if your rating does not increase. If you only need the roadmap, the Mission 5 Brief is a separate $750 flat fee. You bring the records, we build the argument.

GERD & GI Conditions, In Detail

GERD & GI Conditions, Service Connection In Depth

Here is each claimable condition in this group on its own terms, what it is, what service did to it, and what the VA requires before it will connect it.

Distinguished East African male VA-accredited disability advocate in his late forties with close-cropped hair wearing a navy blazer in a professional office portrait
DC 7206

GERD (Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease)

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is one of the most commonly claimed, and most commonly under-rated, conditions among veterans, and the rules changed on May 19, 2024. Before that date GERD was rated by analogy to DC 7346 (Hiatal Hernia); the new DC 7206 rates it primarily on esophageal strictures confirmed by endoscopy. If your claim was filed or pending before that date, the VA must evaluate you under both codes and give you the higher rating. GERD is not a PACT Act presumptive, but it is one of the most commonly granted secondary claims: to service-connected PTSD and to the NSAIDs taken for a service-connected orthopedic condition. Because the new code rewards structure over symptoms, diagnostic testing is everything.

You are reading this page now

A white female military veteran in her late fifties standing in a dim kitchen at night with one hand pressed to her upper abdomen from hiatal hernia discomfort, an American flag softly out of focus behind her
DC 7346

Hiatal Hernia

A hiatal hernia is a structural problem: the upper part of the stomach pushes upward through the diaphragmatic hiatus, the opening the esophagus normally passes through, into the chest cavity. That displacement weakens the lower esophageal sphincter and is one of the most common anatomical drivers of chronic acid reflux. The VA rates hiatal hernia by analogy to DC 7346, on a symptom-based scale, and under 38 CFR §4.114 it cannot be rated separately from GERD, the two are treated as coexisting digestive conditions and receive a single combined evaluation for the predominant disability picture. The rules changed on May 19, 2024: claims filed or pending before that date must also be measured under the newer DC 7206 stricture-based GERD criteria, with the VA assigning whichever result is higher. The two things that decide these claims are a diagnostic study that actually documents the hernia and a symptom record that captures your worst flares, not a snapshot of a good day.

Read the full Hiatal Hernia (DC 7346) page

The C&P Exam

What To Expect At The GERD (DC 7206) Exam

This is the encounter your rating is built on. The examiner has a checklist and a limited window, what follows is exactly what happens in that room, so none of it surprises you.

Clinical Section, What To Expect at the Exam

What to Expect at Your GERD & Hiatal Hernia C&P Examination

DC 7346 / DC 7206, the new rules reward objective evidence over symptom descriptions

The GERD C&P examination is one of the most consequential exams in the VA system because the rating criteria changed dramatically in May 2024. Under the **old DC 7346**, the examiner documented your **symptoms**, heartburn, regurgitation, dysphagia, chest pain, vomiting, weight loss, and the rater assessed whether they produced “considerable” or “severe” health impairment. Under the **new DC 7206**, the examiner is looking for **esophageal strictures**, documented by endoscopy or imaging, and the medical interventions required to manage them (dilation, stent, surgery). If your claim was filed before May 19, 2024, the VA must apply both codes and give you the higher rating, so make sure the examiner records **everything** under both frameworks. The single biggest mistake veterans make is walking into this exam without objective diagnostic testing, an EGD, a barium swallow, or pH monitoring. Without these, the new code leaves you at 10% or 0%. Bring your complete diagnostic records, your medication list, your weight history, and a symptom diary that documents every flare, frequency, severity, duration, and impact on your daily life.

Condition

GERD (DC 7206), DC 7206

Governing questionnaire

Esophageal Conditions DBQ, stricture history, dilation procedures, symptom frequency and severity, diagnostic test results (EGD, barium swallow, pH monitoring), medication regimen, weight history, and functional impact

Click the form number to open the official questionnaire on VA.gov.

01In The Room

What happens during the exam

The tests and maneuvers for this condition

  • Upper endoscopy (esophagogastroduodenoscopy / EGD), a flexible scope passed through the mouth into the esophagus and stomach to directly visualize the esophageal lining, document inflammation, strictures, Barrett’s esophagus, and hiatal hernia
  • Barium swallow study, a series of X-ray images taken while the veteran swallows barium contrast, showing the shape and function of the esophagus, the hiatal hernia, reflux, and any strictures on imaging
  • Esophageal pH monitoring (24-hour), a thin catheter placed through the nose into the esophagus to measure acid exposure over 24 hours, providing objective data on the frequency and duration of reflux episodes
  • Abdominal physical examination, palpation of the epigastric region to document tenderness, guarding, and clinical signs consistent with chronic reflux disease and hiatal hernia
  • Blood work and nutritional labs, complete blood count (hemoglobin, hematocrit) to assess for anemia from chronic bleeding, and iron studies, albumin, and weight records to document nutritional impact

What gets measured, and to what number

Esophageal strictures, presence, recurrence, and treatment

The primary rating driver under DC 7206. The examiner documents whether strictures are present, whether they are recurrent or refractory, and the interventions required, daily medication, dilation procedures (how many per year), steroid-assisted dilation, stent placement, or surgical correction. This single finding drives the rating from 10% to 80%.

Dysphagia severity

Difficulty swallowing is the functional consequence of strictures. The examiner documents whether dysphagia is present, its severity, whether it requires medication to control, and whether it causes aspiration (food or liquid entering the airway). Aspiration is a marker for the highest rating tier.

Weight loss and nutritional status

Material weight loss is a criterion under DC 7346 (60%) and substantial weight loss (over 20% of baseline) under DC 7206 (80%). The examiner records your current weight, baseline weight, and whether undernutrition is present. Bring documentation of your weight history over the past several years.

Hematemesis, melena, and anemia

Vomiting blood (hematemesis) and dark tarry stools (melena) indicate erosion from chronic acid exposure and are criteria for the 60% tier under DC 7346. Moderate anemia from chronic blood loss supports the same tier. Bring any lab work showing hemoglobin and iron levels, and any ER records for GI bleeding.

Symptom frequency and impact on health

Under DC 7346, the rater assesses whether the symptom picture produces “considerable” (30%) or “severe” (60%) impairment of health. A detailed symptom diary documenting the frequency, duration, and functional impact of heartburn, regurgitation, pain, and nausea is the evidence that drives this subjective standard.

02Orientation

What to expect during this exam

What makes this exam different from every other C&P exam

1Two rating codes apply, know which one helps you more

If your claim was filed or pending before May 19, 2024, the VA is legally required to evaluate you under BOTH DC 7346 (the old symptom-based hiatal hernia criteria) and DC 7206 (the new stricture-based GERD criteria) and assign whichever rating is higher. Make sure your examiner documents both the symptom picture and the structural findings so the rater can compare. If you were already rated under DC 7346 and the new code would result in a lower rating, your existing rating is grandfathered.

2Objective testing is no longer optional, get an EGD

Under the new DC 7206, ratings above 10% require documented esophageal strictures. An upper endoscopy (EGD) is the gold standard for finding them. If you have never had an EGD, schedule one before your C&P exam. A barium swallow and esophageal pH monitoring provide additional objective evidence. Without these tests, the examiner has no structural findings to report and the new code caps you at 10% for daily medication.

3Medication history is worth 10%, document every prescription

Under DC 7206, daily medication to control GERD symptoms earns a 10% rating even without a documented stricture. Under DC 7346, the ameliorative medication doctrine means the VA must rate your condition as if you were NOT taking the medication, so your medicated state underestimates your true severity. Either way, a complete prescription history of every proton pump inhibitor, H2 blocker, and antacid you have taken is essential evidence. Bring the full list with dates.

See it before you sit in the room

03Preparation

Know your symptoms and secondary factors

What the report must actually say about gerd (dc 7206), dc 7206

  • Tell the examiner about every medication you take, proton pump inhibitors, H2 blockers, antacids, and how long you have been on them. Under DC 7206, daily medication alone supports 10%, and under DC 7346, the ameliorative doctrine means the VA must rate you as if you were not taking them.
  • Describe your swallowing difficulty (dysphagia) in detail, what foods you can no longer eat, how often food gets stuck, and whether you have ever choked or aspirated. Dysphagia is the bridge between symptom-level and stricture-level ratings.
  • Quantify your weight loss, your highest stable weight versus your current weight, the percentage of loss, and whether it was unintentional. Material weight loss is a criterion under both codes and directly affects the rating tier.
  • Report every episode of vomiting blood or passing dark tarry stools, hematemesis and melena are powerful objective markers that support the highest tiers under DC 7346 and indicate severe esophageal erosion.
  • Explain how GERD disrupts your sleep, the nighttime reflux episodes, the choking and coughing, the need to sleep propped up, and the daytime fatigue that results. Sleep disruption affects employability and supports TDIU.

Pain level, frequency, lost work and functional loss, how to say them

Latino male veteran in his 40s sitting up in bed at night pressing one hand to his chest with a pained expression from acid reflux heartburn

Describe your heartburn as persistent and recurrent, not occasional

The 30% tier under DC 7346 requires “persistently recurrent epigastric distress.” Occasional heartburn does not meet this threshold. Describing the frequency and persistence, daily, after every meal, waking you at night, matches the regulatory language.

If your heartburn occurs even while taking proton pump inhibitors, say so explicitly. Under DC 7346, the ameliorative-medication doctrine means the VA must rate you as if the medication were not masking your symptoms.

"I have burning in my chest and throat after every meal, and it wakes me up most nights. Even with the omeprazole my doctor prescribed, the heartburn breaks through. Without the medication, I could not function at all."

Asian female veteran in her 50s in a kitchen leaning over the sink with one hand at her throat showing distress from acid regurgitation

Report your regurgitation and how it disrupts your life

Regurgitation is one of the three symptoms listed in the 30% criteria under DC 7346 (dysphagia, pyrosis, regurgitation). Describing when it occurs, how often, and what activities it limits matches the examiner’s documentation framework.

Regurgitation at night is especially important, it creates aspiration risk, which is a criterion for the highest tier under DC 7206. If you have ever choked or aspirated reflux material while sleeping, that must be on the record.

"I get acid and food coming back up into my throat multiple times a day, especially if I bend over or lie down. At night, I wake up choking on acid. I have to sleep propped up on three pillows, and even then it happens."

White male veteran in his 60s at a dining table with one hand at his throat showing a pained expression from difficulty swallowing

Describe your swallowing difficulty as food getting stuck, not just discomfort

Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) is a critical rating driver under both codes. Under DC 7206, dysphagia from strictures is the gateway to every rating tier from 10% to 80%. Describing the sensation as food physically getting stuck, not merely discomfort, signals the structural narrowing the code rewards.

If you have changed your diet to avoid foods that get stuck, switching from solid foods to soft foods or liquids, that is powerful evidence of functional impairment from dysphagia.

"Solid food gets stuck in my throat several times a week. I have to drink water to push it down, and sometimes I have to stop eating entirely. I have switched to mostly soft foods and soups because I am afraid of choking."

Black female veteran in her 30s sitting on a couch hunched forward with both hands pressing on her upper abdomen in epigastric distress

Quantify your nausea and epigastric pain, frequency and what it stops you from doing

Persistent epigastric distress is the threshold language of the 30% tier under DC 7346. Describing how often you experience nausea and upper abdominal pain, and what activities it prevents, builds the “considerable impairment of health” standard the rater is looking for.

If nausea or epigastric pain causes you to miss meals, lose weight, or avoid social situations involving food, explain that. Weight loss from inability to eat comfortably is a direct rating driver.

"I have a constant gnawing pain in my upper stomach that gets worse after eating. The nausea is so bad some days that I skip meals entirely. I have lost fifteen pounds over the past year because eating makes me so miserable."

Secondary conditions to raise in the same appointment

Every secondary condition laid out in the Secondary Conditions section above belongs in this same appointment. Name each one out loud, tell the examiner how the primary condition caused it or made it worse, and ask that it be noted in the report. Under 38 CFR 3.310, a secondary condition the examiner never hears about is a secondary condition the VA never rates. Bring your list on paper so nothing gets left in the parking lot.

What to expect at this specific exam

  • Obtain an upper endoscopy (EGD) before your exam if you have never had one, stricture documentation is now the primary rating driver under DC 7206
  • Compile your complete medication history, every PPI, H2 blocker, and antacid prescription with dates, dosages, and the prescribing provider
  • Bring your weight records over the past several years to document any material or substantial weight loss
  • Gather all GI-related lab work, hemoglobin, hematocrit, iron studies, to document anemia from chronic bleeding
  • If claiming secondary to PTSD or medications, bring your service-connection documentation and a nexus letter explaining the mechanism
  • Maintain a detailed symptom diary for at least 30 days before the exam, recording every flare: date, severity, duration, triggers, sleep disruption, and impact on work and daily life

04The Protocol

What procedures are required during the exam

These are not courtesies. Each comes out of the regulation or out of binding case law. Take this list in with you and tick them off as they happen.

Close-up of gloved medical hands guiding a flexible endoscope during an upper endoscopy procedure with clinical draping and monitors in the background
Fig. 01, Upper endoscopy (EGD), the gold-standard diagnostic

01Upper endoscopy (EGD), the gold-standard diagnostic

38 C.F.R. §4.114, DC 7206 (GERD); DC 7346 (Hiatal Hernia)

An esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is the most important diagnostic test in a GERD claim. A flexible scope is passed through the mouth into the esophagus and stomach, allowing the gastroenterologist to directly visualize the esophageal lining, document esophagitis (inflammation), identify and measure esophageal strictures, detect hiatal hernia, and biopsy for Barrett’s esophagus, a pre-cancerous condition caused by chronic acid exposure. Under the new DC 7206, the presence and severity of strictures is the primary rating driver, and the EGD is the only way to definitively document them.

Stricture documentation drives ratings from 10% to 80% under DC 7206. Without an EGD, the examiner has no objective structural findings to report and the veteran is capped at 10% for daily medication. An EGD before the C&P exam is the single most impactful thing a veteran can do to maximize their GERD rating.

Native American female veteran in her 50s standing in front of a fluoroscopy machine holding a plain white barium contrast cup while a medical technician observes
Fig. 02, Barium swallow study, imaging the reflux and hiatal hernia

02Barium swallow study, imaging the reflux and hiatal hernia

38 C.F.R. §4.114, DC 7346 / DC 7206

A barium swallow (upper GI series) involves swallowing barium contrast while a series of X-ray or fluoroscopic images are taken. It shows the shape and function of the esophagus, the presence and size of a hiatal hernia, reflux of barium back into the esophagus, and esophageal strictures on imaging. While not as sensitive as an EGD for mucosal detail, a barium swallow provides dynamic, real-time visualization of swallowing mechanics and reflux, particularly useful for documenting the hiatal hernia under DC 7346 and strictures under DC 7206.

A barium swallow provides independent imaging evidence of the hiatal hernia, the reflux mechanism, and any strictures, corroborating the EGD findings from a different modality and strengthening the evidentiary record.

Close-up of a thin esophageal pH monitoring catheter taped near a patient’s nose with a small recording device on the chest in a clinical setting
Fig. 03, Esophageal pH monitoring, 24-hour acid measurement

03Esophageal pH monitoring, 24-hour acid measurement

38 C.F.R. §4.114, DC 7346 / DC 7206

Esophageal pH monitoring places a thin catheter through the nose into the esophagus to continuously measure acid exposure over 24 hours. It provides objective, quantitative data on the frequency, duration, and severity of reflux episodes, data that no symptom description can match. An abnormal pH study (the DeMeester score exceeds normal) is powerful objective evidence that the veteran has pathological reflux, and it corroborates the structural findings from the EGD. For veterans whose endoscopy does not show strictures, the pH study may still support a compensable rating by documenting the severity of the disease.

pH monitoring is the only test that measures actual acid exposure over time. It converts the veteran’s subjective complaints into objective, quantitative data the examiner can cite.

Physician in a white coat performing abdominal palpation on a patient lying on an examination table in a clinical setting
Fig. 04, Abdominal physical examination, epigastric palpation

04Abdominal physical examination, epigastric palpation

38 C.F.R. §§4.1, 4.10, 4.114

The C&P examiner performs a hands-on abdominal examination, focusing on the epigastric region, the upper central abdomen directly below the sternum. Palpation documents tenderness, guarding, and any clinical signs consistent with chronic reflux disease and hiatal hernia. While less definitive than endoscopy or imaging, the physical exam provides contemporaneous clinical findings that support the veteran’s reported symptoms and show that the disease is active on exam day.

Epigastric tenderness on palpation is an objective clinical finding that corroborates the veteran’s subjective symptom report. It also demonstrates that the examiner physically examined the veteran rather than relying solely on records review.

Older white male counselor with glasses meeting across a desk with a young Black female veteran to discuss the functional impact of her condition
Fig. 05, Functional capacity and occupational impact assessment

05Functional capacity and occupational impact assessment

38 C.F.R. §§4.1, 4.10, 4.114; §4.16 (TDIU)

Beyond the diagnostic findings, the C&P examiner documents how GERD affects your daily life and ability to work, the meals you skip because eating makes you sick, the sleep you lose to nighttime reflux, the workdays you miss to flares and medical procedures, and the activities you can no longer enjoy. Be prepared to describe your worst periods, not your best, because GERD waxes and wanes and the rating should reflect the full burden. This documentation is essential for TDIU claims and for building the “considerable” or “severe” impairment-of-health standard that drives the upper tiers under DC 7346.

Functional-impact documentation supports TDIU and paints the full picture of a disease whose symptom severity fluctuates. A snapshot exam-day assessment does not capture the chronic burden of a condition that disrupts eating, sleeping, and working.

05The Standard

What makes an exam adequate

Read your exam report against these. An exam that fails the standard is legally inadequate, and an inadequate exam is something you challenge rather than accept.

01

The range of motion has to be MEASURED, not estimated

38 CFR §4.46 states that the use of a goniometer in the measurement of limitation of motion is indispensable in examinations conducted within the Department of Veterans Affairs. An examiner who eyeballs your bend and writes a number has not complied with the regulation. This is the most common defect in a spine exam and it is the easiest one to spot from the chair.

02

Joints must be tested in every required condition

Under Correia v. McDonald, a joint examination for pain must, wherever possible, record active motion, passive motion, motion in weight-bearing and motion in non-weight-bearing, and where relevant, the range of the opposite undamaged joint. An exam that records one set of numbers and stops is incomplete on its face, and that incompleteness is grounds to challenge it.

03

Flare-ups have to be addressed, not dodged

Under Sharp v. Shulkin, when a veteran describes flare-ups, the examiner is obligated to estimate the additional loss of motion during a flare based on all the available evidence, including your own account of it. "I cannot opine without resorting to mere speculation" is not automatically acceptable; the examiner has to have actually sought the information first and explained why an estimate is impossible.

04

Repetitive use and functional loss must be factored in

Sections 4.40 and 4.45, and the DeLuca line of cases, require that pain, weakness, fatigability, incoordination and lack of endurance after repeated use be considered, and expressed in additional degrees of lost motion where that is feasible. Your rating is supposed to reflect what you can do on the fifth repetition and on a bad day, not just the first careful bend of the morning.

05

Neurological findings must be separately documented

Note (1) to the General Rating Formula requires that any associated objective neurologic abnormality be evaluated separately under an appropriate diagnostic code. If your leg symptoms were mentioned in the narrative but never tested and never assigned, the exam did not do what the schedule requires of it.

06

The examiner must review the record when the question requires it

Where a medical opinion on cause, aggravation or a secondary relationship was requested, the examiner is expected to review the relevant evidence and give a reasoned explanation. A bare conclusion, "less likely than not related to service" with no reasoning attached, carries little weight, and an opinion with no rationale is challengeable.

07

The examiner has to be qualified for the body system

The VA may use its own clinicians or a contract vendor. Either way, the examiner is expected to have the competence to evaluate the system being examined. If a spinal exam with a neurological component was performed by someone who never tested a reflex, that is a problem worth raising.

08

The exam has to be CURRENT

A rating is supposed to reflect your condition now. An exam performed before a documented worsening, or years before the decision, may not support the current evaluation, and you can request a new one on that basis.

06Afterward

What happens after your exam is complete

The examiner writes the report and submits it, it is reviewed for completeness, and only then does the claim move toward a rating decision. Here is what actually controls the clock.

Examiner at a desk completing and submitting the exam questionnaire
01

The examiner writes and submits the report

Days 1–5 after the exam

The examiner compiles the history, the physical findings, the measurements and any testing into the questionnaire, adds any requested medical opinion, and submits it. Contract vendors typically have a turnaround requirement measured in days, not weeks.

Nothing about your claim moves while this is happening, and nothing you do speeds it up. What matters is that the report is written from notes taken in the room, which is exactly why what you said, and how the examiner recorded it, is already locked in by the time you get to your car. Request your copy now rather than later.

Reviewer flagging an incomplete field and sending the exam report back to the examiner
02

Quality review, and the request for clarification

Days 3–30

The report is reviewed for completeness. If it is internally inconsistent, missing a required field or missing the opinion the VA asked for, it goes back for correction or a second opinion. This is the single most common cause of a claim appearing to stall after the exam.

Understand what a finished exam actually means: it means the appointment happened, not that your claim is ready for a decision. If the reviewer finds a blank range-of-motion field, an opinion that does not answer the question that was asked, or findings that contradict each other, the file goes back out for more information. That is a normal quality control step, not a rejection of your claim, and it is not a sign that you did something wrong, but it does add weeks, and it is the reason so much of what you read online sounds like the system is broken.

Claim status tracker on a screen showing the progress bar jumped backward from a late step to an early step
03

Your status tracker moves backward, and it is usually not bad news

Any time after the exam

The online tracker shows eight steps. Veterans watch it reach step 7 or 8, then find it back at step 3 or 4 a week later. That regression almost always means one thing: the file went back for additional information, most often a returned or clarified exam.

This is the number one thing veterans panic about, and it is misread constantly. The tracker is not a countdown, it is a location marker. When the VA decides it needs one more piece of evidence, a corrected exam, a clarifying medical opinion or an outstanding record, the claim is routed back to the evidence gathering step and the bar redraws itself where the file physically is. It does not mean a denial. It does not mean your case was thrown out or restarted. It does not erase anything already in the file, and it does not change your effective date. What it does mean is that something in the record was not good enough to decide on yet, which is worth knowing, because if the weak link is the exam, this is the window where a corrective statement or a private opinion from your own doctor does the most good.

Medical records folders being handed across a counter as the evidence gathering window closes
04

Evidence gathering closes

Varies

Before anyone rates your claim, the file has to be built. This is the stretch where the Regional Office pulls together everything the decision will rest on: your service treatment records, your VA medical records, any federal records, the C&P exam report, and any private records it has requested on your behalf. The claim sits here until the VA is satisfied the record is complete enough to decide, which is exactly why a status tracker can appear to stall or slide backward at this step. You are not powerless while it sits here. Anything you put into the file yourself lands the day you send it, and every relevant record you add now is one less thing the rater can later say was missing.

A VA request to a private provider is a letter that may or may not be answered, and the VA will wait on it for weeks before moving on, sometimes without ever getting a response. A record you walk in yourself, or upload through your claim, is in the file the day you send it. So do not sit and wait to be asked. If you know a treatment record, an imaging report, a surgical note or a buddy statement exists and it matters, send it now, with a VA Form 21-4138 statement that explains in plain words what the document is and what it shows. This is also the window where a corrective statement or a private medical opinion from your own doctor does the most good, before the rater has locked in a decision, not after. Once the evidence gathering step closes, the file goes to a rating specialist, and your chance to shape the record cheaply and quickly closes with it.

Rating specialist applying the rating schedule to a file and producing the decision letter
05

Rating decision and promulgation

Typically several weeks after the last piece of evidence lands

This is the stage where your evidence finally becomes a number. A rating specialist, not the examiner, and not a doctor, takes everything in the file and applies the rating schedule to it: the exam findings, your range-of-motion measurements, your lay statements, your private records and any medical opinions. They assign a diagnostic code to each condition, pull a percentage from the schedule, set your effective date, and either grant, deny or defer each issue. The decision is then reviewed and authorized, promulgation is simply the VA’s word for making it official, and the decision letter and code sheet are generated and mailed. Where an award is made, payment follows the effective date rules, and back pay is calculated to that date.

Read the code sheet, not just the percentage. It names the diagnostic code used, the exact measurements relied on and the effective date assigned, and that is where most mistakes live. This is a human being reading a file under a production quota, and the two things that go wrong most often are a rater using the pre-repetition range-of-motion numbers instead of the worst-case figures §4.59 and §4.40 require, and a claimed condition being decided on a thin record or quietly left out. Check whether painful motion was accounted for, whether your radiculopathy was rated separately under Note (1) or folded into the spine rating, and whether every condition you claimed was actually addressed. A decision you do not read is a decision you cannot challenge, and the deadline to challenge it starts the day the letter is dated, not the day you understand it.

Opened rating decision letter with a magnifying glass over the reasons for decision section
06

C&P examination is the decision letter

The day it lands in your mailbox

The envelope holds two different documents: the narrative decision letter, and the code sheet. Together they are the single most important piece of paper in your claim, because every deadline, every appeal option and every dollar of back pay is set by what is printed on them, not by what you were told at the exam.

Most veterans read one thing on that letter: the percentage. Then they either celebrate it or get angry at it, and file it in a drawer. That is the mistake. The percentage is the conclusion; the reasons section is the reasoning, and the reasoning is what you attack. It tells you which diagnostic code the rater used, which range-of-motion figures they relied on and which they ignored, whether painful motion under §4.59 was accounted for, whether your neurological findings were rated separately under Note (1) or folded into the spine rating, which conditions were decided, which were deferred, and which were never addressed at all. It also assigns your effective date, which controls back pay. A rating that looks low is very often not a disagreement about how bad your neck is, it is a rater who used the pre-repetition numbers, or missed the radiculopathy, or rated one side and not both. You cannot see any of that from the percentage. Do not go by the percentage alone, and do not decode it by yourself if you are not sure what you are looking at, have someone who reads these for a living read it with you before the clock runs out. You have one year from the date on that letter to file a Higher-Level Review (VA Form 20-0996), a Supplemental Claim (VA Form 20-0995) or a Board appeal, and the deadline runs from the date printed on the letter, not the date you opened it. Bring it to this office and we will go through it line by line, at no cost, and tell you plainly whether it is right.

What normal looks like: 30 to 60 days for a simple claim, longer for a complex one

After your exam you should expect some kind of notification from the VA, a decision, a request for more information, or a notice that another exam has been scheduled. For a straightforward, single-issue claim that often lands within 30 to 60 days. But 30 to 60 days is a rough guide, not a rule, and it is not a ceiling. A claim with several conditions, a toxic-exposure or presumptive question, a returned exam, or missing records routinely takes 90 days or more, and that alone does not mean anything is wrong, the more moving parts your case has, the longer the VA takes to work it. Inside the window that is normal for a case like yours, silence is expected and there is nothing to fix, and a tracker that jumps backward is normal too.

What matters is not a fixed number of days, it is whether the claim is still moving and whether you can get a straight answer about where it is. Once you are well past what is normal for a case like yours and the VA either goes silent or cannot tell you what the claim is waiting on, stop waiting. That is usually where the real trouble hides, an exam that came back twice, a records request that was never answered, a claimed condition that got dropped, or a file sitting in the wrong queue. Call the VA at 800-827-1000, ask specifically what the claim is waiting on and who it is assigned to, and write down the answer. If you cannot get a straight answer, or the answer tells you the exam is the problem, that is the moment to bring it to this office rather than sitting on it for another three months. Problems raised early get fixed inside the claim. Problems discovered in a denial letter get fixed on appeal, and that costs you a year.

Other things that control the clock

Six things decide how long you wait, and none of them are visible from the tracker alone.

VA claim status page on a monitor showing an average days to complete figure with a trend line that changes month to month
01

The average is a moving number

Check it at the source, not second-hand

The VA publishes an average days-to-complete figure for disability claims that moves month to month; check the current number on the VA’s own claim status page rather than relying on any second-hand figure. In practice, most veterans see a decision somewhere between roughly three and eight months from the date the claim was filed, with the exam usually falling in the middle of that window.

Process pipeline showing the exam marked complete at the start followed by evidence gathering, rating decision and authorization still ahead
02

The exam is not the last step

Three stages still sit in front of you

The exam is not the last step. The clock does not start at the exam and it does not stop there either, the claim still has to clear evidence gathering, the rating decision and authorization.

Exam report stamped returned for clarification beside a claim tracker whose progress bar is moving backward
03

A returned exam is the invisible delay

The reason a tracker slides backward

A returned or clarified exam is the most common invisible delay, and it is why a tracker can slide backward. Expect some contact from the VA within 30 to 60 days of the exam. Past 60 days with nothing at all, call and ask specifically what the claim is waiting on.

Calendar with days 30 through 60 shaded as the normal window and everything past day 60 shaded red beside the VA benefits phone number
04

30 to 60 days is a guide, not a deadline

A complex case can take 90 days or more

Thirty to sixty days is a rough average for a simple, single-issue claim, not a hard rule and not a ceiling. A claim with several conditions, a presumptive or toxic-exposure question, a returned exam, or missing records can easily take 90 days or more, and that alone does not mean anything is wrong. Watch whether the claim is still moving, not the calendar. Only when it stalls well past what is normal for a case like yours, and no one can tell you what it is waiting on, should you stop waiting, call 800-827-1000 and ask what the claim is waiting on and who it is assigned to.

Three ways to track a claim shown side by side: the VA.gov claim status page, the VA Health and Benefits mobile app, and the benefits telephone line
05

Watch your status yourself, in one of three places

Weekly, not daily

Check your own status in one of three places: your VA.gov claim status page, the VA Health and Benefits mobile app, or by calling 800-827-1000. Check it weekly, not daily. And understand exactly what a status check can tell you: if a decision is posted in your account, it is live; if it is not posted, it is not ready. That is the whole rule. This is not something your representative or your attorney can speed up, we see the same thing you see, at the same time, and calling us to ask does not move it. Calling the VA to ask for an update does not move it either. Watch it yourself, weekly, and the moment a decision posts, bring it to us.

Flat infographic of a VA rating decision letter held beside a calendar stamped ONE YEAR TO APPEAL, with the three appeal lanes, Higher-Level Review, Supplemental Claim and Board Appeal, labeled below
06

Your decision letter arrives, read it, then start the appeal clock

What to do the day it lands in your mailbox

The decision letter is the finish line of the claim and the starting line of the appeal, and the moment it arrives, a one-year clock starts running. Read it the same day. Find the combined rating, the percentage assigned to each condition, and the effective date, because the effective date controls how far back your back pay reaches. Then request a copy of your C&P exam report so you can see whether the rater used your real range-of-motion numbers or ignored the radiculopathy. If any part of the decision is wrong, a low rating, a denied condition, or a bad effective date, you have three appeal lanes, and you must choose one within one year of the date printed on the letter: a **Higher-Level Review (VA Form 20-0996)**, where a senior reviewer re-decides on the same evidence; a **Supplemental Claim (VA Form 20-0995)**, when you have new and relevant evidence such as a private DBQ or your own range-of-motion exam; or a **Board Appeal (VA Form 10182)** to a Veterans Law Judge. Miss that one-year deadline and the decision becomes final. You can still file again later, but you lose the original effective date, and that lost time is lost back pay you never get back. Bring the letter to this office before the year runs out and we will read it with you, line by line, at no cost.

07Remedy

How to report a bad exam

Where this exam goes wrong

The single biggest trap in a GERD claim is walking into the exam without objective testing. Under the new DC 7206, ratings above 10% require documented esophageal strictures, and the only way to document them is with an EGD or barium swallow. A second common trap is describing your condition on a “good day” instead of your worst days, GERD waxes and wanes, and the rating should reflect the full burden. A third trap is failing to connect GERD to a service-connected primary condition, GERD is rarely granted on direct service connection alone, and the strongest claims are secondary to PTSD, anxiety, or NSAID use. Finally, veterans who were rated under DC 7346 before the rule change sometimes fail to preserve their grandfathered rating when the VA proposes a reduction, if you were rated under the old criteria and the new code would result in a lower rating, your existing rating is protected.

Flat infographic of a hand writing exam notes on a notepad inside a car with a clock recording the time
01

Write it down the moment you get to your car

Date, start time, end time, the examiner’s name and credentials, the vendor, every test that was performed, and every test that was not. A contemporaneous note written the same day is evidence. A memory reconstructed four months later is not.

Flat infographic of a C&P exam report and a DBQ questionnaire being requested through VA.gov and by phone
02

Get the exam report and the questionnaire

Request a copy through VA.gov, through a written request to the Regional Office, or by calling 800-827-1000. You cannot challenge what you have not read. Compare it line by line against what actually happened in the room.

Flat infographic of a magnifying glass over a document with a defect circled in red and a regulation citation tag
03

Name the defect specifically, with the citation

Never write "the exam was unfair." Write "no goniometer was used, contrary to 38 CFR §4.46" or "flare-ups were reported and not addressed, contrary to Sharp v. Shulkin" or "repetitive use testing was not performed, contrary to 38 CFR §4.40 and DeLuca." A specific, citable defect is what forces action.

Flat infographic of VA Form 21-4138 Statement in Support of Claim being submitted with an upload arrow
04

Submit a statement asking for a new examination

VA Form 21-4138, Statement in Support of Claim, filed through VA.gov or mailed to the Evidence Intake Center. State the defect, cite the authority, and request a new or supplemental examination. Do this BEFORE the decision if the claim is still open, it is far easier than undoing a decision afterward.

Flat infographic of two separate tracks, one labeled Patient Advocate for conduct and one labeled Exam Adequacy
05

Report examiner conduct separately

If the problem is behavior rather than methodology, you were rushed out, dismissed, never touched, or treated with hostility, file a complaint with the VA facility’s Patient Advocate, or with the vendor directly for a contract exam, and copy the Regional Office. Conduct complaints and adequacy challenges are two different tracks and you can run both.

Flat infographic of a signpost forking between Higher-Level Review 20-0996 and Supplemental Claim 20-0995
06

If a decision has already issued, pick the right lane

A Higher-Level Review (VA Form 20-0996) argues the VA erred on the evidence it had, the right vehicle when the exam was inadequate on its face. A Supplemental Claim (VA Form 20-0995) is the vehicle when you are adding new and relevant evidence, such as your own private range-of-motion examination or a completed DBQ from your treating provider.

Flat infographic of a goniometer measuring a joint angle beside a completed DBQ showing range-of-motion degrees
07

Put your own measurements on the table

A private examination with full goniometric measurements, or a DBQ completed by your own provider, creates a conflict in the evidence that the VA has to resolve, and under 38 CFR §3.102 reasonable doubt is resolved in your favor.

End of clinical section

GERD (DC 7206), DC 7206

See It Before You Sit In The Room

VA Disability Rating for GERD, New DC 7206 Rating Criteria Explained

VA Claims Insider

GERD Secondary to PTSD, how to Service Connect Your Claim

Combat Craig

The Questions Veterans Actually Ask

GERD (DC 7206) Claims, Frequently Asked Questions

Straight answers to the questions that decide gerd (dc 7206) claims, the ratings, the separate evaluations, and the exam mistakes that cost veterans money. Read every answer with your own file open. If an answer depends on a record you do not have yet, that is the next thing to request, from your doctor, your unit or the VA itself.

GERD & Hiatal Hernia (DC 7346 / DC 7206) is evaluated under DC 7346 / 7206. The scale runs across 5 rating levels, and the highest is 60% (DC 7346) / 80% (DC 7206), which the VA assigns for: dC 7346: Symptoms of pain, vomiting, material weight loss, and hematemesis or melena with moderate anemia; or other symptom combinations productive of severe impairment of health. DC 7206: Recurrent or refractory esophageal strictures causing dysphagia with aspiration, undernutrition, or substantial weight loss (over 20% of baseline), requiring surgical correction or a feeding tube (PEG tube). Where your evaluation actually lands depends on how your exam and records document those criteria, not on how bad the condition feels on an average day.

A woman veteran filling out paperwork on a clipboard in a clinic waiting room
Your responsibility as a veteran

Your Part in This Is Not Optional

I will be straight with you. No advocate on earth can win a claim for a veteran who will not do his or her part. The VA decides on the record, and you are the only person who can build the medical side of that record. We do the legal and forensic work. You do yours. Here is what that means, every single time:

  • See a doctor and get every symptom written into your medical record. If it is not on paper, the VA treats it as if it never happened.
  • Keep a symptom journal. Dates, flare-ups, missed work, the nights you did not sleep. That is the evidence of how this condition actually runs your life.
  • Answer every VA letter and every request for evidence before the deadline. Silence gets claims denied.
  • Show up to your C&P exam and describe your worst days honestly. Do not tough it out in that room. Do not exaggerate either.

You do your job and we will do ours. That is how claims get won.

Choose Your Service

The Three Services

We offer three completely separate services, kept distinct on purpose so you know exactly what you are buying, what it costs, and how it is paid. These are not tiers of one agreement, you choose the single option that fits your situation.

Two are contingency representation with no cost up front; they differ by how hard the case is and how the fee gets paid. The third is a flat-fee forensic report for the veteran who wants to fight the claim himself.

An accredited claims agent and a veteran reviewing a clean, single-issue appeal together
Option 1

Standard Direct-Pay Representation

20% of back pay

No cost up front, nothing out of pocket. The VA withholds our fee and pays us directly under §14.636(h). Best for cleaner, more recent, single-issue denials, routine higher-level reviews, supplemental claims, and rating increases, carried all the way to the Board of Veterans’ Appeals.

See full details
An advocate reviewing a veteran's decade-deep claims file
Option 2

High-Complexity Representation

30% of back pay

For high-complexity cases, long claim histories, prior Board denials, CUE, complex effective-date and TDIU fights, multi-issue toxic exposure. Still no cost up front. Because the VA pays a rep only up to 20% directly, the VA sends your full retro to you and we invoice you directly for the 30%. Lawful, but never entered into lightly.

See full details
A forensic file audit in progress
Option 3

Mission 5 Intelligence Brief

$750 flat

A standalone forensic file review and written road map, not representation. For the veteran with a tough, older case who wants to fight it himself and keep 100% of his back pay. We audit your file, show you every error, and hand you the plan. Available only to veterans who already have a VA decision.

See full details

The exact contingency percentage on your case is set in a written agreement by the complexity of the work, always within the maximum the law allows. Federal-court litigation, if it is ever needed, is a separate, pre-agreed arrangement.

Denied or under-rated?

Talk to a VA-accredited claims agent about your claim

Albert L. Thombs Jr. is a US Army veteran, VA-Accredited Claims Agent #45147, and 100% service-connected himself. He personally reviews every request. Fees are capped by 38 CFR §14.636, and there are no fees on representation unless you win.

702-992-4883

Mon–Fri, 11AM–6PM Pacific

Questions are always free. The Mission 5 Brief is $750 flat.