
Hiatal Hernia
The upper stomach pushes up through the diaphragm into the chest, weakening the valve that keeps acid down and driving chronic reflux.
A hiatal hernia is a structural problem: the upper part of the stomach pushes upward through the diaphragmatic hiatus, the opening the esophagus normally passes through, into the chest cavity. That displacement weakens the lower esophageal sphincter and is one of the most common anatomical drivers of chronic acid reflux. The VA rates hiatal hernia by analogy to DC 7346, on a symptom-based scale, and under 38 CFR §4.114 it cannot be rated separately from GERD, the two are treated as coexisting digestive conditions and receive a single combined evaluation for the predominant disability picture. The rules changed on May 19, 2024: claims filed or pending before that date must also be measured under the newer DC 7206 stricture-based GERD criteria, with the VA assigning whichever result is higher. The two things that decide these claims are a diagnostic study that actually documents the hernia and a symptom record that captures your worst flares, not a snapshot of a good day.
The Diagnostic Codes
Conditions Rated In GERD & GI Conditions
These are the codes the VA will actually stamp on a decision in this group. The code you are granted under decides which formula is used, and that decides your percentage. Hiatal Hernia (DC 7346) is highlighted below.
DC 7206

GERD (Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease)
Acid backing up from the stomach into the esophagus, burning, regurgitation and chest pain that reflux medication only partly controls.
Read the full page
DC 7346

Hiatal Hernia
The upper stomach pushes up through the diaphragm into the chest, weakening the valve that keeps acid down and driving chronic reflux.
You are reading this page
Before Anything Gets Rated
What The VA Is Actually Looking For, And What Service Connection Really Means
Before the VA ever opens the rating schedule, it asks one question: is this disability the government’s responsibility? That is what “service connection” means. It is not a diagnosis, it is not sympathy, and it is not a reward for having served. It is a legal finding that a current, diagnosed disability is linked to something that happened to you in uniform. Percentages come later. If service connection is not established, there is nothing to rate and the claim is denied, no matter how bad the hiatal hernia (dc 7346) is.

For Hiatal Hernia (DC 7346) Specifically
For a hiatal hernia the rater wants the hernia objectively documented, named and sized on a barium swallow or upper endoscopy, and then the DC 7346 symptom picture that sets the tier: recurrent epigastric distress, dysphagia, heartburn, regurgitation, substernal/arm/shoulder pain, and, at the top tier, vomiting, material weight loss, and hematemesis or melena with anemia. Because a hiatal hernia and GERD cannot be rated separately under §4.114, the VA assigns one evaluation for the predominant picture, so make sure the record captures the full combined burden. If the hernia was caused or aggravated by an in-service injury or another service-connected condition, the nexus under §3.310 is what unlocks the rating.
The three elements the VA must find. All three. Every time.
These come out of Caluza v. Brown and Shedden v. Principi, and they are the checklist a rating officer works through on your file. Miss one and the claim fails on that element alone.
A current, diagnosed disability
A doctor has to have written a diagnosis in a medical record, sliding hiatal hernia confirmed on barium esophagram, paraesophageal hiatal hernia identified on upper endoscopy, hiatal hernia with esophagitis documented on EGD, or gastroesophageal reflux disease with associated hiatal hernia noted on upper GI series. Symptoms by themselves are not a disability the VA can rate. Saunders v. Wilkie held that pain causing functional impairment can be a disability, but you still need a clinician to document it as diagnosed and impairing. The diagnosis must exist now, during the claim period, not only years ago.
An in-service event, injury, illness or aggravation
Something in service had to have happened, an injury, an exposure, a documented sick call, or steady wear over a career. It does not have to be one dramatic moment and it does not have to be spelled out in your service treatment records: buddy statements, unit records, performance evaluations and your own competent lay testimony can establish it.
A medical nexus linking the two
A qualified medical opinion that says the current diagnosis is at least as likely as not related to the in-service event. That phrase matters: at least as likely as not means 50 percent or better. Under 38 C.F.R. §3.102, when the evidence is evenly balanced, the benefit of the doubt goes to you and the claim must be granted.
The five ways service connection is established
Most veterans only know the first one. The other routes are lower-effort paths to the same grant, and the secondary route is the one most often left on the table.
Direct, 38 C.F.R. §3.303(a)
The injury or disease began in service and never went away. The classic route: three elements, one nexus opinion.
Chronicity and continuity, §3.303(b)
A chronic condition shown in service, plus continuity of the same symptoms from separation to now, can establish the link without a formal nexus opinion. Your own testimony about symptoms you can observe is competent evidence.
Presumptive, §3.307 and §3.309
Certain chronic diseases are presumed service connected if they manifest to a compensable degree within a set window after separation. You do not have to prove causation at all.
Secondary, §3.310(a) and (b)
A disability proximately due to, or aggravated by, an already service-connected condition is itself service connected. This is how Barrett's esophagus, esophageal stricture, chronic laryngitis or vocal cord damage from acid reflux, dental erosion secondary to chronic regurgitation, and aspiration pneumonia or reactive airway disease driven by nocturnal acid aspiration get on the rating sheet get on the rating sheet.
Aggravation of a pre-service condition, §3.306
If you entered service with a condition and service made it permanently worse, the increase is compensable. The VA must rebut the presumption of soundness by clear and unmistakable evidence, a bar it frequently fails to meet.
VA medical care, 38 U.S.C. §1151
An additional disability caused by VA treatment, surgery, or a failure to diagnose is compensated as if it were service connected.
The bottom line, there is no way around this
No diagnosis, no rating. It has to be chronic. It has to cause impairment.
Without a diagnosis, the VA will not rate your claim.
The VA cannot rate a hiatal hernia under DC 7346 without an objective diagnostic study in the record, a physician writing 'patient reports reflux symptoms' is not a diagnosis of hiatal hernia. Veterans lose this element constantly because their treatment was managed symptomatically with PPIs and no one ever ordered the upper GI series or endoscopy that would have documented the structural defect. If your service records or post-service records contain only symptom complaints and prescription histories, the rater has nothing to hang a rating on.
The condition must be chronic.
A hiatal hernia is a permanent anatomical displacement, so chronicity is usually not the hard fight, but the symptom record has to show a continuous history of treatment and flares from service to the present, or the VA will argue the condition resolved or was not chronic. Gaps of years with no treatment visits, no prescription refills, and no documented complaints give the VA an opening to rate the condition at 0 percent on the grounds that it is currently asymptomatic, even if the structural hernia is still present on imaging.
It must cause actual impairment.
Under DC 7346 and §4.1 and §4.10, impairment is measured by how much the condition interferes with ordinary activity and earning capacity, not by the anatomical finding alone. A hernia confirmed on imaging but described in your records as 'well-controlled on medication' with no documented vomiting, dysphagia, or weight loss will land at 0 percent, meaning service connection exists but you receive no compensation. The zero-percent trap is a treatment record that shows your symptoms are managed, without capturing the frequency and severity of breakthrough episodes that actually reflect your functional loss.
What this means for you before you file: Before you file, get your imaging reports, endoscopy records, and every treatment note that documents a flare, an ER visit, a medication change, or a weight drop into one place. If you have never had a formal diagnostic study, get one ordered now, because without it, DC 7346 has nothing to work with. Under Mittleider v. West, when headache symptoms cannot be medically separated from a service-connected TBI or cervical condition, all overlapping symptoms must be attributed to the service-connected disability. Esteban v. Brown protects separate ratings for distinct manifestations.
The Percentages
Rating Schedule, Hiatal Hernia, DC 7346
Reproduced from 38 CFR §4.114, Diagnostic Code 7346. A hiatal hernia and GERD are coexisting digestive conditions that under §4.114 cannot be rated separately, the VA assigns a single evaluation reflecting the predominant disability picture. Claims filed or pending before May 19, 2024 are also evaluated under the newer DC 7206 criteria, with the higher result assigned. The governing questionnaire is the Esophageal Conditions DBQ.

60%
Symptoms of pain, vomiting, material weight loss, and hematemesis or melena with moderate anemia; or other symptom combinations productive of severe impairment of health.
30%
Persistently recurrent epigastric distress with dysphagia, pyrosis, and regurgitation, accompanied by substernal, arm, or shoulder pain, productive of considerable impairment of health.
10%
Two or more of the symptoms required for the 30% evaluation (dysphagia, pyrosis, regurgitation, substernal pain) present at lesser severity.
0%
Documented hiatal hernia that does not produce the symptom combination required for a compensable rating, still service-connected, and still the anchor for secondary reflux, Barrett’s, and stricture claims.
Service Connection
Advice from the Advocate
This is where I stop explaining the rules and tell you how I would build your Hiatal Hernia (DC 7346) claim if you were sitting across my desk. Read the causation notes below twice. The VA will not connect the dots for you, even though 38 CFR 3.159 says it has a duty to assist. Your job is to put the in-service event, the current diagnosis and the medical link on paper, then make the examiner deal with all three.

The advocate's notes on causation, Hiatal Hernia (DC 7346)
The separate arguments that decide this code: where the VA will attack, the regulation that answers it, and the evidence that closes the gap.
1Direct service connection, §3.303(a)
A hiatal hernia documented in service, on a barium swallow, endoscopy, or chest imaging, or shown to be chronic within the presumptive period, establishes direct service connection. Pull every abdominal or chest study, sick-call entry, and separation-exam note that references reflux, hernia, or upper-GI symptoms.
2Secondary to a service-connected respiratory condition, §3.310(a)
Chronic coughing from a service-connected respiratory disability (asthma, COPD, chronic sinusitis with post-nasal drainage) repeatedly raises intra-abdominal and intra-thoracic pressure and is a recognized mechanism for developing or worsening a hiatal hernia. The nexus letter should tie the cough to the herniation.
3Caused or aggravated by in-service trauma or straining, §3.310(b)
In-service abdominal or thoracic trauma, blast exposure, or years of heavy lifting can stretch the diaphragmatic hiatus. Where a hiatal hernia pre-existed or developed independently, a service-connected condition may have permanently worsened it; the nexus letter must establish a measurable baseline and document the aggravation.
4Do not let it be rated away as "just GERD"
Under §4.114 a hiatal hernia and GERD receive a single combined evaluation, but that single rating must reflect the FULL symptom burden of both. If your decision acknowledged reflux but ignored a documented hernia or under-counted your symptoms, that is an under-evaluation you can challenge.
Exposure & Aggravation
How Hiatal Hernia (DC 7346) Happens In Service, And How It Gets Worse

The VA wants an in-service event, and most veterans think that means one dramatic injury. It does not. Years of duty that wore the body down count too, and under 38 CFR 3.306 a condition service made worse can still be connected. Find yourself in the list below, then put that duty in writing with dates, units and names. The board only weighs what you put on paper.
How veterans pick this up in uniform, Hiatal Hernia (DC 7346)
Hiatal Hernia (DC 7346) rarely announces itself with one dramatic moment. It is built by what service asked of your body over months and years, and once it is service-connected, it is compensated for how it keeps getting worse, not for how it started. Below is how veterans pick this up in uniform, and who is most prone to it.
- In-service abdominal or thoracic trauma, a vehicle accident, blast overpressure, hard parachute landing, or blunt-force injury that stretched or tore the diaphragmatic hiatus
- Heavy repetitive lifting and straining, the load-bearing demands of infantry, artillery, engineer, and manual-labor MOSs raise intra-abdominal pressure and promote herniation
- In-service abdominal or thoracic surgery, where the diaphragmatic hiatus was disrupted or weakened
- Chronic cough from a service-connected respiratory condition (asthma, COPD, sinusitis), which repeatedly forces the stomach upward through the hiatus
- Persistent vomiting and retching from other service-connected illnesses or their treatment
- Chronic reflux that, over years, enlarges the hiatus and allows the stomach to migrate into the chest
Who is most prone to it
Veterans who sustained in-service abdominal or thoracic trauma or surgery; those in physically demanding fields with years of heavy lifting and straining; veterans with service-connected respiratory conditions that cause chronic cough; and veterans with long-standing GERD in which chronic reflux gradually enlarged the diaphragmatic opening. Hiatal hernia is frequently under-claimed because veterans assume it is just "part of" their reflux, but it is a distinct diagnostic finding that anchors the entire GI claim.
The Symptoms
What Hiatal Hernia (DC 7346) Actually Feels Like
Read this list the way the examiner will. Every symptom you live with but never report is a symptom the VA treats as if it does not exist. The rating schedule pays for how Hiatal Hernia (DC 7346) affects your daily life and your work, so the details matter. Check off what matches your day, tell your doctor in those words, and make sure it lands in your treatment record before the exam.

- Heartburn and a burning behind the breastbone that worsens after meals and when lying down, the hallmark of the reflux a hiatal hernia drives
- Regurgitation of acid or food back into the throat or mouth, often at night, leaving a sour or bitter taste
- A feeling of food sticking or passing slowly (dysphagia) as the displaced anatomy and acid irritation narrow the esophagus
- Chest, substernal, arm, or shoulder pain that can mimic cardiac symptoms
- Belching, bloating, and early fullness after only a small amount of food
- Shortness of breath or a sensation of pressure in the chest when the hernia is large and crowds the lungs
- Vomiting, and in severe cases hematemesis (vomiting blood) or melena (dark tarry stools) from esophageal erosion
- Unintentional weight loss when eating becomes uncomfortable enough to avoid meals
How this one is rated
Hiatal hernia is rated by analogy to DC 7346 under 38 CFR §4.114. For claims filed before May 19, 2024, the VA evaluates under both the DC 7346 symptom criteria and the newer DC 7206 stricture criteria and assigns whichever is higher; for claims on or after that date, DC 7206 controls the reflux picture while the hernia itself is still described under 7346. Under DC 7346: 60% for pain, vomiting, material weight loss, and hematemesis or melena with moderate anemia, or other symptom combinations productive of severe impairment of health; 30% for persistently recurrent epigastric distress with dysphagia, pyrosis, and regurgitation accompanied by substernal, arm, or shoulder pain productive of considerable impairment; 10% for two or more of the 30% symptoms at lesser severity. Under §4.114, hiatal hernia and GERD are coexisting conditions that receive a single evaluation, not separate ratings.
What you are measured against
The hiatal hernia itself is documented structurally, a barium swallow (upper GI series) shows the stomach displaced above the diaphragm and the reflux of contrast back into the esophagus, and an upper endoscopy (EGD) confirms the hernia, measures it, documents any esophagitis or stricture, and biopsies for Barrett’s esophagus. The rating, however, is measured on the DC 7346 symptom scale: the examiner records dysphagia, pyrosis, regurgitation, substernal pain, vomiting, weight loss, hematemesis, melena, and anemia, and the rater judges whether the overall picture amounts to considerable (30%) or severe (60%) impairment of health. Objective proof of the hernia plus a documented symptom burden is what moves the evaluation up the scale.
Accredited Claims Agent #45147
Ready To Get This Rated Correctly?
You have read how the VA rates Hiatal Hernia (DC 7346). Now the question is whether your file proves it. We represent veterans on a No Win, No Fee basis: 20% Direct-Pay paid by the VA from back pay, or 30% High-Complexity, and you owe nothing for representation if your rating does not increase. If you only need the roadmap, the Mission 5 Brief is a separate $750 flat fee. You bring the records, we build the argument.
GERD & GI Conditions, In Detail
GERD & GI Conditions, Service Connection In Depth
Here is each claimable condition in this group on its own terms, what it is, what service did to it, and what the VA requires before it will connect it.

GERD (Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease)
Gastroesophageal reflux disease is one of the most commonly claimed, and most commonly under-rated, conditions among veterans, and the rules changed on May 19, 2024. Before that date GERD was rated by analogy to DC 7346 (Hiatal Hernia); the new DC 7206 rates it primarily on esophageal strictures confirmed by endoscopy. If your claim was filed or pending before that date, the VA must evaluate you under both codes and give you the higher rating. GERD is not a PACT Act presumptive, but it is one of the most commonly granted secondary claims: to service-connected PTSD and to the NSAIDs taken for a service-connected orthopedic condition. Because the new code rewards structure over symptoms, diagnostic testing is everything.
Read the full GERD (DC 7206) page
Hiatal Hernia
A hiatal hernia is a structural problem: the upper part of the stomach pushes upward through the diaphragmatic hiatus, the opening the esophagus normally passes through, into the chest cavity. That displacement weakens the lower esophageal sphincter and is one of the most common anatomical drivers of chronic acid reflux. The VA rates hiatal hernia by analogy to DC 7346, on a symptom-based scale, and under 38 CFR §4.114 it cannot be rated separately from GERD, the two are treated as coexisting digestive conditions and receive a single combined evaluation for the predominant disability picture. The rules changed on May 19, 2024: claims filed or pending before that date must also be measured under the newer DC 7206 stricture-based GERD criteria, with the VA assigning whichever result is higher. The two things that decide these claims are a diagnostic study that actually documents the hernia and a symptom record that captures your worst flares, not a snapshot of a good day.
You are reading this page now
The C&P Exam
What To Expect At The Hiatal Hernia (DC 7346) Exam
This is the encounter your rating is built on. The examiner has a checklist and a limited window, what follows is exactly what happens in that room, so none of it surprises you.
Clinical Section, What To Expect at the Exam
What to Expect at Your Hiatal Hernia C&P Examination
DC 7346, the hernia is documented on imaging, but the rating is scored on your symptom burden
The hiatal hernia C&P exam has two jobs, and veterans lose ratings when the examiner only does one. The first job is **structural**: confirming and describing the hernia on a **barium swallow** or **upper endoscopy**. The second, the one that actually sets your percentage, is **symptom documentation** under **DC 7346**: how often you have dysphagia, heartburn, regurgitation, and substernal pain, and whether the overall picture reaches **considerable** (30%) or **severe** (60%) impairment of health. Because §4.114 bars rating the hernia separately from GERD, the single evaluation must capture the **full combined burden** of both. Walk in with your imaging report, your complete medication list, your weight history, any operative note if you have had a repair, and a symptom diary that documents your worst flares, not just your best hour in the exam room.
Condition
Hiatal Hernia (DC 7346), DC 7346
Governing questionnaire
Esophageal Conditions DBQ, hiatal hernia diagnosis and size, symptom frequency and severity, diagnostic test results (barium swallow, EGD), medication regimen, weight history, surgical history, and functional impact
Click the form number to open the official questionnaire on VA.gov.
01In The Room
What happens during the exam
The tests and maneuvers for this condition
- Barium swallow (upper GI series), X-ray imaging while swallowing barium contrast that shows the stomach displaced above the diaphragm, the size and type of the hernia, and reflux of contrast back into the esophagus
- Upper endoscopy (esophagogastroduodenoscopy / EGD), a flexible scope that confirms and measures the hernia, documents esophagitis and strictures, and biopsies for Barrett’s esophagus
- Esophageal pH monitoring (24-hour), quantifies acid exposure over a full day, corroborating the reflux driven by the hernia
- Esophageal manometry, measures esophageal muscle function and lower esophageal sphincter pressure, often obtained before surgical repair
- Blood work and nutritional labs, complete blood count for anemia from chronic bleeding, plus weight and albumin to document nutritional impact
What gets measured, and to what number
Documentation and size of the hiatal hernia
The examiner should confirm the hernia on barium swallow or EGD and note its size and type (sliding vs. paraesophageal). This is the structural foundation of the claim, even though the percentage is driven by symptoms.
Dysphagia, pyrosis, and regurgitation
These three symptoms are the core of the 30% criteria under DC 7346. The examiner documents their frequency, severity, and whether they are accompanied by substernal, arm, or shoulder pain, the combination that establishes considerable impairment of health.
Vomiting, hematemesis, melena, and anemia
The 60% tier requires pain, vomiting, material weight loss, and hematemesis or melena with moderate anemia. Bring any labs showing low hemoglobin and any ER records for GI bleeding.
Weight loss and nutritional status
Material weight loss from the inability to eat comfortably is a 60% criterion. The examiner records current versus baseline weight; bring documentation of your weight history over several years.
Functional impact and symptom frequency
The rater judges considerable versus severe impairment of health from how often and how badly your symptoms disrupt eating, sleeping, and working. A detailed symptom diary is the evidence that drives this subjective standard.
02Orientation
What to expect during this exam
What makes this exam different from every other C&P exam
1The hernia must be objectively documented, bring the study
Unlike pure GERD, a hiatal hernia is a structural finding that should be visible on a barium swallow or endoscopy. If your records already contain a study that names and sizes the hernia, bring it, it removes any argument about whether the diagnosis exists. If you have never had imaging that documents the hernia, ask your provider to order a barium swallow before the exam.
2One rating covers hernia AND reflux, so count everything
Under §4.114, the VA cannot give you a separate rating for the hernia and another for GERD; you get a single evaluation for the predominant picture. That makes it essential that the examiner records the FULL symptom set, every symptom of both conditions, so the single rating lands at the correct tier instead of being split in the examiner’s mind and undercounted.
3Surgical repair does not erase the rating
If you have had a Nissen fundoplication or other hiatal hernia repair, the operative note is important evidence, but surgery does not automatically end the disability. Many veterans continue to have reflux, dysphagia, dumping, or bloating after repair. Report every residual symptom; the rating is based on your current functional burden, not on the fact that a surgeon operated.
See it before you sit in the room
03Preparation
Know your symptoms and secondary factors
What the report must actually say about hiatal hernia (dc 7346), dc 7346
- Bring and point to the imaging or endoscopy report that names your hiatal hernia, do not assume the examiner has read it. The documented hernia is the structural anchor of the whole claim.
- Report the full set of symptoms from BOTH the hernia and the reflux, because §4.114 gives you one combined rating and everything you leave out lowers the tier.
- Describe your swallowing difficulty concretely, what foods get stuck, how often, and whether you have ever choked or aspirated, especially at night.
- Quantify any weight loss, your highest stable weight versus your current weight and whether it was unintentional, because material weight loss is a 60% criterion.
- If you have had a Nissen fundoplication or other repair, describe every symptom you still have afterward, reflux, dysphagia, bloating, dumping, because the rating is based on your current burden, not the surgery.
Pain level, frequency, lost work and functional loss, how to say them

Describe your reflux as constant and position-dependent, not occasional
The 30% tier under DC 7346 requires persistently recurrent epigastric distress. Explaining that the reflux worsens when you bend over or lie down, the classic hiatal-hernia pattern, matches the regulatory language and the anatomy.
If you have to sleep propped up on pillows or in a recliner to control nighttime reflux, say so, it is powerful evidence of severity and of aspiration risk.
"The acid comes up every time I bend over or lie down. I sleep propped up on three pillows and it still wakes me at night. Even on my medication, it breaks through most days."

Report swallowing difficulty as food getting stuck
Dysphagia is one of the three core symptoms in the 30% criteria and a marker that the reflux has begun to narrow the esophagus. Describing food physically getting stuck, not mere discomfort, signals the severity the code rewards.
If you have changed your diet to soft foods or liquids to avoid choking, that is strong evidence of functional impairment.
"Solid food gets stuck in my chest several times a week. I have to drink water to force it down, and I have switched to mostly soft foods because I am afraid of choking."
Secondary conditions to raise in the same appointment

Radiculopathy in each arm or leg
Note (1) to the General Rating Formula makes separate evaluation of objective neurologic abnormalities mandatory. Each limb is its own diagnostic code and its own percentage. Say the word "radiating" and point down the limb.

The opposite-side and downstream joints
An antalgic gait loads the good hip, the knees and the feet for years. If you have been limping since your back went, and the other joints have started to hurt, that is a secondary service-connection theory under 38 CFR §3.310.

Sleep impairment
Pain that wakes you, or that stops you lying flat, is a documented consequence of the spine condition. Track how many times a night you wake and how many hours you actually sleep, and say it in the room.

Depression and anxiety secondary to chronic pain
A mental health condition caused or aggravated by service-connected chronic pain is separately compensable. This is one of the most under-claimed secondaries in the entire system, and it needs a diagnosis in the chart to be claimed.

Bowel, bladder and sexual dysfunction
Nerve involvement at the lower levels can produce these, and veterans almost never volunteer them. They are separately ratable. New or worsening bowel or bladder changes are also a medical emergency, go to an emergency room.

Medication side effects
Gastrointestinal damage from long-term NSAID use, and the effects of muscle relaxers or opioids, can be claimed as secondary to the treatment for the service-connected condition. List every medication and how long you have been on it.
What to expect at this specific exam
- Obtain and bring the barium swallow or EGD report that documents and sizes the hernia, order one before the exam if you have never had imaging
- Compile your complete reflux medication history, every PPI, H2 blocker, and antacid with dates and dosages
- Bring your weight records over the past several years to document any material weight loss
- Gather all GI-related labs, hemoglobin, hematocrit, iron studies, to document anemia from chronic bleeding
- If you have had surgical repair, bring the operative note and a list of every residual symptom
- Keep a symptom diary for at least 30 days before the exam recording every flare: date, severity, duration, sleep disruption, and impact on work and daily life
04The Protocol
What procedures are required during the exam
These are not courtesies. Each comes out of the regulation or out of binding case law. Take this list in with you and tick them off as they happen.

01Barium swallow, imaging the hernia itself
38 C.F.R. §4.114, DC 7346
A barium swallow (upper GI series) is the classic study for a hiatal hernia. The veteran swallows barium contrast while X-ray or fluoroscopic images are taken, showing the stomach displaced above the diaphragm, the size and type of the hernia, and reflux of contrast back into the esophagus. It is the single most direct way to document the structural diagnosis on which the entire claim rests.
A barium swallow that names and sizes the hernia removes any argument about whether the diagnosis exists, the structural finding anchors the DC 7346 rating and every downstream secondary claim.

02Upper endoscopy (EGD), confirming damage and ruling out Barrett’s
38 C.F.R. §4.114, DC 7346 / DC 7206
An EGD passes a flexible scope into the esophagus and stomach to confirm and measure the hernia, document esophagitis and strictures caused by the reflux, and biopsy for Barrett’s esophagus. For a hiatal hernia, the EGD both proves the structural problem and captures the acid damage that drives the symptom burden and the secondary claims.
The EGD is the only test that both documents the hernia and detects the precancerous and structural complications that justify a higher rating and additional secondary evaluations.
05The Standard
What makes an exam adequate
Read your exam report against these. An exam that fails the standard is legally inadequate, and an inadequate exam is something you challenge rather than accept.
The range of motion has to be MEASURED, not estimated
38 CFR §4.46 states that the use of a goniometer in the measurement of limitation of motion is indispensable in examinations conducted within the Department of Veterans Affairs. An examiner who eyeballs your bend and writes a number has not complied with the regulation. This is the most common defect in a spine exam and it is the easiest one to spot from the chair.
Joints must be tested in every required condition
Under Correia v. McDonald, a joint examination for pain must, wherever possible, record active motion, passive motion, motion in weight-bearing and motion in non-weight-bearing, and where relevant, the range of the opposite undamaged joint. An exam that records one set of numbers and stops is incomplete on its face, and that incompleteness is grounds to challenge it.
Flare-ups have to be addressed, not dodged
Under Sharp v. Shulkin, when a veteran describes flare-ups, the examiner is obligated to estimate the additional loss of motion during a flare based on all the available evidence, including your own account of it. "I cannot opine without resorting to mere speculation" is not automatically acceptable; the examiner has to have actually sought the information first and explained why an estimate is impossible.
Repetitive use and functional loss must be factored in
Sections 4.40 and 4.45, and the DeLuca line of cases, require that pain, weakness, fatigability, incoordination and lack of endurance after repeated use be considered, and expressed in additional degrees of lost motion where that is feasible. Your rating is supposed to reflect what you can do on the fifth repetition and on a bad day, not just the first careful bend of the morning.
Neurological findings must be separately documented
Note (1) to the General Rating Formula requires that any associated objective neurologic abnormality be evaluated separately under an appropriate diagnostic code. If your leg symptoms were mentioned in the narrative but never tested and never assigned, the exam did not do what the schedule requires of it.
The examiner must review the record when the question requires it
Where a medical opinion on cause, aggravation or a secondary relationship was requested, the examiner is expected to review the relevant evidence and give a reasoned explanation. A bare conclusion, "less likely than not related to service" with no reasoning attached, carries little weight, and an opinion with no rationale is challengeable.
The examiner has to be qualified for the body system
The VA may use its own clinicians or a contract vendor. Either way, the examiner is expected to have the competence to evaluate the system being examined. If a spinal exam with a neurological component was performed by someone who never tested a reflex, that is a problem worth raising.
The exam has to be CURRENT
A rating is supposed to reflect your condition now. An exam performed before a documented worsening, or years before the decision, may not support the current evaluation, and you can request a new one on that basis.
06Afterward
What happens after your exam is complete
The examiner writes the report and submits it, it is reviewed for completeness, and only then does the claim move toward a rating decision. Here is what actually controls the clock.

The examiner writes and submits the report
Days 1–5 after the exam
The examiner compiles the history, the physical findings, the measurements and any testing into the questionnaire, adds any requested medical opinion, and submits it. Contract vendors typically have a turnaround requirement measured in days, not weeks.
Nothing about your claim moves while this is happening, and nothing you do speeds it up. What matters is that the report is written from notes taken in the room, which is exactly why what you said, and how the examiner recorded it, is already locked in by the time you get to your car. Request your copy now rather than later.

Quality review, and the request for clarification
Days 3–30
The report is reviewed for completeness. If it is internally inconsistent, missing a required field or missing the opinion the VA asked for, it goes back for correction or a second opinion. This is the single most common cause of a claim appearing to stall after the exam.
Understand what a finished exam actually means: it means the appointment happened, not that your claim is ready for a decision. If the reviewer finds a blank range-of-motion field, an opinion that does not answer the question that was asked, or findings that contradict each other, the file goes back out for more information. That is a normal quality control step, not a rejection of your claim, and it is not a sign that you did something wrong, but it does add weeks, and it is the reason so much of what you read online sounds like the system is broken.

Your status tracker moves backward, and it is usually not bad news
Any time after the exam
The online tracker shows eight steps. Veterans watch it reach step 7 or 8, then find it back at step 3 or 4 a week later. That regression almost always means one thing: the file went back for additional information, most often a returned or clarified exam.
This is the number one thing veterans panic about, and it is misread constantly. The tracker is not a countdown, it is a location marker. When the VA decides it needs one more piece of evidence, a corrected exam, a clarifying medical opinion or an outstanding record, the claim is routed back to the evidence gathering step and the bar redraws itself where the file physically is. It does not mean a denial. It does not mean your case was thrown out or restarted. It does not erase anything already in the file, and it does not change your effective date. What it does mean is that something in the record was not good enough to decide on yet, which is worth knowing, because if the weak link is the exam, this is the window where a corrective statement or a private opinion from your own doctor does the most good.

Evidence gathering closes
Varies
Before anyone rates your claim, the file has to be built. This is the stretch where the Regional Office pulls together everything the decision will rest on: your service treatment records, your VA medical records, any federal records, the C&P exam report, and any private records it has requested on your behalf. The claim sits here until the VA is satisfied the record is complete enough to decide, which is exactly why a status tracker can appear to stall or slide backward at this step. You are not powerless while it sits here. Anything you put into the file yourself lands the day you send it, and every relevant record you add now is one less thing the rater can later say was missing.
A VA request to a private provider is a letter that may or may not be answered, and the VA will wait on it for weeks before moving on, sometimes without ever getting a response. A record you walk in yourself, or upload through your claim, is in the file the day you send it. So do not sit and wait to be asked. If you know a treatment record, an imaging report, a surgical note or a buddy statement exists and it matters, send it now, with a VA Form 21-4138 statement that explains in plain words what the document is and what it shows. This is also the window where a corrective statement or a private medical opinion from your own doctor does the most good, before the rater has locked in a decision, not after. Once the evidence gathering step closes, the file goes to a rating specialist, and your chance to shape the record cheaply and quickly closes with it.

Rating decision and promulgation
Typically several weeks after the last piece of evidence lands
This is the stage where your evidence finally becomes a number. A rating specialist, not the examiner, and not a doctor, takes everything in the file and applies the rating schedule to it: the exam findings, your range-of-motion measurements, your lay statements, your private records and any medical opinions. They assign a diagnostic code to each condition, pull a percentage from the schedule, set your effective date, and either grant, deny or defer each issue. The decision is then reviewed and authorized, promulgation is simply the VA’s word for making it official, and the decision letter and code sheet are generated and mailed. Where an award is made, payment follows the effective date rules, and back pay is calculated to that date.
Read the code sheet, not just the percentage. It names the diagnostic code used, the exact measurements relied on and the effective date assigned, and that is where most mistakes live. This is a human being reading a file under a production quota, and the two things that go wrong most often are a rater using the pre-repetition range-of-motion numbers instead of the worst-case figures §4.59 and §4.40 require, and a claimed condition being decided on a thin record or quietly left out. Check whether painful motion was accounted for, whether your radiculopathy was rated separately under Note (1) or folded into the spine rating, and whether every condition you claimed was actually addressed. A decision you do not read is a decision you cannot challenge, and the deadline to challenge it starts the day the letter is dated, not the day you understand it.

C&P examination is the decision letter
The day it lands in your mailbox
The envelope holds two different documents: the narrative decision letter, and the code sheet. Together they are the single most important piece of paper in your claim, because every deadline, every appeal option and every dollar of back pay is set by what is printed on them, not by what you were told at the exam.
Most veterans read one thing on that letter: the percentage. Then they either celebrate it or get angry at it, and file it in a drawer. That is the mistake. The percentage is the conclusion; the reasons section is the reasoning, and the reasoning is what you attack. It tells you which diagnostic code the rater used, which range-of-motion figures they relied on and which they ignored, whether painful motion under §4.59 was accounted for, whether your neurological findings were rated separately under Note (1) or folded into the spine rating, which conditions were decided, which were deferred, and which were never addressed at all. It also assigns your effective date, which controls back pay. A rating that looks low is very often not a disagreement about how bad your neck is, it is a rater who used the pre-repetition numbers, or missed the radiculopathy, or rated one side and not both. You cannot see any of that from the percentage. Do not go by the percentage alone, and do not decode it by yourself if you are not sure what you are looking at, have someone who reads these for a living read it with you before the clock runs out. You have one year from the date on that letter to file a Higher-Level Review (VA Form 20-0996), a Supplemental Claim (VA Form 20-0995) or a Board appeal, and the deadline runs from the date printed on the letter, not the date you opened it. Bring it to this office and we will go through it line by line, at no cost, and tell you plainly whether it is right.
What normal looks like: 30 to 60 days for a simple claim, longer for a complex one
After your exam you should expect some kind of notification from the VA, a decision, a request for more information, or a notice that another exam has been scheduled. For a straightforward, single-issue claim that often lands within 30 to 60 days. But 30 to 60 days is a rough guide, not a rule, and it is not a ceiling. A claim with several conditions, a toxic-exposure or presumptive question, a returned exam, or missing records routinely takes 90 days or more, and that alone does not mean anything is wrong, the more moving parts your case has, the longer the VA takes to work it. Inside the window that is normal for a case like yours, silence is expected and there is nothing to fix, and a tracker that jumps backward is normal too.
What matters is not a fixed number of days, it is whether the claim is still moving and whether you can get a straight answer about where it is. Once you are well past what is normal for a case like yours and the VA either goes silent or cannot tell you what the claim is waiting on, stop waiting. That is usually where the real trouble hides, an exam that came back twice, a records request that was never answered, a claimed condition that got dropped, or a file sitting in the wrong queue. Call the VA at 800-827-1000, ask specifically what the claim is waiting on and who it is assigned to, and write down the answer. If you cannot get a straight answer, or the answer tells you the exam is the problem, that is the moment to bring it to this office rather than sitting on it for another three months. Problems raised early get fixed inside the claim. Problems discovered in a denial letter get fixed on appeal, and that costs you a year.
Other things that control the clock
Six things decide how long you wait, and none of them are visible from the tracker alone.

The average is a moving number
Check it at the source, not second-hand
The VA publishes an average days-to-complete figure for disability claims that moves month to month; check the current number on the VA’s own claim status page rather than relying on any second-hand figure. In practice, most veterans see a decision somewhere between roughly three and eight months from the date the claim was filed, with the exam usually falling in the middle of that window.

The exam is not the last step
Three stages still sit in front of you
The exam is not the last step. The clock does not start at the exam and it does not stop there either, the claim still has to clear evidence gathering, the rating decision and authorization.

A returned exam is the invisible delay
The reason a tracker slides backward
A returned or clarified exam is the most common invisible delay, and it is why a tracker can slide backward. Expect some contact from the VA within 30 to 60 days of the exam. Past 60 days with nothing at all, call and ask specifically what the claim is waiting on.

30 to 60 days is a guide, not a deadline
A complex case can take 90 days or more
Thirty to sixty days is a rough average for a simple, single-issue claim, not a hard rule and not a ceiling. A claim with several conditions, a presumptive or toxic-exposure question, a returned exam, or missing records can easily take 90 days or more, and that alone does not mean anything is wrong. Watch whether the claim is still moving, not the calendar. Only when it stalls well past what is normal for a case like yours, and no one can tell you what it is waiting on, should you stop waiting, call 800-827-1000 and ask what the claim is waiting on and who it is assigned to.

Watch your status yourself, in one of three places
Weekly, not daily
Check your own status in one of three places: your VA.gov claim status page, the VA Health and Benefits mobile app, or by calling 800-827-1000. Check it weekly, not daily. And understand exactly what a status check can tell you: if a decision is posted in your account, it is live; if it is not posted, it is not ready. That is the whole rule. This is not something your representative or your attorney can speed up, we see the same thing you see, at the same time, and calling us to ask does not move it. Calling the VA to ask for an update does not move it either. Watch it yourself, weekly, and the moment a decision posts, bring it to us.

Your decision letter arrives, read it, then start the appeal clock
What to do the day it lands in your mailbox
The decision letter is the finish line of the claim and the starting line of the appeal, and the moment it arrives, a one-year clock starts running. Read it the same day. Find the combined rating, the percentage assigned to each condition, and the effective date, because the effective date controls how far back your back pay reaches. Then request a copy of your C&P exam report so you can see whether the rater used your real range-of-motion numbers or ignored the radiculopathy. If any part of the decision is wrong, a low rating, a denied condition, or a bad effective date, you have three appeal lanes, and you must choose one within one year of the date printed on the letter: a **Higher-Level Review (VA Form 20-0996)**, where a senior reviewer re-decides on the same evidence; a **Supplemental Claim (VA Form 20-0995)**, when you have new and relevant evidence such as a private DBQ or your own range-of-motion exam; or a **Board Appeal (VA Form 10182)** to a Veterans Law Judge. Miss that one-year deadline and the decision becomes final. You can still file again later, but you lose the original effective date, and that lost time is lost back pay you never get back. Bring the letter to this office before the year runs out and we will read it with you, line by line, at no cost.
07Remedy
How to report a bad exam
Where this exam goes wrong
The biggest trap in a hiatal hernia claim is letting the examiner treat it as "just heartburn" and undercounting your symptoms because the hernia and GERD share one rating. Insist that the full combined symptom burden is documented. A second trap is walking in without imaging that actually names the hernia, a documented structural finding removes any argument about the diagnosis. A third is assuming that surgical repair ended the disability; residual reflux, dysphagia, and dumping after a Nissen fundoplication are common and fully ratable. Finally, describe your worst days, DC 7346 is a symptom-based scale, and a good-day snapshot will land you a tier too low.

Write it down the moment you get to your car
Date, start time, end time, the examiner’s name and credentials, the vendor, every test that was performed, and every test that was not. A contemporaneous note written the same day is evidence. A memory reconstructed four months later is not.

Get the exam report and the questionnaire
Request a copy through VA.gov, through a written request to the Regional Office, or by calling 800-827-1000. You cannot challenge what you have not read. Compare it line by line against what actually happened in the room.

Name the defect specifically, with the citation
Never write "the exam was unfair." Write "no goniometer was used, contrary to 38 CFR §4.46" or "flare-ups were reported and not addressed, contrary to Sharp v. Shulkin" or "repetitive use testing was not performed, contrary to 38 CFR §4.40 and DeLuca." A specific, citable defect is what forces action.

Submit a statement asking for a new examination
VA Form 21-4138, Statement in Support of Claim, filed through VA.gov or mailed to the Evidence Intake Center. State the defect, cite the authority, and request a new or supplemental examination. Do this BEFORE the decision if the claim is still open, it is far easier than undoing a decision afterward.

Report examiner conduct separately
If the problem is behavior rather than methodology, you were rushed out, dismissed, never touched, or treated with hostility, file a complaint with the VA facility’s Patient Advocate, or with the vendor directly for a contract exam, and copy the Regional Office. Conduct complaints and adequacy challenges are two different tracks and you can run both.

If a decision has already issued, pick the right lane
A Higher-Level Review (VA Form 20-0996) argues the VA erred on the evidence it had, the right vehicle when the exam was inadequate on its face. A Supplemental Claim (VA Form 20-0995) is the vehicle when you are adding new and relevant evidence, such as your own private range-of-motion examination or a completed DBQ from your treating provider.

Put your own measurements on the table
A private examination with full goniometric measurements, or a DBQ completed by your own provider, creates a conflict in the evidence that the VA has to resolve, and under 38 CFR §3.102 reasonable doubt is resolved in your favor.
End of clinical section
Hiatal Hernia (DC 7346), DC 7346
See It Before You Sit In The Room
VA Disability Rating for GERD & Hiatal Hernia, DC 7346 / 7206 Explained
VA Claims Insider
Hiatal Hernia & GERD Secondary Claims, how to Service Connect
Combat Craig
The Questions Veterans Actually Ask
Hiatal Hernia (DC 7346) Claims, Frequently Asked Questions
Straight answers to the questions that decide hiatal hernia (dc 7346) claims, the ratings, the separate evaluations, and the exam mistakes that cost veterans money. Read every answer with your own file open. If an answer depends on a record you do not have yet, that is the next thing to request, from your doctor, your unit or the VA itself.
A hiatal hernia is rated by analogy under DC 7346, and the highest scheduler value is 60%, assigned for symptoms of pain, vomiting, material weight loss, and hematemesis or melena with moderate anemia, or any other combination of symptoms productive of severe impairment of health. The middle tier is 30% and the entry tier is 10%. For claims filed or pending before May 19, 2024, the VA must also evaluate the same disability under the newer DC 7206 (GERD) stricture-based criteria and assign whichever result is higher.
Every condition in GERD & GI Conditions




